The article is right to highlight risks from the growing use of custodial services, regulated endpoints, and infrastructure centralization, but it understates the persistent, robust ability for individuals to opt out and use #Bitcoin fully decentralized, censorship-resistant, and open-source as designed. The permissionless nature is not “allowed” — it persists as the network’s baseline, regardless of ongoing attempts to regulate, steer, or shape its use.

Is Bitcoin decentralized & secure or is it allowed to look that way

Bitcoin is permissionless in code but permissioned in practice by choke-points that governments and large intermediaries either directly control or...

Tonight, the Fifth of November, code crackles and the Alps smolder — somewhere between V’s mask and Guy Fawkes’ gunpowder, old empires tremble. Bonfires roar; rebellion smirks. In the shadows, someone whispers: "Salve ad Resistendum".

Seems like #privacy coins are catching a bid. Who could this be!? Dirty WS crooks on brick of turning privacy into a trend?

#Bitcoin whitepaper day: Satoshi flung open Pandora’s box, gifting us freedom tech and a new breed of digital rebellion. Today, we fire up nodes, run our servers, and spit in the eye of centralized control. Long live peer-to-peer chaos — decentralization is not a trend, it’s a revolution.

When it comes to online comms, networking and data transferring, the serverless path that these guys are pioneering seems the most promising. The mission is to provide with all the building blocks one needs to make unstoppable #P2P apps. #Keet is a beta app built to showcase what can be with these tools.

Pear Docs

Satoshi said Bitcoin might buy us “a few years’ head start.” Sixteen years later, it’s doing far more — tearing down old rails, rewriting what it means to build, to own, to connect. The code keeps mutating, bending new systems into its orbit, pulling creation itself away from the choke points. Bit by bit, block by block — freedom is compounding, and the center is losing its grip.

The argument that Bitcoin was designed or “shepherded” by U.S. intelligence as a containment or telemetry system collapses under open‑source verifiability, historical context, and economic logic. The thesis is wrong because it mistakes emergent geopolitics and regulatory co‑option for original engineering intent, relies on conjecture unsupported by cryptographic or archival evidence, and ignores Bitcoin’s transparent, adversarially tested codebase that contradicts any secret‑author narrative. https://controlplanecapital.com/p/did-the-cia-create-bitcoin-and-whether

I woke up sweating fiat fumes. Last night, Jerome Powell himself drifted into my dream like a ghost from the Eccles Building — same silver hair, same tight smile trying to hide a cosmic panic. The room crackled with tension, a small, uneasy gathering of economic mandarins and paper billionaires. No one was happy with him. I felt a strange pity, maybe even humanity. So I said something kind, just a small mercy amid the muttering suits. His eyes lit up — poor man looked like someone had handed him a lifeline through the eye of a liquidity storm. Then, in a moment of whispered sin, he leaned close and said, “We’ve decided to print another ten trillion.” Just like that. Calm. Casual. Like announcing fresh blood for the vampire. I smiled. My subconscious screamed hallelujah. Somewhere, my cold wallet started humming. #Bitcoin, baby — the signal piercing through the madness, the fireproof lifeboat in an ocean of inflated lies. You know what to do, plebs.

GM ✴

The “Dox-to-Earn” Model