YES: The world still needs a neutral, censorship resistant reliable money. Bitcoin exists Thesis still intact

Theoretically : If one takes a good size UTXO (2-3 million sats) and opens up lightening channel. Then spends it down over say 1-2 years on say coffee and beers...... What is the onchain footprint for this? What do chain-analizers see as it is spent down?

Now you just sue for 1 billion... inflation

Softbank should have cashed out of NVIDIA ponzi and stacked with 21/Mallers.

Monoparty. Both sides now claiming "affordability" mandate Only way will be to print to meet _promises_. This will of course make things worse; slightly better in the short term; much worse in the long-term. They for sure won't take the hard road of letting the economy reset on a more discipline fiscal policy. Opt out, buy the coin

Buying the coin Forever Ride or die

The hardest thing is to _keep it going_ In all things: relationships, businesses, sports dynasties; even keeping your home functional takes gardening/work. Many cannot stick with it. Those that do become legends

If people are serious about wanting to limit spam. They should just build consensus around a fork to reduce block size.

https://fountain.fm/clip/6RHtVMuVaBkOP6FEm545 @ODELL can you explain/expand on this? "...specifically, one of the dynamics at play in this type of softfork scenario is that the softforked chain is restricting rules: they are reducing what you can spend. So anything mined on the softforked chain is still valid on the non-softfork chain. So theoretically at any point that chain could then reorg the other chain unless there was something actively done to prevent that reorg." which chain reorgs which one? what is actually done to *prevent* the reorg?

Wen polymarket for a softfork chain split?