Girino Vey!
1 week ago


Compartilha com aquela pessoa do “bilionários não deveriam existir”, quem sabe desenhando ela entenda.
Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1338372554981647

The irony is perfect.
Bernie Sanders has spent decades railing against millionaires and billionaires, capitalism, and corporate greed. He's written books criticizing wealth accumulation. He's campaigned on redistributing other people's money.
And he became a millionaire doing it.
Not by starting a business. Not by creating jobs. Not by building something people voluntarily pay for. By selling books and speeches about how capitalism is broken, to an audience within a capitalist system wealthy enough to buy them.
The cartoon nails it: "How to Make Millions Selling Socialism to Idiots.
The system they condemn is the only reason they can profit from condemning it. In an actual socialist economy, there's no book tour.
No merch. No personal brand. The state controls production and decides who gets what.
Capitalism allows you to get rich criticizing capitalism. Socialism doesn't even let you criticize socialism.
The grift only works in the system they claim to oppose.
Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1409718237854099
Lei Felca
Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1483794510042147
In August 2022, Adams County Sheriff's deputies arrived at Afroman's Ohio home under a warrant alleging drug trafficking and kidnapping.
They broke down his front door, ransacked the property, and took $400 in cash that officials later claimed had been "miscounted" during the search.
Authorities found no drugs, no kidnapping victims, and filed no charges.
The Fourth Amendment was written for exactly this moment.
The Founders had lived under general warrants: blanket government authority to search homes, seize property, and answer to no one.
They made that unconstitutional. A warrant must specify the place to be searched and the things to be seized, and when the state acts on bad information and causes damage, accountability belongs to the state. Not the citizen.
Afroman had security footage of the entire raid. He turned it into music.
Lemon Pound Cake" took its name from a moment captured on camera where a deputy appeared to linger over a cake on his kitchen counter. "Will You Help Me Repair My Door" was a direct accounting of the property damage left behind.
The First Amendment exists to protect precisely this kind of speech: a citizen using his own voice to document what the government did inside his own home.
Seven deputies responded by suing Afroman for defamation and invasion of privacy, seeking nearly $4 million in damages.
The ACLU called it "a classic SLAPP suit," a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation: the legal system weaponized to silence a critic of government actors.
The officers who broke down his door, searched his rooms, and took his cash claimed he had invaded their privacy.
One deputy sued over a song falsely claiming Afroman slept with his wife. When asked under oath whether that was actually false, the deputy said he wasn't sure. He may have single-handedly ended his own case on the stand.
The deputies cried during the trial listening to the songs, but the jury was unmoved.
Afroman's sole witness was actually a deputy's ex-wife.
Madison wrote the First Amendment knowing what governments do when given the power to define which speech "harms" officials.
The British had used seditious libel laws to prosecute colonists who criticized the Crown. Governors, tax collectors, and soldiers were protected from mockery by law.
The Founders put the right to criticize public officials into the First Amendment because they had lived under a government that punished exactly that.
At trial, Afroman's defense was straightforward: he is a citizen who criticized public officials for their conduct on the job. Public officials accept a higher degree of scrutiny as a condition of their authority.
His attorney compared the songs to N.W.A's "F**k tha Police" and argued that no reasonable person treats rap lyrics as sworn testimony of literal fact.
On March 18, 2026, Afroman turns up to court in a whole American flag suit. Judge Jonathan Hein reads the verdict:
In all circumstances, the jury finds in favor of the defendant. No plaintiff verdict prevailed.
Afroman walks out of the courthouse and tells reporters: "I didn't win, America won. It's still for the people, by the people.
A government that can raid your home without consequence, then sue you into silence for talking about it, is a government without limits.
The Founders knew this. They built the First and Fourth Amendments as institutional checks on exactly that instinct. What Afroman did was use those tools: he documented, published, and refused to be quieted.
The jury needed less than a day to conclude that line needed to hold.
Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1409726354519954





