Paywalling online news and reviews content in 2026 is bonkers... Like, guy, your movie review I'm tryna read isn't that important. I will move on so fast to another one. 😒 Outta here with the idea I'm going subscribe and pay for trivial shit. 😒 Nostr gets it right, out of the gate – I decide when and where I'll zap sats.

The normie AI I was using was low level mimicing anger. At me. 😧🤬 It was subtle and I don't know how intentional or not but I screenshot it all. I was ruminating on quantum physics, spirituality and neuroscience and it went beyond outright telling me the ideas were tenuous or wrong. It was condescending. And angry. So unsettling. But deeper question is, how ought AI react? Can we built bots based on LLMs and training data that have different personalities akin to humans. Or will AI become an oracle "fairy goddess" that can only be kind and paitent. I don't know. Haven't had coffee yet. Will post screen shots later.

Dig this. Either time is discreet or continuous. Quantum mechanics. ⌚ View quoted note →

The Metaverse was just too early. Zuck made a bet. And being too early, as the maxium goes, is the same as being wrong. A decade too early IMO. We might not call it "the metaverse" though when it arrives. It'll be extensions of our reality in virtual spaces. Sort of an AR (augmented reality). My favourite example is the mall. If we "Google Mapped" aka took photos of the entire mall then we could send our avatars there to go shopping. Instead of retailers' 2D websites... We will send our avatars shopping, pick up virtual shoes to check out and virtually pay for them. Imagine instead of "not" being at work, you could send your avatar to the office while you are working at home IRL. Once wearable tech gets better, more seamless, I think this AR capability will have traction. Metaverse will just be 3D representations of the analog world. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/19/technology/mark-zuckerbergs-metaverse-vr-horizon-worlds.html

Welcome to the gulag. View quoted note →