Even with all the implicit and explicit yield curve control, bond yields are slowly rising.
I am of the opinion that the Controllers can prolong the fiat ponzi for much longer than most think, but will eventually decide to rug.
Why? Because all fiat currencies eventually fail, and the Controllers will definitely decide to fail the current financial system in a carefully preplanned fashion to avoid excess chaos.
If markets were efficient, bond yields would be in the double digits (and then most would realize that with current debt levels this is game over).
However, markets are efficient to constraints.
Most of the bond holders in the system are captive - meaning they are aware that it is a mathematical certainty they will get robbed if they buy bonds, but they are forced to.
So bond yields are fake and managed, just like the prices of most, if not all, assets.
Yield Curve Control (YCC) = Central Bank commits to cap yields on some part of the curve (say 10Y at 4.25%). If yields try to rise above the cap, Central Bank buys bonds in unlimited size to enforce the level.
It's a way to say:
"Beyond this point, the bond market no longer gets to vote on our fiscal/monetary mix."
Yield Curve Control is the bridge that lets the Controllers carry an insane nominal debt pile through inflation surges, regime shifts, and crises, without allowing yields to reflexively spike and force default.
With YCC, the curve is no longer a sensor; it's a policy-controlled output.
You often hear about explicit YCC (Japan style), but the whole fake fiat system is designed around implicit YCC.
The logical question is:
- "Who are these rich retards who keep buying bonds and keep getting robbed just so they can fund their own enslavement?"
Most people/companies who have lots of money usually know that owning bonds is a losing proposition, so you have to force them to buy your useless paper.
States design the rules so that banks, insurers, pensions, and autopilot funds end up long bonds, and then bonds get expropriated in real terms.
This is the path of least resistance.
Retail with direct bonds is rounding error.
So the bondholders are the institutional skeleton that anchors the regime: states, banks, pensions, insurers, big funds, and foreign sovereigns.
Why them?
Because they are controllable, slow, diffuse, and essential. They can't easily run, can't easily revolt, and can be quietly sheared to fund whatever comes next (AI governance).
I am of the opinion that the Controllers can prolong the fiat ponzi for much longer than most think, but will eventually decide to rug.
Why? Because all fiat currencies eventually fail, and the Controllers will definitely decide to fail the current financial system in a carefully preplanned fashion to avoid excess chaos.
If markets were efficient, bond yields would be in the double digits (and then most would realize that with current debt levels this is game over).
However, markets are efficient to constraints.
Most of the bond holders in the system are captive - meaning they are aware that it is a mathematical certainty they will get robbed if they buy bonds, but they are forced to.
So bond yields are fake and managed, just like the prices of most, if not all, assets.
Yield Curve Control (YCC) = Central Bank commits to cap yields on some part of the curve (say 10Y at 4.25%). If yields try to rise above the cap, Central Bank buys bonds in unlimited size to enforce the level.
It's a way to say:
"Beyond this point, the bond market no longer gets to vote on our fiscal/monetary mix."
Yield Curve Control is the bridge that lets the Controllers carry an insane nominal debt pile through inflation surges, regime shifts, and crises, without allowing yields to reflexively spike and force default.
With YCC, the curve is no longer a sensor; it's a policy-controlled output.
You often hear about explicit YCC (Japan style), but the whole fake fiat system is designed around implicit YCC.
The logical question is:
- "Who are these rich retards who keep buying bonds and keep getting robbed just so they can fund their own enslavement?"
Most people/companies who have lots of money usually know that owning bonds is a losing proposition, so you have to force them to buy your useless paper.
States design the rules so that banks, insurers, pensions, and autopilot funds end up long bonds, and then bonds get expropriated in real terms.
This is the path of least resistance.
Retail with direct bonds is rounding error.
So the bondholders are the institutional skeleton that anchors the regime: states, banks, pensions, insurers, big funds, and foreign sovereigns.
Why them?
Because they are controllable, slow, diffuse, and essential. They can't easily run, can't easily revolt, and can be quietly sheared to fund whatever comes next (AI governance).
It seems to me the US is using this war because they need a plausible reason to step down from dollar hegemony ( 
Unfortunately, UBI is going to be inevitable.
And UBI is not just "free money" as Elon would like you to believe. It's a control rail to manage the losers of the reset, stabilize consumption and harden behavioral obedience.
Unfortunately, it's not about "ending poverty" 😂
UBI is a centrally engineered, always-on income stream from the State to individuals, delivered through traceable digital channels, with conditions hiding inside the surrounding system (ID, tax, social credit, eligibility rules).
UBI is going to be perfect for soft policing:
- Carrot: "Behave, and your floor is guaranteed."
- Stick: "Break certain rules (tax, "health", speech, protest in the wrong way), and administratively you can be investigated, delayed, or temporarily cut off."
It is a perfect on-ramp to the CBDC + ID stack. "To get your UBI, you must:"
- register your digital wallet,
- verify your ID,
- keep your biometrics up to date,
- accept the terms (AML, travel-rule, etc.).
That brings everyone into the rails they already want for tax, surveillance, and capital controls.
So essentially, UBI = social shock absorber + behavioral throttle after they've run the Great Reset.
4. Reallocate wealth upward and outward
- from consumers to producers,
- from importers to exporters,
- from weak countries to hard-currency/commodity powers,
- from households to states and systemically important firms.
So oil is more than an "inflation input". It is a transfer mechanism.
Oil is one of the most efficient system-wide coercion levers because it hits:
- households,
- firms,
- currencies,
- rates,
- and sovereign stability
all at once.
The Controllers use it to:
- extract purchasing power invisibly,
- discipline labor and weaker states,
- create inflation justification,
- trigger asset repricing,
- consolidate ownership,
- and preserve optionality for the eventual patch/reset.
To be clear, I'm not saying they perfectly control every print. They do it through:
- shipping and insurance friction,
- underinvestment,
- producer coordination,
- sanctions and waivers,
- reserve releases/refills,
- refinery/product bottlenecks,
- futures/plumbing influence,
- and dollar-liquidity interaction.
The leader of the "opposition" then proceeded to convince his people to inject themselves with poison to protect them from a virus that doesn't exist.
Of course, like every other leader that matters, he's part of the club.
There's no solution from within the system.
The solution is: keep your health and wealth outside the system and stay armed to be able to defend yourself and your loved ones.
Try to be more self-sufficient every month. Be more Amish.
History rhymes.
The Controllers have repeatedly:
- overloaded the claim-stacks,
- centralized ledgers and custody,
- detonated a crisis at a convenient time,
- swept / rewritten claims,
- and rebooted the same control architecture with upgraded rails.
It's not a matter of if but when.
At some point, more and more people will stop playing games that cannot be won (at scale) which will inevitably speed up the execution of the script.
The "everything bubble" was used for the AI governance buildout (a.k.a the AI bubble if you listen to mainstream media).
The AI governance buildout is in its late stages and debt levels are rapidly rising. We might be nearing the Great Reset.
