Not a criticism, but why do Australians have to put beetroot on everything
Sir λ 🇦🇺 :verified:
Sabex_at_noagendasocial.com@mostr.pub
npub1pjgv...fd5l
Proud Mercian NA producer in ɹǝpu∩ uʍop uoᴉʇɐN oɯʇᴉפ.
Officially made a Boner Guy on 2021-01-07.
I identify as a 4th level Gnome Fighter.
Confirmed speciesist, shitposter, heathen and memelord.
DISCLAIMER: I am not a legal, financial or medical professional.
MAGA: Make Andrews Go Away
Fedi Influencer as of 18-04-23
⚡odorouslinda78@walletofsatoshi.com
Bought me a borgar smasher for the purposes of smashing borgars.
Gonna have to do borgar at the weekend now.

Fucken global warming man
Melbourne shivers through coldest August morning in five years
https://www.9news.com.au/national/melbourne-shivers-through-coldest-august-morning-in-five-years/a9b221f0-f5a3-483d-bec3-d0c21fce502c
I'm basically 5 all the time


@npub1v4tn...w5q2 waiting for a female European cyclist at the finish line

Hey Ivor, Watcha doin?





Still Ancap AF fr fr


Looks like the libertarian candidate in Argentina is doing pretty well.
How libertarian == far right is beyond me
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/argentina-set-primary-vote-with-ruling-peronists-fighting-survival-2023-08-13/

And I'll do it again




Citing extensive data to support their case, William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong.


X (formerly Twitter)
Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) on X
“Citing extensive data to support their case, William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, profess...