I get this response all the time: try to do this with a bank. The irony in this is that the epitome of money for these people is bank acceptance. Let that sink in. Casually committing a category error (with a side of false analogy): pretending #Bitcoin is a bank counter you can harass with glued-on junk. It’s a permissionless protocol — if it’s consensus-valid, it’s a transaction. Your “purity test” is just cosplay regulation. View quoted note →

Calling yourself a bitcoiner while trying to choke demand for block space is a contradiction. Bitcoin lives on activity, on people fighting for space and fees that keep the chain secure. There’s no room for gatekeepers declaring which transactions are “real.” As the subsidy fades, a quiet chain is a weak chain. #Bitcoin needs movement, not purity tests.

It was blatantly clear there was an agenda behind this man's relentless spamming. View quoted note →

It is evident that any endeavor to artificially diminish the demand for block space constitutes a form of economic self-harm.

Cause he's a fuckin bitch. Just look at him. View quoted note →

The strangest part of #Bitcoin culture is watching people swear they’re defending the protocol by refusing to actually use it. They chant “never sell” as if hoarding were some sacred duty, but then act surprised when the fee market dries up and the economic engine underneath the whole thing starts coughing like an old generator running on fumes and demanding jpeg syrup. They imagine they’re preserving purity, but what they’re really doing is starving the very incentive structure meant to keep the system adversarial, resilient, and honest. It’s like celebrating how pristine a highway looks when nobody drives on it — right up until you notice the maintenance crews have all quit, the asphalt is cracking, and the whole thing is one good winter away from collapsing into gravel.

We are collectively just a bunch cowards cause we fall for narratives. Us bitcoiners and freedom tech maxis — being probably the only group of people that understand how incentives work — falling into the same trap of ststists' deliberate backward twist of them is making us look worse than normies from buttcoin.

Kratter is a bitch and y'all being hoodwinked; fuck your priesthood, fuck your mechanic and the horses y'all came riding on.

I fuckin hate this kratter twat; he single-handedly made sure the shit that was thrown at the fan ended up splashing all over the walls by his constant spamming. If we need spam control, it's against fucks like him. View quoted note →

I can understand @ODELL show of anger here. It's annoying af what these people are doing — dirty tactics. View quoted note →

If you believe Bitcoin ceases to function as money without BIP110, or that it cannot handle spam with its current mechanisms, you are misunderstanding how Bitcoin works. View quoted note →

That level of honesty hits too close to home. Safer to rage at “illegals” than confront how this country was built by people who weren’t invited either. View quoted note →

I like the way this guy put it. View quoted note →

Can price be controlled? Bulk orders can shove the ticker, sure. A whale slams the book and the candles flinch. But this is a shark-eats-shark ocean — no benevolent market maker, no referee, just predators circling liquidity. Every splash gets answered. Slam size into the bid, and arbitrage desks smell blood. Try to spoof the surface, and someone deeper takes the other side. One move detonates a chain of reactions you never fully map — bots fire, spreads widen, momentum traders pile on, contrarians fade it. Influence exists, control does not. The sea corrects. View quoted note →

We have had no instance of getting beyond compute efficient frontier. I guess we will be stuck in 4 for a long while. View quoted note →