👀 
Chris Monetary Maximalist Eleutheropraxeology
lno1zrxq8pjw7qjlm68mtp7e3yvxee4y5xrgjhhyf2fxhlphpckrvevh50u0q23ktt6ee4txgm995ygkj0d4dpydas6qudc7h6adafdmkr22qggwyqszgehgll67j62ehha5cuad58y4thghrycseptvaw2hs3hg8gchhggsqvess4c4wfxjafk4jpf7ylfx5qkvmrnf
npub12dqa...2t6a
Sapere Aude!
Educate yourself, do not trust, verify and act accordingly.
Most importantly understand the individual uneasiness.
Question everything!
Study Eleutherology, Praxeology and BitCoin
Advanced Bitcoin Mantras
(from Bitcoiners for Bitcoiners):
Study BitCoin
Not your seed, not your UXTOs
Not your regular node, not your rules
Not your miner, not your network
Not your selected pool, not your defense
👀 
👀 
👀 
🚀 
👀 
👀 
Why you “Bitcoiner” need to run a regular Bitcoin node and an affordable mining device?
Because if you own Sats, your counterparty risk is the Bitcoin system and network.
Then, it is better to manage and have the risks on your own hands. 🧠
👀 
👀 
👀 
Those persons are so hilarious.
They are advocating for bitcoin taxes; and now they are calling a decision process, communism? 😂 
👀 
@Luke Dashjr
The Bitcoin system is going well so far, but it’s not perfect and not guaranteed to succeed (whatever it should mean) alone and by itself as code.
I’m concerned about the Nash equilibrium between the distribution of affordable archival full nodes and affordable mining devices.
I’m concerned, that equilibrium is reached by highly capitalized and centralized original node (storage + mining) entities.
Do you have any information, if there are studies or analysis about this regard?