kepford's avatar
kepford
kepford@nostrplebs.com
npub1qqqq...hq0q
Jesus follower | Bitcoiner | Freedom Maximalist | Javascript | Drupal | Newsletter Publisher
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
Leading 'Trump Russia Hoax' Propagandist's Wife Indicted As Foreign Spy You really can't make this stuff up. For those that don't know. Max Boot, [member of the CFR](https://www.cfr.org/expert/max-boot) (Counsel on Foreign Relations) has long claimed to be a conservative yet has never met a US war he didn't love. He left the Republican Party in 2016 in response to Trump take over of the party. originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/613190
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
Turn on the Republican convention and the Teamsters president is speaking... about all this anti-freemarket labor crap. Both of these political parties have lost the plot. Trump is more of an old school democrat than a conservative...
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
When you openly wish for the death of someone you disagree with, it makes it hard to believe you are morally superior. Just a thought.
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
Video showing people pointing out the shooter that hit Trump's ear only moments later. Pretty crazy if its legit.
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
The Joe Biden Experience Source:
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
I never dreamed there would be a president with more funny clips that George W. Bush. Then we got Biden. Testing satelite.earth cdn
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
Do you know anyone that self identifies as a Christian Nationalist? In the circles I frequent many people seem very worked up about the "Christian Nationalist" movement. I have some thoughts on this but one is that I've never met anyone that uses that term to describe their political/religious position. I wonder if I'm alone in this. I know they exist. There are some that have written books and make videos. What I have noticed is that these "Christian Nationalists" are what used to be called conservative Christians. Same politics. Same goals. Same people. Wondering what others have seen. originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/602926
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
Lessons From the Cold War: Now Is the Time for De-Escalation - Antiwar.com > Most Americans think of the Cuban Missile Crisis as a time where we came uncomfortably close to nuclear exchanges with the Soviet Union. The truth is, though, things came much closer than they realize. Nuclear missiles staged in Cuba should be considered tame compared to what happened under the waves of the Atlantic off the coast of Florida and Cuba. > In October 1962, the Soviet Submarine B-59 was operating in the region. It was part of a Soviet flotilla dispatched to support Cuba. This mission was a critical component of the USSR’s strategic operations in the region, meant to challenge the U.S. naval blockade and deter any potential invasion of Cuba. And it should be noted: the Soviet Union’s decision to place missiles in Cuba was largely a response to the United States’ deployment of Jupiter ballistic missiles in Turkey and Italy. These American missiles were capable of striking the Soviet Union, and placing missiles in Cuba was seen by the Soviets as a way to restore the strategic balance. The move was intended to deter the U.S. from a first-strike capability and to protect the Soviet ally, Cuba, from potential American aggression. > You might think that the Soviets’ reasoning was unwarranted and an example of “unprovoked aggression”, but this was absolutely the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s intention. It was the highest brass after all which proposed Operation Northwoods. Proposed in March 1962, Operation Northwoods was a plan developed by the U.S. Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which suggested various covert operations and false-flag actions intended to justify a military intervention in Cuba. The plan included ideas such as staged terrorist attacks, hijackings, and other incidents to be blamed on the Cuban government. It sounds absolutely ridiculous, and people usually don’t believe me at first, but our leaders’ plan was literally to kill a bunch of our own civilians, then blame it on Cuba (and the USSR) in order to rally around the flag and justify an unnecessary war which would have surely led to the use of nukes. Thankfully for all of mankind, President John F. Kennedy rejected the proposal, and it was never implemented. originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/601179
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
The SCOTUS Chevron Decision: Pros and Cons > “Judicial capture” is likely more difficult than regulatory capture. Judges in the US are not quite so easily tempted or bribed as are regulatory officials. The relative difficulty of performing judicial capture has a good side in a post Chevron legal environment, this could make it harder for entrepreneurs to use regulatory powers against rivals. Consequently, the US economy could become more competitive without Chevron. However, judges are now empowered to interpret regulations in ways that may or may not be reasonable, that may be shaped by their own ideological beliefs, and may in some cases effectively socialize some businesses. > The Chevron decision may yield some positive benefits, or not. There is only one real solution to our problems with the regulatory state; deregulation. Those who perceive the benefits of free markets should focus on the goal of repealing more regulations, and not worry about who defines or wields regulatory powers. originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/601155
kepford's avatar
kepford 1 year ago
What I learned. No matter who wins the US and or democracy will be over. #clownshow