Bitcoin is not digital gold.
Gold was mentioned twice in the white paper in relation to how new Bitcoin is created, and how it is similar to how gold is added to the market.
Bitcoin is not digital gold.
Gold was mentioned twice in the white paper in relation to how new Bitcoin is created, and how it is similar to how gold is added to the market.
This game of telephone in the definition of "digital gold" has led tradfi to deeply misunderstand Bitcoin.
If AI is deflationary and we move into a world of more abundance. Won't that make the scarce things that AI cannot affect the availability of more valuable?
The reply section on X is almost useless at this point because of AI. The entire time I am reading replies I am asking myself if this account is AI or not.
The only time I'm not is if I know the account. There is a growing premium on being human.
I've tried to hear out the other side in earnest. But the main stream financial experts have never said anything compelling against Bitcoin. It's all undereducated BS.
Most people don't need the daily News told to them using a Bitcoin lens. Once you understand the inevitability and use case of Bitcoin the only other things you need are education in self-custody, node running, and other acts of sovereignty. Anything else is short-term noise.
Stable coins are surveillance tech.
Crypto is fiat reimagined.
ETFs are paper and aim to centralize holding of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin in self custody is protection, freedom, and the revolution.
A real question here we should be asking.
Is there another Epstein operating now?
Or has it simply been replaced by data collection and tech companies?