GM🌞 Wild times ahead! Buckle your seatbelts, hug your loved ones, it's going to be a crazy ride!
Gzuuus
gzuuus@contextvm.org
npub1gzuu...a5ds
Forever learning, continuously buidling⚡
cryptoanarchism student
#noderunner#Bitcoin | #technology | #art | #electronics
> tl;dr Google spent over a decade telling developers that Google API keys (like those used in Maps, Firebase, etc.) are not secrets. But that's no longer true: Gemini accepts the same keys to access your private data. We scanned millions of websites and found nearly 3,000 Google API keys, originally deployed for public services like Google Maps, that now also authenticate to Gemini even though they were never intended for it. With a valid key, an attacker can access uploaded files, cached data, and charge LLM-usage to your account. Even Google themselves had old public API keys, which they thought were non-sensitive, that we could use to access Google’s internal Gemini.
View quoted note →
Google API Keys Weren
Google spent over a decade telling developers that Google API keys (like those used in Maps, Firebase, etc.) are not secrets. But that
LNVPS down? @Kieran
GM 🌞
GM🌞
I've been rewatching terminator 1 and 2 and it got me thinking. In the first film, Skynet sends a Terminator to kill Sarah Connor. A resistance soldier, Kyle Reese, time travels back to protect her, and they have a son, John Connor, the future leader of the resistance. If Skynet never sent that Terminator, John would never be born, so Skynet would never have its nemesis. I don't know what do you think but, for me that paradox feels jsut like AI slop…
Aisics, probably the future
How Taalas "prints" LLM onto a chip? - Anurag's Blog
GM
Cat in plate
This one is pretty juicy
> "Coding agents cannot be trusted to design secure applications," Tenzai concluded. "They seem to be very prone to business logic vulnerabilities. While human developers bring intuitive understanding that helps them grasp how workflows should operate, agents lack this 'common sense.'"
> Databricks' AI Red Team found that self-reflection prompts can improve security by 60-80% for Claude and up to 50% for GPT-4o. The tools can find their own vulnerabilities when asked.
> But that is precisely the problem vibe coding was supposed to solve. The entire premise is that developers - or non-developers - can describe what they want and get working software. Requiring them to also know which security prompts to add defeats the purpose.
View quoted note →
Awesome Agents
Vibe Coding Is a Security Catastrophe: 69 Vulnerabilities Found Across 5 Major AI Coding Tools
A systematic security audit of Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Replit, and Devin found 69 vulnerabilities in 15 test applications - zero CSRF protectio...