I am sort of OK to give a little discount on Bitcoin for the new people growing up. But not too much and not for too long. That is keeping in mind that obviously I have not had fiat to buy the dips for myself for a while already. But I certainly hate doing discounts for the undeserving cases, such that have no interpersonal skills, no ability to identify trustworthy people in time and act with their own money on it, such that want to jump into the train only after everyone are elected (against their vote for transchildren nonsense) and everything signed into law. Then they want cheap sats. It makes me sick giving discounts for these. I mean, if you already had savings in at least 2021 (El Salvador, Trump Q and friends' hints, middle of covid and fiscal absurdities), you did not buy then, but want a discount now after strategic bitcoin reserve? How is that supposed to be fair?

Head and shoulders on 30min, or did I start to hallucinate?

lol. On Bitfinex the price does not even go down to those ridiculous levels. Based.

Guys (and some girls), did you know that sex doesn't really exist, and you don't really want it? It was all just a psyop, indoctrination. The monks were right all along...

It seems that anything originating from the evil Roman empire of thugs, shortcutters, progressives, sexists and hedonists (all in the same each person) is bad or at least not great. Basically slower or faster leading to hell. Christianity Judaism Islam (attempt to reform and improve the others, but not good enough) Interest rates All rulers approved by Pope or any other reformed christians (also attempt to improve, but not good enough). Centralization Pizza Pasta Alcohol. (Almost) rotten meat. Insincere excessive communication. That does not mean everything outside of Roman influence is good or does not have some of the same features, but it seems most others have less than 50% evil, and therefore goes to heaven faster or slower.

All rituals of any religious, political, scientific or whatever visibly or invisibly, centrally or decentrally organized movement are bad. Individualistic only. Any collectyvist approach where at least one individual does not operate the entire knowledge of the entire universe and is not in control of the entire universe is bad. Literally.

Isn't it simpler to just say guarantee rather than risk of 100%? N.b. world = globalists = what they call democracy. https://truthsocial.com/@WatcherGuru/114003150130872271

Also, I am sick of normies still not accepting sats for goods and services. You can't reason with them. We need to push stronger.

Back in the day there were a number of people expecting BTC to go down to 14k. Now we are mocking those. But why? What would have gone wrong if it did go to 14k, everyone produced evidence that now is the real bottom, and then it went up? Why do we have to fool somebody to feel good? Now some are afraid it might go down to 80k. Why not let it go down, then all trumps, mstrs, keisers, all miners and everyone come out and say that is the bottom, there will be SBR, they will not sell for less, and will buy if anybody tries to? Why not? Why not let all the smart enough ones to go leveraged long, pump the price, and leave the nocoiners poor? What am I missing? The poor will not starve. We will just force them to accept sats for the goods they produce. That is it. And we will not enslave them. Just because that is not what we are. Is it not clear yet that the ones with coins already and with knowledge and experience enough to use leverage are the best ones to have all the power, while the ones with no coins will do best without it? WTF? An honest question that demands an in detail answer.