uncleJim21's avatar
uncleJim21
uncleJim21@nostrly.com
npub1g564...9lcr
AI + Freedom Founder of CASCDR
uncleJim21's avatar
uncleJim21 9 hours ago
Trash World keeps on trashin' ๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿคก
uncleJim21's avatar
uncleJim21 3 days ago
uncleJim21's avatar
uncleJim21 3 days ago
Somewhere a yuppie in a Patagonia vest is pitching YOUR Fourth Amendment rights to investors so he can raise a Series E. The product is Flock Safety. The pitch is public safety. The reality is the largest warrantless surveillance dragnet in American history, built one HOA at a time. It's the worst trade this country has ever made. The pitch leans on unsolved crimes and missing children. The reality is a nationwide license plate dragnet, queryable by thousands of agencies, governed by contracts instead of laws. The retention period is whatever they say it is, because there is no independent audit that could prove otherwise. You are trusting a private company's word about what it has erased from its own servers. This is not a serious public safety argument. It is a sales funnel dressed up as civics. Our rights are one of the few real assets this country has left, and people died for them. They are not on the table for debasement by a Series E startup chasing an exit. Their best lawyers will tell you none of this violates the Constitution. Tell that to the men who wrote it. Try explaining Flock Safety to a founding father. Pick one. Adams, Madison, Jefferson, doesn't matter. Tell him a private company has placed an enchanted eye at every crossroads in America, each one seeing with the power of a million men, none of them sleeping. Every face that passes is recorded into a permanent ledger, sold to thousands of agencies who may read any page without ever facing a magistrate. Tell him it amounts to a general warrant against every citizen, made permanent and sold for profit. How long does that last in his hands? He burns the ledger, smashes the eyes, and publicly executes everyone who supported it. Here's what should embarrass them. It doesn't address the actual problem. The criminology is not contested. One landmark study found 1% of the population accounted for 63% of violent crime convictions. In Oakland, one report found 0.1% of the population drove the majority of homicides. Crime is concentrated in a tiny, identifiable population of repeat offenders. We don't have a "we can't find them" problem. We have a "we won't hold them" problem. DAs decline to charge. Judges grant low or no bail. Cases sit in backlogs years deep. Police departments are understaffed and demoralized. A Flock camera will not fix any of that. It cannot make a DA prosecute. It cannot make a judge sentence. It cannot turn a 14 time repeat offender into someone who stays in custody. What it can do is photograph every law abiding commuter on the way to work and store the data in a private database. That is not public safety. That is anarcho tyranny. The lawless walk. The lawful are watched. The right response to this isn't a thoughtful op ed. It's contempt. Loud, sustained, public contempt. Solve crime by enforcing the laws we already have, against the people we already know are committing them. Don't sell our birth right to a man with a pitch deck. image #privacy #ethics
uncleJim21's avatar
uncleJim21 3 days ago
Which nostr app has the best DM reliability rate? Tbh good subject matter for a case study #asknostr
โ†‘