I've always thought of the "follow list" on social media, much as I do the "links page" of my website: it's the people and organizations I want to represent and feel comfortable reffering others to. But it only really works when one can do other lists of people, lists that are actually producing a timeline of sorts. In that sense, I am extremely happy about #amethyst 1.04.x: now I can read you all, but I don't have to endorse you. It's a win win: you get to be you, I get cheer for the beauty you see fit from the comfort of my detachement.

If your handheld is disturbing you with undesired noise, you can always chose to limit it. Internet disturbances are, after all, just a reflection of our own inability to oppose the colonialism of our thoughts.

Stay humble, transact with sats.

In an economy of semantics, private contact-lists are essential to an upholdable web of trust.

though money can emulate energy:time, in meat-space, energy:time is more readily available than money. Thus, depending on where you kneecap the ratio, the choice is yours: trust or surveil.

My mind blew up about 11 times today. It's one thing to power allowances. It's another to allow the powers that be.

Password management is cool, but it burns.

GM! It's 3am up in this dog and I have a long journey ahead towards this goodness:

SUMMIT | PACESETTERS

Any recommendations in Malaga? Cheapest Montana cans? Menu del dia, the folk way? Bitcoin hangouts?