I feel like this can definitely be done on nostr x3 #gaming #nostr

Made a thing for myself and thought i'd share a video about it. This isn't for product / this is more for me to see a visual of how a dnn node might work. I'd imagine once a competent dev gets on it, it'd take a month of development, a month of testing, a month of polish.View quoted note →

"why did you redeem it!" x3

xD

I've become tired enough of all of this that I went ahead to explore how bitcoin transactions are handled (code), and reached to a current understand where my initial thoughts, from years ago and to recently, on how all of this is ridiculous (from op_return to ordinals/other with witness), and feel like, at the risk of sounding stupid on virtual camera, I'll make a video about it. Gist of the video would basically be: "Bitcoin is about money. Why has it become more than that and is expanding on it?"

Was replying to someone, then the idea that Nostr is a "Hydra of Freedom" popped in my head x3

Btw, assuming all's good with this, we can have what people are used to: username and password login, along with a forget/change-password Here's the flow: View quoted note →

DNN: Decentralized Naming Network A Bitcoin-anchored naming system for nostr and the web. - Doesn't bloat Bitcoin (no data added to it). - Not a blockchain / there's no shitcoin. - Permissionless. - Censorship-resistant. - Scalable. - Cheap / no recurring payment. - Have whatever name you want and change it whenever you want. - Human-readable & human-memorable ID/address/true-name. - A lot of secondary-effect solutions and benefits that come out of this. Here's the slave ICANN site for it:

DNN

(^ links to the readme to read about it, along with the NIP-DN and node policy) Tell me what you think. This is a draft and might not go anywhere. Decided to share it with the public early, even before talks with people. Ask any questions or share any concerns or criticisms you may have. If this turns out to be a proper solution, then I'd continue developing it, assuming I'd have funds for it, or if devs come along to help develop it.

First talk concluded and marks the first "I'm not delusional" check x3 Another talk with more specialized people should be happening soon for a stronger check. Also, I realized that this solves nostr relay discovery between users and clients. Meaning no more continuous extensive relay management, and no need for outbox model (if I'm understanding everything right). View quoted note →

Played Arc Raiders. I like it. But I'll only get it once/if it'll have a pve only mode. Also, similar to The Finals, ugly models.

The more I'm refining the idea, writing the protocol readme, the NIP and its kinds, the **** policy, the more I'm getting confident in it actually being "it" / the actual end solution (or rather the best solution so far) that the might actually get off the ground and reach mass adoption. I'm hoping I can finish the presentation for it to show other close devs this upcoming working week and get their opinion of it / confirm I'm not delusional with it, and if not and there would be what seems like hard blockers, I'd want to bounce with a couple of more people then share it publicly (I'll still share it publicly even if it ended up being a bad idea, so that others might learn and perhaps figure out a more appropriate solution). View quoted note →