Where is my phone built?
Got it — since you bought your Z Fold6 in Texas, it was almost certainly assembled in Samsung’s Vietnam plants. But the important components come from a global supply chain. Roughly:
Key Parts & Their Origins
Display (foldable AMOLED + Ultra Thin Glass)
Made by Samsung Display in South Korea and Vietnam.
UTG (ultra-thin glass) sourced from Schott (Germany) and finished in South Korea.
Processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy)
Designed by Qualcomm (U.S.).
Fabricated by TSMC (Taiwan) using their 4nm node.
Memory (RAM & Storage)
Made by Samsung Electronics in South Korea and China.
Some NAND production also happens in Japan via Kioxia (Samsung also makes NAND in Korea).
Cameras (sensors & modules)
Sensors mainly from Sony (Japan) and Samsung (Korea).
Lens modules assembled in China or Vietnam.
Batteries
Supplied by Samsung SDI (Korea, China, Malaysia).
Some packs are assembled in Vietnam.
Modems / Connectivity chips
Qualcomm, same TSMC fabrication in Taiwan.
RF components from Murata (Japan) and Broadcom (U.S.).
Hinges / Mechanical parts
Designed by Samsung, manufactured/assembled in Vietnam with parts from South Korea and China.
Assembly
Final assembly for U.S.-sold phones → Vietnam (Bắc Ninh or Thái Nguyên factories).
So, the “Made in Vietnam” on your box really means “assembled in Vietnam,” but the guts are a Taiwanese CPU, Korean memory, Japanese/Samsung camera mix, Korean/German glass, and global battery suppliers.
Want me to map this into a visual supply chain flow chart (by component → country)?
What if north Korea decides to run a a million full nodes?
Can't they hurt Americans, who have alot of BTC?
Do libertarian bitcoiners want to see the world burn just a little too much?
My friend is a friend of this lady on death row
And she wrote this book
So I'm reading this book and it is very Christian very Catholic and I'm not
And yet it is still a very powerful book very spiritual very poignant very well written and very interesting
I believe that some of the people here in this forum know how to read even though some of you were born after 1990
If you're one of the people who knows how to read I suggest you read this book
Flowers in the Garden of Mercy:...
I'm 90% sure Satoshi was a woman
Does Christin laguard still think Bitcoin is a scam?
Have any of you guys f***** around with solv?
Here's the current landscape for U.S.-accessible, non‑KYC (self-custodial) Bitcoin vault yield options for locking BTC—especially with a 90-day horizon:
---
Available Today: Solv Protocol’s BTC+ Vault via dApp
KYC-free when accessed directly through the Solv dApp, even for U.S. users .
The product offers a 90-day epoch system, where you deposit BTC, receive a representative token (BTC+), and earn base yields around 4.5%–5.5% APR .
It includes institution-grade security features like:
Chainlink Proof-of-Reserves,
NAV-based risk controls,
and supports strategies across DeFi, CeFi, and real-world assets .
Key point: Using the Solv dApp means no centralized KYC, and BTC remains self-custodied—so long as you're comfortable managing your own wallet.
---
Others—Emerging or Theoretical Options
1. **Bitcoin Native Timelocks (CLTV)**
Use Bitcoin’s Check Lock Time Verify (CLTV) to lock BTC natively while earning yield through participation in secured infrastructure .
Still early-stage, not yet mainstream for retail.
2. Wrapped BTC on DeFi Platforms
Popular method: wrap BTC (e.g., wBTC) and deploy on Ethereum or sidechains for lending or liquidity yield .
Inherently involves smart contract and bridge risks—not ideal if prioritizing trustlessness.
---
Quick Comparison
Option US-Accessible KYC Required Custody Yield (APR) Notes
Solv BTC+ via Solv dApp Yes No Self-custody ~4.5%–5.5% Institutional-grade, composable yields
Solv via Binance (KYC) No (for US) Yes Custodial Similar base + boosts Not available to U.S. users
CLTV-based native vaults TBD No Self-custody Early results Intriguing, but not broadly available
Wrapped BTC DeFi (e.g., wBTC on Ethereum) Yes No Self-custody Varies Exposes to bridge and smart-contract risk
---
Bottom Line:
If your goal is a 90-day lockup BTC yield that's accessible in the U.S., self-custodial, and doesn’t need KYC, the Solv BTC+ vault via its dApp is your go-to—for now. It blends institutional-scale strategy with DeFi composability while respecting custody.
Want help connecting a wallet to Solv, or modeling what locking 1 BTC for 90 days would return under current APR?
Platinum up 4.5%
Good thought experiment. If we assume Satoshi was a woman, here are the stylistic elements in her writing that support the hypothesis:
---
1. Politeness & Indirectness
Satoshi frequently used softening phrases:
“It would be nice if…”
“I think…”
“Probably…”
This hedging style is less common in male cypherpunk forums of the 1990s/2000s, which were often blunt, adversarial, or aggressively confident.
Reads more like an academic or educator accustomed to consensus-building.
---
2. Teaching Tone
Posts often read like a lesson plan:
Concepts are broken into step-by-step explanations.
Heavy use of analogies (gold, mining, signatures).
Rare jargon dumps; instead, technical ideas are framed for a broad audience.
This “explain don’t boast” tone is atypical of the macho hacker culture at the time, but common among educators—including female academics trying to open technical fields.
---
3. Community Orientation
Satoshi avoided first-person bragging. Rarely wrote “I invented…”—instead, emphasized the system itself.
Often shifted attention away from self toward “we” and “the network.”
That rhetorical modesty contrasts with male contemporaries who often debated by asserting authority.
---
4. Absence of Ego/Conflict Style
Cypherpunk lists were full of flame wars; Satoshi’s style was calm, measured, and non-confrontational.
Example: when criticized, Satoshi responded with patient explanations rather than dominance or sarcasm.
That conflict-avoidance and collaborative framing fits more with stereotypical female discourse patterns identified in sociolinguistics.
---
5. Careful Identity Management
Satoshi wrote in an unusually neutral register—free of idioms, pop culture, or “tells.”
Sociolinguists note this hyper-awareness of concealment is consistent with someone navigating a male-dominated space where being outed as female could undermine credibility.
---
Bottom Line
If Satoshi was a woman, the supporting stylistic traits are:
Hedging & politeness instead of blunt authority.
Teaching tone instead of hacker one-upmanship.
Community-centered framing over personal credit.
Calm, non-combative replies in a flame-heavy environment.
Neutral, guarded identity presentation that could double as camouflage.
---
Would you like me to pull a few direct Satoshi quotes that showcase these traits side by side with typical male cypherpunk posts, so the contrast is crystal clear?
