I really hate (yes, hate) that I can't right-click a link on Jumble to open link in new tab (yes i'm aware of left-click open link).

Seems like my guess was right (don't recall if I said this as an online post or not), Bitcoin price would top around 120k and then would go down to around 70k. I forgot how I got those numbers but basically I was looking at past cycles and ballparking those numbers. I'm assuming in the next cycle the ath will be around 200k to 220k maybe, and the one after that probably 380k to 400k, then 700k to 750k, and so on.

@Zapstore hey, I recall seeing a post showcasing an experimental web tool/portal to publish apps to zapstore through it? I couldn't find it on your feed, so here I am asking if you can send it my way if possible.

"cloudflare protection is already decentralised" "Cloudflare having competitors is a bad thing" I did not expect to read such things. It honestly took me a bit back. You'd think this is trolling, but I'm not sure x3

This seems good??? Metal test too: Assuming they're legit (and it seems they are?), and it's been tested and showcased by known content creators, heck, I'd want a set FluxPose https://www.fluxpose.com/

I am saddened that I don't have IRL friends who are crazy about freedom as I am, or even normal freedom. In fact, I think one or two of them are authoritarians, and they tell "me" to calm down x3 But, I am happy that because of the internet, I met other crazy freedom people and conversed with them =3 (In general, but definitely more so here on nostr, and more so because of the projects I'm working on) And hopefully, I'll be super happy to be able to meet many of said crazy freedom people IRL, screaming freedom while eating a burger or something x3 (and that'd be well enough, anything else would be a bonus <3)

From: /users/npub18n4ysp43ux5c98fs6h9c57qpr4p8r3j8f6e32v0vj8egzy878aqqyzzk9r To: /users/nabcvintagecanal All decentralized, all permissionless, etc, assumingly more people start running it like how it's assumed people are running nostr relays. (My DNN ID will change, of course, and everyone else who would test it, once it properly goes live at a different bitcoin block height / the genesis block changes) I'll stop for now (until I have more money for AI, i basically spent what I earned from last month on this x3), but basically, there's the sync between DNN nodes function/system (and how to handle the 'truth' in the scenario where there are different anchor event addresses from the same npub), handling more than one entry for acquiring multiple IDs/names, the 'Awareness Database', then maybe an AI cleanup/refactor, then an actual dev rebuilding it with this build as the reference for proper clean code (and this is a maybe, depending on funds and/or contributor(s) coming in), and that's it, with continued testing and preping guides and approaching other nostr projects with it to integrate it until bitcoin block 1M

Video coming showing really nice progress of DNN =3

I thought I was spending a lot of money on AI to help me build DNN when I could've used free AI models. I used a bunch of those free ones. Nope, I did not waste my money. Paid AI is so much better than free AI. Paid AI was a headache to reach where I reached, free AI was 10x more of a headache x3 So ended with "Nope, I definitely didn't waste money on this" x3

In the world we're living in, always assume that, even if you're in an empty room alone, in an abandoned building, in the desert, the moment you bring something out from your brain to outside of it via written word, text, speech/voice, anything, always assume there's a non-0% chance that someone heard it.

While I want to continue this to put it on a server and test it on a modified nostr client to showcase, after 4 days working on it and staying awake til 4 to 6 am on those days, i'm exhausted x3 But happy to have reached this result and showcase an actual functional (jumbled mess of a project/codebase, i'm assuming x3) proof-of-concept of DNN

I've... been doing something... To share later, but here's my sequence reaction through this process: 1. 🤔 2. 😑 3. 🫤 4. 🤔 5. 😯 And I'm hoping my next reactions will be: 1. 😲 2. 😁 3. 🤩

The more you spend working on Nostr, the more you realize it changes everything. For example: I'm thinking "ok, so I want to add an email thing, but nostr based. I create a separate page for it with its separate... wait a minute... I'll just put it in the DMs section under a different tab."

Got my new monitor, called MSI MAG 275QR X32 I wanted to get the one without the X32, but that's what I ended up with since all the other cheap good ones got sold out. This experience has taught me, so sharing what I learned, assuming someone is planning to get a new monitor. Min spec for a good modern monitor, around budget pricing (budget pricing being $150 to $300. Got what I ended up with for $285, even though I could've gotten my initial want at $185): - 2k - 144hz and up (mine: 320, not by choice =P) - ms: 1 or below (mine is supposedly 0.5ms) - Brightness: 300 nits minimum, but aim to make it 400 nits or more (mine is 400) - HDR: VESA Certified or better (don't get one that says it's 'HDR Ready') - Ports: Display Port (if your pc or laptop doesn't have a DP, then get a converter) - Display type: IPS (Not VA) Note: Look at reviews when you're deciding, especially to see if there are a lot of reports of dead pixels

Be it god or the devil, it doesn't matter who, if a proposal is presented that fixes issues within Bitcoin, or decreases the issue at least, then it should be accepted. This is the difference between tribal thinking and topic thinking.

Seems like the current silly drama on nostr isn't done yet x3 Here's a gist of the true state of things regarding Bitcoin Lightning and eCash: 1. Lighting is either centralized or decentralized 1.1. Decentralized if I open a channel with another 1.2. Centralized if I'm under a channel point 2. eCash/CashU is either centralized or decentralized 2.1. Decentralized if you make your own eCash tokens on the channel you opened with another, that's sent to the other point in the channel, where it'd be redeemed and transferred to confirm 2.2. Centralized if you make your eCash tokens on another's channel point People developing and advancing Lighting or eCash are not developing centralized or decentralized solutions; they're developing tools that can be used for both. I can give my Bitcoin to someone, and they can keep a log of me "giving" some of it to someone else that they'd "receive", resulting in a scenario where Bitcoin became centralized (calm down, this is just an example to deliver a point =P) The resulting centralization or decentralization is based on user action. Where do we go from here? - Bitcoin is fine. - Creating LN channels sucks ass, so many just lean towards using centralized providers with low-volume money (of their own money), so hopefully people can figure out a way to make it less ass. - Considering the masses of LN users are using it in a centralized way, users of eCash would, of course, follow along that path; however, because of the nature of eCash, in many cases, it weakens the centralization of LN by spreading the funds across multiple different central LN nodes, at least initially, assuming the user doesn't group them into one single LN central node. - So eCash isn't 'the' issue in the grand scheme of things, but rather the ass-ness of creating LN channels. So until that's figured out (how to make it less ass or a different solution entirely), that's the state of LN and eCash; both being either in a state of decentralization or centralization for each user. On a different note: Regarding Primal, I don't use it much, but it isn't a centralized nostr thing. It's like any other nostr client, they just use a caching server that the user can (I think, can't recall) turn off or swap, like how it's done with DEG Mods, simply to enhance the user experience, and you can put your custom LN address, as well as hook up your NWC on it. Side note: I'm not sure if I talked about any of this before, so I might have repeated myself. Hopefully I don't forget and end up repeating myself again in the future when this silly drama happens again x3

Arc Raiders (and similar): 1. It should remain PvPVE 2. There shouldn't be a separate PVE mode 3. If there were, it would remove the magic of the game for players 4. If there were, it would divide the player base 5. If there were, it would change the dynamic of having both friendly vs hostile players, where the friendly players would just play PVE, and all the hostile players would be in the PVPVE mode Counterpoints: 1. PVPVE would remain 2. There should be a PVE-only mode 3. It wouldn't matter, because PVE players (or those who hate PVP or PVPVE) are not even playing PVPVE and don't care if they aren't getting the 'magic' 4. It wouldn't divide it because they're not in it to begin with 5. Considering the previous point, it wouldn't move anything, as there are no players to move Then the discussion/argument would end on: - "Well, it isn't a game for you then." With a response: - "You're right, so I won't buy the game because it doesn't have a mode that wouldn't affect you or the mode you like, and I'll mention this to the devs in the hopes that they'd add it since there are no negatives, only positives."