F2 announces they will auction off “uncommon sats”
I suppose this is what F2 is doing with the 546 sats they split off the coinbase tx
What are the “uncommon” sats worth? Does it make sense to switch pools or solo-mine to capture “uncommon” sats? Might the value of “uncommon” sats push pool fees to zero? Intg to think abt
Interesting to think about empty blocks in this kind of fee environment.
Conventional wisdom suggests that once a block is found, while pools construct new block templates, just mine empty block templates until you have a real one.
This assumption relies on the idea that tx fees represent a relatively small part of the block reward.
What about when tx fees represent the majority of the block reward?
We almost saw this earlier. Block 778703 was mined by ViaBTC less than a minute after the previous block. The next block came two minutes following, and had 5.90btc of fees.
In the future, as subsidies get smaller and block rewards represent a larger part of miner revenue, its highly likely that, in addition to responding to bitcoin and electricity prices, miners will turn on and off depending on unconfirmed tx fees
High fee environments are such great learning experiences. Thousands of plebs learning in a live environment:
- UTXO management
- Fee rate management
- Using RBF
- Lightning channel management
- Segwit & Taproot
Wallets & services that abstract away these things may work in a low-fee empty mempool environment but either break or become very expensive in a high fee environment.
News from BitRiver that Russia has 1GW of Bitcoin mining capacity online. This is up about 50% since the end of 2022, when local rag Kommersant reported that there was 500MW online.
The rube goldberg fiat banking machine is failing before our eyes. CS AT1 holders, who are supposed to be senior to the equity, are getting wiped.
The old adage “don’t invest in what you don’t understand” becomes much more difficult when the rules are changed on the fly.
Bitcoin is not volatile.
The banks, which can blow up at any time, are volatile.
You think a 75% drawdown from the peak in Bitcoin is bad? Call investors in CS, they have a permanent loss on their holdings. -75% in a weekend.
Interesting letter from Coindesk backing into Bitcoin's development costs at $100-$200MM a year... which is insane to me. They get there by taking the number of total developers on bitcoin-related protects (circa 1,000) and multiplying by $100k-$200k... feels very high to me.