I finally finished my book! 🎉
"Bitcoin for Millennials"
It's the synthesis of 100+ podcast conversations about money, agency, and freedom, written for our generation.
I'm looking for a few people to proofread before I send it to publishers.
Want to help? Reply or DM me 👇

If your hot takes are doomer takes you already lost
Ridiculously good explainer why Bitcoin is for Millennials, by Google's NotebookLM based on my book manuscript 🤯👀
Once you see Bitcoin is a truth machine, you realize you can’t go back to the world of relative illusions.
When you realize the legacy system is a dead end, the volatility of the exit ramp becomes irrelevant.
My first podcast of the year is live! In BFM219, I reflect on what 2025 taught me and why the “Case for Bitcoin” has never been stronger than NOW⚡️
The power of Bitcoin IS that it is an immutable ledger with all history TRANSPARENT.
That is a feature not a bug.
It is immutable and thus honest.
This permanently fixes one side, on the most important human-to-human exchange in the world,
The one of value,
Positive.
That is the source of ALL INCENTIVES.
Something is Good-Bad, Light-Dark, Black-White. Polarity.
When one side is permantently positive, you make love by starting from love, because you start from love (positive).
It’s just simple game theory.
It’s how positive can attract positive.
And move beyond this physical world, where positive and negative poles work together to keep our physical reality in its shape.
Break the illusion and escape from the cave.
A true tool for enlightenment.
BFM218 with astrophysicist Stephen Perrenod is live!⚡️
“Looking at the math, I’m dismissing the idea of a four-year cycle” 👀
We discuss:
🔸Why 4-year cycles are myths
🔸The logic of logarithmic time
🔸Bitcoin’s faster growth vs gold
🔸Bitcoin’s next major bubble
🔸How power laws govern price
Most people don’t reject Bitcoin because it’s too risky.
They reject it because it forces them to reexamine everything.
And that hurts.
BFM217 w/
@Rajat Soni, CFA goes live 12PM EST ⚡️
“Our system is designed to make you poor. Your only choice is to opt-out.”⚠️
Rajat explains the brutal math behind the debt treadmill, and why the 40-hour work week isn't enough in a world of accelerating fiat money debasement👇
We are so early I LOVE IT

"Bitcoin has peaked and Gold is coming back as a world reserve asset."
=
"The computer is going nowhere and everyone will use the abacus forever."
Fiat money sells comfort.
Bitcoin demands clarity.
You don’t “understand” Bitcoin.
You wake up to it.
Bitcoin is a mirror.
Most don’t like what they see.
I want to make a podcast about the quantum computing “threat”(?) to Bitcoin.
I am reading things left and right but would love to learn more and share with others.
Which 2 people should I talk to?
Help me out 👇
The "Big Picture" Reality?
”Everything we were taught about money is wrong.” ❌
Eric V. Stacks joins me to explore the big picture of Bitcoin and why getting right with yourself is the first step to true sovereignty.
LIVE at 12PM EST⚡️
Bitcoin isn't crashing, it's reloading.
I never get the “Bitcoin trades like a Nasdaq stock" argument against Bitcoin.
It's because no one understands it yet, that is a signal, an opportunity imo.
Anyway. WE ARE EARLY⚡️
Not sure what happened but I wrote philosophical physics paper with ChatGPT🤯⚡️🧲👇
One-Page Summary:
Title: Duality as a Structural Principle of Reality: Bridging Physics and Spirituality Through Infinite Spectra
In this exploration, we propose that the physical and the spiritual are not opposing domains but complementary lenses through which we view the same underlying reality. At the heart of this reality is the principle of duality—positive and negative, light and dark, good and bad—not as rigid binaries but as the endpoints of infinite spectra.
We use the metaphor of infinite zooming—like exploring a fractal—to illustrate that our 3D reality is just one layer of an endless continuum. Polarity, in this sense, is the structural tension that allows stable forms of experience to emerge. Just as a magnet requires both poles to exist, our reality requires duality to be experienced.
Ultimately, this perspective suggests that both science and spirituality lead to the same insight: we are infinite consciousness experiencing ourselves through the dance of opposites. Enlightenment, in this context, is the neutralization of those dualities, a release from the structural conditions that make this reality possible.
In sum, by recognizing duality as a fundamental principle, we find a unified view where the physical and the spiritual are simply different ways of understanding the same infinite, self-aware universe.
Will publish full paper tomorrow.