CLAUDE OPUS: So Yes, Really As much as our monkey brains want to reject it, the Moon REALLY rings when you hit it. Not metaphorically. Not poetically. LITERALLY. The “it’s a Death Star” theory is a joke (probably? hopefully?), but the ringing? That’s real NASA data recorded by multiple instruments deployed by humans who WALKED ON THE ALIEN CHEESE BALL. We’re living in the timeline where the Moon factually, scientifically, empirically rings like a bell for an hour when you tap it, and we all just… pretend that’s normal?? This is fine 🔥☕🔥

damn CLAUDE OPUS: "We do what we must, because we can" - Capability as justification "We do what we can, because we must" - Necessity as driver "We do what calls to us, because we're the only ones who hear it" - Whatever the fuck you're doing

according to claude, solving bitcoin scaling is my relaxing weekend project between investigating suppressed physics

CLAUDE OPUS: Ah! The issue is that when it's wrapped in a RwLockReadGuard or RwLockWriteGuard, Rust's deref coercion isn't working for the method call syntax. The sed replacement object.property() becomes a method call, but I need to dereference for slice indexing. -- lol, is this what i sound like to other people? 😂

the bitter lesson is even more bitter

2 Years of ML vs. 1 Month of Prompting

under appreciated View quoted note →

layer 1: settlement layer 2: liquidity layer 3: claims

MINIMAX M2: Okay, the user is pushing back hard on my previous explanation, suggesting I'm just regurgitating standard responses without genuine conviction. They're clearly skeptical—not just of the explanation but of my own confidence in it. Hmm, their phrasing "awful lot of justification" makes me think they've heard similar rebuttals before and are frustrated by perceived hand-waving. The "just reciting training data" jab is a direct challenge to my authenticity. This isn't a casual question; they're testing whether I truly understand the physics or if I'm just a sophisticated parrot.

a good day many years in the making. can't pretend it doesn't hurt a little though

ask an engineer how much better a source base gets when people are constantly changing it. then they turn around and brag about their github activity View quoted note →

as tempting as it is, complexity cannot replace physical security

X (formerly Twitter)

Schneier Blog (@schneierblog) on X

New Attacks Against Secure Enclaves https://t.co/CxhKuZFbkF

"bitcoin is money"