PART ONE: It’s inevitable that we will see more aggressive supple chain attacks or just outright infiltration to coerce companies to release malicious firmware updates or even malicious hardware. (ex: Ledger reseller CryptoBillis) —It never really occurred to me until Coldcard incident That hit pretty close to home as id been advising people to use Coldcard and Trezor for years. Here’s the “blurb” of what I’ve published about it. All of this is “assumptive” based on the citations provided. Even if I’m completely wrong, it’s totally plausible. —Thats the real point. “Switck deliberately introduced the weak-entropy flaw in Coldcard’s seed generation. A nation-state actor honeypotted him by exploiting his deviant sexual interests (he’s Trans), after which he reduced the available entropy just enough that ordinary collisions stayed improbable while still leaving the space searchable by anyone who later enumerated it. He disabled the hardware RNG build error so the misconfiguration produced no warning and appeared to be an ordinary amateur mistake. The same person signed the relevant GitHub commits under both the Switck and Peter D. Gray identities using one key, concealing that a single individual both wrote the vulnerable library and integrated it into production firmware.” Citations:

X (formerly Twitter)

switck (@switck) on X

Cypher all the things. She/he/his/hers.

(bio: She/he/his/hers)

X (formerly Twitter)

hodlonaut (@hodlonaut) on X

“The migration was not indiscriminate, and that is the strangest thing about it. Of the seven places in the firmware that drew on the hardware ...

X (formerly Twitter)

hodlonaut (@hodlonaut) on X

The code wouldn't compile, so the Coldcard dev DISABLED THE HARDWARE RNG (Random Number Generation) to make the error go away. 🤯 "From here, I ...

X (formerly Twitter)

James O'Beirne (@jamesob) on X

Very interesting. Looks like strong possibility that `switck`, the account writing the buggy libngu library that caused all this, was actually Pete...

All of this was done within a btc price window of ~$75-$125k What about when btc is $500k? $1mil ? Buckle up. I don’t think anyone is paranoid enough when it comes to self custody. 🧡👊🏻🍻 ⚡️⚡️3 digit zaps for reposts that reply here⚡️⚡️

Id have shit myself

I was just looking at the protein my sister bought on Amazon and noticed that you need TWO scoops (70 grams total) to get the 32grams of protein advertised. Here’s comparing the generic whey I buy in bulk that gives me 25 grams for ONE 33 gram scoop. (120 calories) That’s like HALF filler in MM. -W -T -F Here’s what’s making up the difference: Maltodextrin and a non dairy creamer made from sunflower oil and more maltodextrin, —That's where the 270 calories comes from. So not only is MM ripping you off, they’re feeding you seed oils and simple carbs. 🧡👊🏻🍻

This is probably the funniest thing on the internet today So OpenAI spends $21M in tokens racing to announce they’ve solved the Navier–Stokes approach. (An unsolved 100yr old Millennium Prize) NYU cries foul: their unpublished work had been scooped by Sam Altman/OAI and CO AFTER ALL THAT: —The proof doesn’t verify. The model hallucinated parts of the argument. 🤣😂🤣😂 Ultimate irony. 🍻

X (formerly Twitter)

Valerio Capraro (@ValerioCapraro) on X

BREAKING: OpenAI’s solution to Navier–Stokes does not match its Lean verification. The most important article to read today is not one of Open...

Super interesting comment post by Joe Burnett today. A Johns Hopkins cryptography professor post suggested that: “we might lose public key cryptography.” (I’ll post the full text in the comments for any that don’t click on X links) —Well worth the read if you’re interested in the quantum threat to bitcoin and why it’s important to not reuse bitcoin addresses. “The attacker needs your public key. If your public key is already exposed, your coins would be vulnerable to this kind of breakthrough. If it remains hidden, this specific attack requires that key to become exposed. Glassnode’s May 2026 analysis estimated that roughly 70% of issued BTC had no public-key exposure on-chain. For addresses that hide the public key, spending reveals it. Reusing that address afterward leaves any remaining or newly received coins exposed. Avoiding address reuse is best practice.” 🧡👊🏻🍻

X (formerly Twitter)

Joe Burnett, MSBA (@IIICapital) on X

A Johns Hopkins cryptography professor just suggested that “we might lose public key cryptography.” What would an AI mathematics breakthrough ...

What happened SIX years, SIX months, and SIX days ago? 🤔 “April 1, 2020, fell in the early surge of the COVID-19 pandemic. The United States had become the country with the most confirmed cases (roughly 180,000–200,000) and its reported death toll had passed 4,000, exceeding China’s official total at the time. Daily U.S. deaths that day were among the highest recorded so far, with some counts exceeding 700–900. The White House coronavirus task force projected that even with continued social distancing, 100,000 to 240,000 Americans could die. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued a statewide stay-at-home order that day.” 🧡👊🏻🍿