Peter Alexander's avatar
Peter Alexander
npub1yy3u...kawc
China 30 year veteran Joined Nostr at block 777177
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 11 months ago
Important to keep in mind that China hasn’t even started playing hardball. This is just the obvious response to “Liberation Day” activities. This goal for now in Beijing is to find out what cards Trump is playing with. How far does he intend to go. When that road ends, then China drops the hammer.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 11 months ago
Back with a China Morning Missive This one is simple. There will be no TikTok deal if Trump makes it a quid pro quo. The Chinese know he could just as easily reverse any agreement made. I’m expecting the Chinese to refuse to play ball and the best case scenario is for the can to be kicked down the road. 60% of ByteDance is foreign owned. The Chinese would rather let it all burn to the ground than submit to demands by Trump. https://www.reuters.com/technology/trump-says-china-could-get-tariff-relief-if-it-approves-tiktok-deal-2025-04-03/
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 11 months ago
Fuck me. I’m exhausted. Three weeks of pure running and gunning. Love Nostr. Love the Nostr fam.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 0 years ago
Was back on CNBC last week and I remain gobsmacked at the 180-degree turn in sentiment towards China. Honestly, it wasn’t even a year ago and a clip of mine like this would have a comment section filled with nothing but “how much does the Party pay you?” I’m beginning to think that years upon years of trotting out the same cast of characters, all of whom promised that China was on the precipice of collapse, no longer carries any credibility. I mean, there does need to come a time when accountability finally takes hold, yes? image
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Morning Missive I’m taking the under on this bet. What does make me laugh though is that it was just last week that the media was saying, first, that Trump and Xi would meet in Beijing in June. Then reports surfaced that Trump might be headed to China “as early as next month”. Now we have this. Here’s what I’m confident is actually going on. First, it is more than reasonable to expect that there’s been a degree of backchanneling between the two countries in an attempt to secure something tangible so that the two leaders can meet. The difference, however, is that Beijing isn’t playing the same games as Canada, the EU or the other Trump targets. Beijing is all but certainly slow rolling any sort of commitment to Trump. The longer China can drag out these backchanneling efforts, the higher the odds rise that a time will come where Beijing is in a genuine position to bargain. More to the point, time is on Beijing’s side and is not on the side of Washington.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Morning Missive Looks as though Beijing is trying to bring out the big guns. Late last night came a detailed directive specifically targeting increasing household consumption. Truth be told, this is really nothing more than policy makers attempting to jawbone the Chinese citizenry. That said, what does look to be the primary focus is a revving up of the “wealth effect”. What I mean by this is specific wording in the directive that both property and stocks are to be supported by central government policy. Explains why the Chinese stock market decently jumped on Friday. Expecting more once markets open here in less than an hour. Again, not the biggest fan of the SCMP, but this article does do a decent job of laying out the plans announced.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
So it would appear as though American “industrial policy” is really nothing more than regulatory capture. I mean, how else is Sam Altman supposed to justify his BILLIONS of what may just be a complete waste of money. The fact that OpenAI of all groups is pushing against the open source DeepSeek model shows, at least to me, that even after two months there is no competitive response. Dammed no matter what option he takes, so Altman resorts to wrapping himself in the Red, White and Blue.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Morning Missive Not exactly sure that Trump has played all that much of a role in the recent China equities rally. The more I think on this thesis the more I see it as pretty nonsensical. There’s no question that the Hong Kong market has returned to life after multiple years of underperformance. The driver, however, has been a return of retail Chinese investors allocating to risk. The catalyst for this return is the “DeepSeek” trade. Ever since that AI model ravaged its way into the global zeitgeist, Chinese investors decided to plow head on into all tech related equities. Perhaps no better example of this than Alibaba. There’s also the fact that Chinese stocks have been trading at insanely cheap valuations, especially as compared to their peers in the United States. The only question which remains is whether, this time, the return of Chinese retail investors to the stock market will remain. Multiple times over the past five years these investors have waded into the markets to try their luck at knife catching. Each time, thus far, those investors have walked away slashed and cut.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
While I’m sure David Bailey is a smart guy, he really has to pump the breaks on all of these “China is buying BTC” posts. Much as I shared last week, I’m fairly confident that China has been buying BTC for a number of years. Not in any size mind you, but to provide optionality. To borrow a phrase, China has been STAYING HUMBLE AND STACKING SATS. This is just how the Chinese decision makers do things here. What I can promise you is that no one is waking up anytime in the near future to find “China bidding Bitcoin in size”. image
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Morning Missive Here is everything you need to know about the power dynamic between American and #China. Senior executives from what is probably the single largest importer of Chinese goods, Walmart, traveled to meet with suppliers. The company’s objective was to “request” that its suppliers assume the full price impact of the Trump tariffs on China. Keep in mind that Walmart would have in place long term contracts with its Chinese suppliers meaning that it was seeking to renegotiate the terms of those contracts ….. unilaterally. While the media’s focus has shifted towards the China’s Ministry of Commerce “dressing down” the Walmart executives, the real issue is a demonstration of just how much power China has over the Trump tariff campaign. Here’s a mental exercise. What would happen to inventory levels at Walmart – or Amazon for that matter – if Chinese suppliers made the decision to simply stop producing and delivering goods for the American market? While that is a nuclear option, it is very much an option that was put very openly on display yesterday.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Morning Missive This is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg and it was probably a given that #China would first retaliate with agriculture tariffs. Where China can cause real pain, as just one example, is with a prohibition of medicinal exports to the United States including antibiotics. China has a stranglehold over the global supply chain not just for antibiotics, but for their active pharmaceutical ingredients. Think back on the mayhem caused in 2020 when supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE) dried up. That was China. Again, this is just one small, albeit important, example. The pain that China can inflict on America isn’t from putting tariffs on imports. The pain will come if, or perhaps when, China decides to put prohibitions on exports to America. Think rare earth minerals.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Afternoon Missive Gauging the direction of certain Chinese asset classes isn’t all that difficult. A benefit of the country having what is, in reality, a closed capital account. There’re equities, fixed income, cash or property. There is certainly some leakage into other markets, such as we are seeing of late with Chinese flows into Hong Kong stocks. Overall, however, these are either a temporary or marginal flows of funds. The vast majority moves in and out of the four highlighted above. The reason for bringing this issue up is that Chinese government bonds are now reversing the very trend that raged all last year. Bonds are being sold, and stocks are being bought. So much was made throughout 2024 that the yields of Chinese government bonds were in “freefall” – so said the business headlines and every macro trader – and the explanation was deemed simple. China faced a collapsing economy and, with that, the threat of a serious deflationary spiral. Yes, there was some of that. But the real engine driving yields down was the wall of Chinese money seeking the safety trade. And that is now reversing. Think about it. China just announced the first CPI deflation in years and yet government bond yields RISE? That just can’t be! The macro folks out there will need to come up with some sort of explanation. Just know, the reason why yields are rising is simply because Chinese investors are selling bonds and redeploying the capital into Stocks. Right now that would be heavily skewed towards Hong Kong. We will have to wait and see if that ends up expanding to include RMB denominated stocks in Shanghai or Shenzhen. Chinese government bond yields jump amid renewed economic hopes, rate cut delays
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Morning Missive Once again, deflation in #China is back in the headlines. The direction of pricing shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone given the continued path of “shock to the system” taken by policy makers. The only real question is whether these very same policy makers are willing to allow for real pain to persist at the household level for yet another year. While there is evidence that China’s economy is now past peak pessimism, there remains deep concerns if a turnaround is truly underway. I’ve no idea and, quite frankly, I doubt the leadership in Beijing has any idea either.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Morning Missive. With the greatest respect to Mr Bailey, what in God’s name are you talking about? Whoever is his source is simply looking to “talk up their book”. Moreover, this isn’t how the Chinese operate. My working thesis has centered on the Chinese initiating a relatively small position back in 2021 using the miner ban announcement to do so at lower pricing. This plays to the typical Chinese behavior of building optionality and at an appropriate time. A position size that is irrelevant if price goes to zero, but is sized enough to have some degree of impact if price were to move higher. What can be stated with near full confidence though is that you’ll never hear a word about whatever strategy Beijing has or is considering. Anyway, have a great weekend all. image
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Afternoon Missive One theme which has always amused me is just how many “experts” have predicted the collapse of the economy in #China. Decades of calls none of which have landed. Look around these days and it appears as though the G7 is where economic calamity is headed. European bond yields are blowing out for the second day in a row. image
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Morning Missive This is a truly fantastic article. A look at the sources of America’s trade deficit. What is most interesting is that for the month of January, the US recorded a massive – and record - $153bn deficit. That’s after reporting another, initial, record in December of $123bn. Again, that’s the trade deficit for goods for a single month. This was to be expected as American buyers (think Amazon and Walmart) would have clamored to finalize purchase agreements in advance of the Trump tariffs. It does, however, also go to show just how dangerously dependent American remains on other markets/countries for all that it consumes. Much as I’ve shared, even quite publicly, America produces virtually nothing. China produces virtually everything. And the point of Vietnam coming in second overall in terms of the US trade deficit goes to show just how aggressive and quickly Chinese manufactures were at moving capacity to other jurisdictions to avoid the original tariffs from back in 2018. This dynamic will not change at any time in the foreseeable future. While attempts have been made to create some sort of “industrial policy” in America, the execution of that policy has gone completely off the rails. The $30bn grant to Intel is but one perfect example.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China Weekend Missive Quite the contrast in geopolitical posturing over the past several days. While everyone has been intensely focused on the diplomatic breakdown at the White House, a completely different - and strategically relevant - meeting took place in Beijing. Just hours before the now infamous Trump/Zelensky meeting came reports of Xi Jinping convening his own meeting. His guest ….. Russian security envoy Sergei Shoigu. The messaging was direct and clear. While I’m not the biggest fan of the SCMP, you would be well served to read the article linked below in its entirety. Why I’m making that suggestion is given that there’s been little reporting of this meeting elsewhere. I suppose to be expected though as the entire affair in Washington has sucked out all the air out of the American discourse. All of this, the contrasting outcomes of the two events, demonstrates a stark difference in the operating mentality of American and Chinese leadership when engaging on the world stage be it with allies or adversaries.
Peter Alexander's avatar
prc30 1 year ago
China (long-ish) Morning Missive There’s a big meeting in Beijing next week and a meeting where expectations are being set for some sort of massive fiscal stimulus. There’ve even been some expecting a fiscal injection of 10% of GDP Allow me to state unequivocally that there is no “bazooka”. There never was one and there never will be. I will repeat once again, Keynes is Dead in China. It is true that the Beijing policy Mandarins will announce an expansion of the annual fiscal deficit. Last year the target was 3.0% then raised to 3.8% at mid-year. For 2025 the expectation is around 4%. A number of different categories of bond issuances will also be announced. A trillion or so Renminbi will be at the discretion of the central government. The bulk, however (+Rmb4.0tr), will address local government balance sheet and income statement issues. I will return to the latter of these two shortly. This all seems like a rather significant fiscal response. Again, it isn’t. Not on a net-net basis. To start, the focus and priority remains on addressing the bad debt throughout local governments. This is pure debt restructuring and will add zero fiscal stimulus to the economy. Then there is the one issue (income statement related) that I haven’t seen addressed anywhere in the analysis; the gaping hole in tax revenue. This is an issue for both the central and local governments. In fact, virtually all the funds which will be announced as allocations to local governments will either go to restructuring debt or as transfer payments for the direct purpose of meeting local budgetary obligations. The same holds for the elevated central government deficit spend. To clsoe the gap between expenditures and tax revenue. The figures may be large, even when combined together, but they are net-net zero stimulative to the economy. This does leave the trillion-plus in “Special Purpose Bonds”. I’m also confident that a proportion of the deficit spend will be at Beijing’s discretion. Here is where optionality comes into play. Beijing is still waiting patiently to assess the full extent of how it is the Trump administration intends to target China’s economy. A fiscal reserve of sorts, roughly a few trillion Renminbi, will be kept idle and applied as is deemed needed. Until that time, however, the focus will remain on the aggressive, systemwide deleveraging of the entire economy. Finally, not addressed is the likelihood of direct support to the Chinese household. That’s because, other than at the margins, there won’t be any. Direct to household stimulus would be completely ineffective. It would all just be recycled into bank savings. Maybe one day the credentialed class of economists will finally come to terms with their errors and adjusted their outlook on China accordingly. Unlikely at this point though.