Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey!
girino@girino.org
npub18lav...cfsz
Software developer and political nihilist.
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 1 week ago
image Um caso envolvendo prisão injusta no Rio de Janeiro voltou a gerar repercussão nas redes sociais após a divulgação de uma decisão judicial considerada polêmica por muitos internautas. O homem, que passou cerca de sete meses preso sem ter cometido o crime investigado, entrou na Justiça pedindo indenização contra o Estado após ser libertado. Segundo o processo, ele teria sido identificado de forma equivocada durante a investigação criminal e acabou detido preventivamente. Após meses preso, novas provas demonstraram que ele não possuía ligação com o caso, levando à sua soltura. Mesmo após a comprovação do erro, a ação de indenização movida contra o Estado do Rio de Janeiro foi rejeitada pela Justiça. O entendimento foi de que a prisão ocorreu dentro dos procedimentos considerados legais durante a investigação. Com a derrota no processo, o homem acabou condenado ao pagamento das custas processuais e honorários advocatícios, valor que ultrapassa R$ 479 mil. O episódio provocou indignação nas redes sociais e reacendeu críticas sobre falhas em reconhecimentos de suspeitos e sobre a responsabilização do Estado em casos de prisão indevida. Source: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=948706427938035&set=a.147042374771115
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 1 week ago
image This opening paragraph does what most economics papers fail to do: make you care immediately. Nathan Rothschild was richer than entire nations. And he died from an infection that costs $10 to cure today. Billionaires today have everything money can buy, and yet their wellbeing still improves when new technology is invented. The point: wealth isn't just about consuming more of the same things. It's about innovation creating new goods that didn't exist before. Source: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1453808623445060&set=a.242077657951502
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 2 weeks ago
How true was it 🪽 How true was it when Frank Herbert said, “All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts, but that it is magnetic to the corruptible.” Because power doesn’t change everyone. It reveals them. It gives someone the ability to act without consequence, and in that freedom, character becomes visible. Some use power to protect. Others use it to control. And history quietly shows that the people who chase power the hardest are rarely the ones who should hold it. 📕 By the way, I did write a poetry book called Between Heaven & Earth. It’s a collection of poems about love, heartbreak, loneliness, inner struggles, healing, and the quiet journey of understanding yourself and life along the way. If you’d like to read it, comment “Book” and I’ll send you the link. #poetry #philosophy #power #selfreflection #thefallenpoet Source:
6,185 次播放 · 1.4 万个心情 | How true was it 🪽 How true was it when Frank Herbert said, “All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts, but that it is magnetic to the corruptible.” Because power doesn’t change everyone. It reveals them. It gives someone the ability to act without consequence, and in that freedom, character becomes visible. Some use power to protect. Others use it to control. And history quietly shows that the people who chase power the hardest are rarely the ones who should hold it. 📕 By the way, I did write a poetry book called Between Heaven & Earth. It’s a collection of poems about love, heartbreak, loneliness, inner struggles, healing, and the quiet journey of understanding yourself and life along the way. If you’d like to read it, comment “Book” and I’ll send you the link. #poetry #philosophy #power #selfreflection #thefallenpoet | Zen Neor
How true was it 🪽 How true was it when Frank Herbert said, “All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathologica...
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 2 weeks ago
Ma’am with that plate I could have finished the song 🤣 #comedy #throwback if you know where this is from we are friends! Comment below Source:
1 万次播放 · 29 万个心情 | Ma’am with that plate I could have finished the song 🤣 #comedy #throwback if you know where this is from we are friends! Comment below | Lilsazonpacket
Ma’am with that plate I could have finished the song 🤣 #comedy #throwback if you know where this is from we are friends! Comment below
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 2 weeks ago
Artists Combat 2. Van Gogh vs Frida Kahlo. Steeal as Picasso, fighting as Frida 😍 #vangogh #frida #art #paint #fight Source:
7.6 万次播放 · 1 万个心情 | Artists Combat 2. Van Gogh vs Frida Kahlo. Steeal as Picasso, fighting as Frida 😍 #vangogh #frida #art #paint #fight | Yurii Yeltsov
Artists Combat 2. Van Gogh vs Frida Kahlo. Steeal as Picasso, fighting as Frida 😍 #vangogh #frida #art #paint #fight
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 2 weeks ago
image Diga que odeia pobre sem dizer que odeia pobre!
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 2 weeks ago
image Born in Vienna in 1902, Karl Popper was arguably the most important philosopher of science of the twentieth century. Trained in mathematics, physics, and psychology, by his early thirties he was already in conversation with the leading scientific minds of Europe, including Albert Einstein. He spent his life trying to answer one question with the precision of a mathematician: how do we know what we know? That question turned out to be the most politically dangerous question of the twentieth century. Vienna, 1937. By the time Popper fled Austria, he had spent years watching two regimes claim that science was on their side. Nazi Germany ran "racial biology" departments at major universities, while the Soviet Union built five-year plans on "scientific socialism." Both said the evidence proved them right, and both said anyone who disagreed was anti-science. Popper had a problem with this. He knew what real science looked like from the inside, and what he was watching was something else wearing science as a costume. He Asked a (Not So) Simple Question. What separates real knowledge from fake knowledge? Where the line falls between a scientific claim and a piece of dogma dressed up to look like one? Popper wanted a test sharp enough to work on any theory, in any field, regardless of who was defending it or how prestigious it sounded. He spent years working on it, and the answer fits in a single word: Falsifiability. A theory is scientific only if it can be proven wrong. If you cannot describe an experiment, an observation, or a piece of evidence that would make you abandon the theory, then the theory is not science. It is belief. It might be true belief, and it might even be useful belief, but it is not knowledge in the scientific sense, and treating it as such is a category error. Real science makes risky predictions. Real science can fail. Marxism Claimed to Be Scientific. It explained everything. When workers won a strike, class consciousness was rising; when they lost, it was false consciousness from capitalist propaganda. When revolutions happened, the theory had predicted it; when they failed to happen, material conditions weren't ripe yet. Popper noticed something important: there was no possible event that Marxists would accept as evidence against the theory. Every outcome confirmed it. A theory that explains every possible outcome predicts no specific outcome, and that is the signature of dogma. Racial Biology Claimed to Be Scientific Too. German universities in the 1930s produced thousands of papers measuring skulls, classifying populations, and ranking races. It looked like science because it used numbers, charts, and laboratories. But the conclusion was fixed before the measurements began. When data contradicted the hierarchy, the categories were redrawn until the data fit, and when honest researchers disagreed, they lost their jobs or their lives. Popper saw the Nazis and Soviets as two examples of something that recurs whenever power meets ideology. People who hold power want their conclusions to sound like physics. They want disagreement to look like ignorance and their critics to be cast as enemies of reason itself. Falsifiability is the test that exposes this move. If the theory cannot be wrong, the people defending it are not defending science. They are defending themselves. Trust the Science" as a Slogan. A scientist trusts a method, while a propagandist demands trust in a conclusion. The method requires you to specify what evidence would change your mind, while the conclusion requires you to stop asking. One trains people to think clearly, the other trains them to defer. When public officials, journalists, or institutions tell you the science is settled and refuse to accept evidence to the contrary, they are asking for blind obedience to authority in defiance of the scientific method itself. Popper lived through what happens when people stop asking what evidence would change your mind. He saw universities turned into propaganda offices, watched colleagues disappear, and watched entire countries agree to call obvious lies obvious truths because the lies came with credentials. His answer was a single question, and it still works. When any expert, institution, or movement claims the authority of science, ask what evidence would change their mind. A real scientist has an answer ready. A dogmatist will accuse you of being anti-science for asking. Source: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1451268000365789&set=a.242077657951502
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 2 weeks ago
Vamos tirar do calculo da inflação aquilo que o povo realmente consome, e que o preço realmente impacta na qualidade de vida do povo, e deixar só os supérfluos. Se os índices de inflação já não eram realistas, agora então não vão ser nunca mais. View quoted note →
Girino Vey!'s avatar
Girino Vey! 2 weeks ago
MANO OS CARAS SÃO FODA KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
X (formerly Twitter)
Terra Brasilis (@Terra__Brasilis) on X
EXTRA ! Acaba de sair o FUNK das Eleições Pilili, Pilili, Pilili... Alguém Votou Por Mim 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 Source:
X (formerly Twitter)
Dan 🐍🇧🇷 | TOMEI PERMA BAN, TENTANDO RECORRER (@anarcodan2) on X
MANO OS CARAS SÃO FODA KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK...
↑