Someone remind this chart that "it's just math" and "there can only ever be 21M". The "hashrate up = security up" narrative is also dead - and for good reasons.

Every single aspect of Disney child grooming is Jewish

A short story on how Central Bankers view gold Central Banker: Gold is a useless, shiny, yellow rock without yield. It is so irrelevant that we (the US Treasury) still uses an accounting price of $42.22 per troy ounce for its gold reserves on the federal balance sheet (unchanged since 1973). Citizen: Then why do Central Banks store, secure, transport and accumulate tens of trillions of dollars of gold? Central Banker: Because of tradition. h3h3h3!!!1 Meanwhile a Wikileaks release from the United States Congressional Research service: - "The continued willingness of the U.S. government to hold a large underutilized stock of gold is, perhaps, best understood as a hedge against times of severe economic crisis when paper assets could be useless." Crazy prediction: Before the end of 2033, Bitcoin gets exposed as goy gold (digital decoy for physical gold). More context:

Why I think the government created Bitcoin (and a few predictions)

Why I think the Controllers created Bitcoin and more importantly my predictions for how the next few years unfold.

Now that the BIP-110 saga is over, it's probably a good time to reflect. In my opinion, BIP-110 failing is long-term good for BIP-110 supporters. The BIP-110 question was: - OK, Bitcoin mining is insanely centralized, so are the 5 mining pools (who share the same boss) going to get an order to do nothing, or will they be instructed to pretend that nodes actually matter? From my old post "Who holds the Power in the Bitcoin ecosystem (does your node matter" - (

Who holds the Power in the Bitcoin ecosystem (does your node matter)

Bitcoin does not run on ideals; it runs on coordination between code, hash, and liquidity — and those are controlled by a few dozen institutional...

): - Bitcoin does not run on ideals; it runs on coordination between code, hash, and liquidity — and those are controlled by a few dozen institutional actors who can synchronize quickly. Core defaults + pool templates + venue policies decide reality. Users matter only when they can coordinate economic liquidity, which is rare. Expect future changes to follow the same political playbook. In that post, I put "ordinary user nodes" last in the power stack. If BIP-110 had succeeded based on decentralization theater and misguided "game theory" circus, BIP-110 supporters would still be living a lie. Stop listening to boomer Bitcoiners who tell you that "Bitcoin is decentralized and secure" and do some of your own research. Bitcoin is not decentralized and secure, it was simply allowed to look that way (

Is Bitcoin decentralized & secure or is it allowed to look that way

Bitcoin is permissionless in code but permissioned in practice by choke-points that governments and large intermediaries either directly control or...

). Until you realize that we live under something very close to a One World Government (

How I know we live under a One World Government

The US, China and Russia are building interoperable programmable, surveilled money, programmable, surveilled movement, programmable, surveilled spe...

), your attempts at game theory are worse than useless. Most people are just too mentally weak to face our current reality and would rather live a lie. To understand why Bitcoin will fail as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange, read this article (

Bitcoin will fail as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange

When we look at the past 5-10 years, Bitcoin’s trajectory is quite clear. Capture goes up, freedom goes down.

). And no, "firing the miners" will not be nearly enough. To understand why Bitcoin was most likely created by the government, read this article (

Why I think the government created Bitcoin (and a few predictions)

Why I think the Controllers created Bitcoin and more importantly my predictions for how the next few years unfold.

). If you are too heavily into Bitcoin and down bad on your position, I hope our jewish overlords give Saylor a $1 trillion loan at 0% interest so he can pump the BTC price. Then, more people will focus on what actually matters: - your health, your community, your skills, your adaptability, tools, machinery, weapons, self-sufficiency, gold, silver, Monero (if you need digital cash), land that produces food, energy, local services, cattle, etc. Usually, as the governability of the holder base of an asset increases (more captured, more in the system), our fiat overlords are more incentivized to pump its fiat-denominated price. ( This is of course an oversimplification. ) If Bitcoin's fiat price pumps, most Bitcoiners will quickly forget that BTC is a captured asset, so you usually get fiat gains as a gift for being a good, little goy. In another post, I'll cover how I got lucky and sold 85% of my BTC at 113K and the remaining 15% at 95K. (Basically my opinion on why the Bitcoin cycle exists) I'd only use Bitcoin for speculating (trying to mine fiat), and as of now, I'm staying away because I don't think that the incoming Quantum scam is priced in (

A Quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin

A serious quantum-resistance upgrade for Bitcoin would be one of the most complex, politically loaded, and coordination-fragile events in its history.

).

Black man exposes the Jews for sucking baby penises: Proof:

Just sitting here on this pear-shaped, wet rock, spinning at 1,000 mph and traveling through space at 66,600 mph. This would have been impossible if nothing didn't explode and turn into everything, enabling us to evolve from pond scum. Thank God these scientists figured everything out for me so I don't have to think for myself 🙏

Just got debanked for the first time. Randomly got a notification that 100K euro have been transferred from my account. Went to the local bank, and the lady told me they've decided to close my account. When I asked why, she told me "We don't have to give you any reason. We can just close your account.". Told her I want to transfer my 100K euro to a different bank, and she told me that the money is no longer in my account, so she has to ask whether they'll allow me to transfer it 😂 It is a good reminder that a deposit is a loan you make to a bank. You are an unsecured creditor of the bank, not the owner of any specific asset the bank holds. They can just fuck with you. Had to wait ~1 for the central office to give me permission to transfer my money to another bank, then had to pay 15 EUR for my bank statement since they already closed my online banking 😂 I use bank deposits because I must (payments, interface with the system), but this is a good reminder not to confuse them with survival capital in this rotten regime. Banks are just a state-dependent intermediary and the state is the enemy.

Bitcoin is now ~18 years old and still practically unusable as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange. It hasn't been improving. In fact, it's gotten worse as non-custodial MoE over the years (

How Bitcoin's developers are attacking its Sovereign/Monetary use

Cheaper witness, friendlier data-paths, RBF normalization, relay policies favoring deep pockets, and node-operator liability drift tilt Bitcoin tow...

). In the last few months, I've often wondered where would we be if we had spent the last 18 years stacking physical gold and silver and had worked more on that front. We'd have easily engineered silver shortages and squeezed the fuck out of bombs, EV, solar panel producers. Lots of silver is also needed to build the physical infrastructure to power, cool and connect AI data centers for the One World Government surveillance state. The paper gold/silver markets are enormous and very tightly managed by our One World Government. We could've definitely done some damage and exposed their paper games by stacking physical. If you look into the Coordination Tax, you'll realize that Bitcoin will inevitably fail as mass, non-custodial MoE (

Bitcoin will fail as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange

When we look at the past 5-10 years, Bitcoin’s trajectory is quite clear. Capture goes up, freedom goes down.

). The Coordination Tax is how the Controllers manage Bitcoin (smaller scale), but also how they manage society (larger scale). The Coordination tax in Bitcoin is the recurring human + legal + distribution cost to keep the Policy (relay/mempool defaults, mining templates, wallet behaviors), Perimeter (banks, clouds, app stores, ISPs, payment networks, tax, law, PR) aligned with the Protocol's (consensus rules, Proof-of-Work) ideals. The Coordination Tax in society is the recurring total cost of getting large numbers of humans with different incentives, different information, different risk tolerances, different time horizons, and different status games to act as one organism across time. If you do a deeper dive, you'll realize that it's very likely that the government created Bitcoin (

Why I think the government created Bitcoin (and a few predictions)

Why I think the Controllers created Bitcoin and more importantly my predictions for how the next few years unfold.

). See screenshot below for TL;DR. If you gave me the task to "orange-pill" someone today. This is my best attempt: 1) Bitcoin might go up in fiat terms (NGU). 2) The CIA, Mo$$ad, MI6 crew really need Bitcoin because it isn't private by default, it isn't fungible, it is becoming more and more custodied by default and paperized. They certainly don't want to alienate everyone into physical gold/silver, or Monero. 3) If you need to transfer your wealth across borders, Bitcoin is very liquid and definitely a good option. I wouldn't try to sell them on "digital cash". Monero is clearly better as digital cash. Monero will however also get psyoped into "quantum-resistance" upgrade scams and many of the hardware wallets (as with Bitcoin) are very likely backdoored. Monero is more Coordination Tax-optimized than Bitcoin, but it won't be enough. If the Coordination Tax were a person, it'd be this guy. Unfortunately, he remains undefeated.

The DARPA "entrepreneurs" reading from the same script as always 😂 But guys, I thought Elon Musk and Sam Altman hated each other 😂 They've already sold their souls and they're trying to take as many people with them as possible. The Amish always knew not to play their Jewish, Satanic games. Their goal: a One World government that fully replaces God. Government replaces God when it becomes the highest practical authority over meaning, morality, safety, identity, money, speech, movement, family, life, death, forgiveness, punishment, and the future. The test is simple: - Can you say "God says no" and still live? The more the answer becomes "not really", the more the replacement has already happened.

AI videos are getting good. If it weren't for the car glitching at the 9 seconds mark, I wouldn't be able to tell. I'd imagine governments have had access to AI for at least a couple of decades now and are only releasing the scuffed version to the plebs. They'll probably pull out digital IDs once we get to the AI-generated videos that can't be distinguished from real. You always have to wonder - why am I getting access to this technology now? Most of the time it isn't because a cool, nerd hacker invented it in his mom's basement.

They are already on their back-up plan. Banks are lending billions to Caiman Islands hedge funds who then buy trillions of Treasuries on leverage while the Fed and the Treasury keep volatility low so the hedge funds don't blow up. After the reset: - the petrodollar falls, - Gold is the top-level settlement asset for blocs, - CBDCs are the day-to-day money, - and almost everything else is a revocable license. So they certainly have a back-up plan. Hope you do as well.

Don't know what to think of this one 😂 Not sure if coincidence or not. If Bitcoin doesn't comply, they'll eventually have to suspend dividends and this thing will tank.

The professor Jiang character is very interesting. Graduated Yale university and used to work for the UN (aka the One World Government organization that sponsors child trafficking and genocide by vaccines). He was suspected by the Chinese government of spying in 2002 and was deported 😂 Going viral organically doesn't really work in 2026. Platforms like Twitter, Youtube, TikTok, only promote content that pushes the official narrative (so plants and useful idiots). After watching a few of his videos, I think it is very likely he is an intelligence asset (most likely CIA). He could be a useful idiot but I find this less likely based on his takes. It was much easier for intelligence agencies to control people's access to information pre-Covid. Many more people used to watch mainstream media, but the CIA pushed the propaganda too far. Once different networks started repeating the same script word for word, people stopped watching and lost trust. The CIA knew they needed to keep control of the narrative, so they started pushing certain "independent media" personalities. Tucker Carlson (CIA) got "fired" by Fox news (even though he had the highest ratings 😂) just because people stopped watching TV and the CIA needs him to reach more people. In many cases, even when professor Jiang is likely correct about his conclusions, his argumentation is so flawed that he ends up pushing people away from the "conspiracy theory". Watching some of his recent videos remind me of the recent podcast with Joe Rogan and Theo Von. The whole podcast looked like a hostage video. Both completely compromised (especially Rogan) and terrified to not say something they shouldn't say. Professor Jiang is a bit more subtle than these guys, but I still find it unlikely he's a useful idiot based on his interviews. The "this is extremely dangerous to our democracy" moment is probably when the CIA knew they had to focus on pushing the "independent" media personalities. Controlling the media is at the core of the protocols of the learned elders of Zion. The CIA hasn't given up on propaganda now that mainstream media is cooked (only watched by boomers, retards, and retarded boomers).