Sovereign is inward and upward, parasovereign is outward and downward.

Bitcoin and Nostr are not chaos. They are highly structured left-hand orders — ordered, but outside sovereign legibility. They are not “unruly,” but they are illegible to the sovereign’s symbolic hierarchy. This is what makes them parasovereign: they sustain order without reference to the sovereign state.

Bitcoin and Nostr are left-handed.

Be ornery!

Bitcoin’s future isn’t guaranteed by difficulty, decentralization, or incentives alone. It survives because people act to keep it on-mission. If you won’t fight drift, you’re letting it die. Steward it, or lose it. @Bitcoin Mechanic #bitcoin

Inscriptions aren’t the core issue—they’re a symptom. The real fight is over whether users will defend Bitcoin’s purpose, or accept whatever emerges from neglect, miner incentives, and parasitism. Culture shapes code. Complacency is capture. #bitcoin

I’ve said it before, echoing Mark 2:27: “Bitcoin was made for people, not people for Bitcoin.” Praxeology: in an engineered system, means (code, protocol, rules) serve the end (human monetary freedom). Get that backwards, and you become a subject of the system, not its user.

Bitcoin isn’t a god. It’s an engineered parasovereign system, built for one purpose: sound money via unmediated P2P exchange. Ref: @Bitcoin Mechanic, YouTube, 13 Aug 2025 — he warns: Bitcoin doesn’t “fix itself.” It’s stewarded, or it drifts.

A lot of people emit opinions here but can’t defend them logically, much less present empirical evidence.

You should check out Primal.