waxwing's avatar
waxwing
npub1vadc...nuu7
Bitcoin, cryptography, Joinmarket etc.
waxwing's avatar
waxwing 5 months ago
Some notes, coming from my recent experience as a guy in his 50s learning Spanish. I'm trying to generalize what I've learnt about learning; I'm curious to know others' experiences. Phase 0. The baby: Copying sounds, like a baby does. This *can* be accompanied by reading the alphabetic representation of those sounds, although that is the easy part; the hard part is learning how the sounds work. Notice this should be at least majority target language (i.e. you can have translations of standard phrases for meaning, but your *work* here is to copy the sounds). Phase 1. The struggle: practicing rules, playing games, and achieving understanding with limited knowledge. This phase is often accompanied with significant usage of mother tongue (i.e. not the target language), which is to be minimized if possible. Phase 2. The snowball: can now enjoy consuming what interests you (e.g. films, podcasts, TV). Continued osmosis of more patterns. At this point you should be operating 90%+ in the target language (translations are only a last resort, you still use them but you avoid them). Phase 3. The totality: the language becomes part of (or more usually, all of) your everyday life experience. This is the normal path to fluency. It's interesting to observe (IMO) that your entire language learning process can actually be via only *ONE* of these phases, and it *can* lead to fluency, as crazy as it seems. There are stories of adults learning an entire language through only phase 0 (an American who lived in Thailand (when there were few foreigners; perhaps 1950) for several years without speaking a single word, but eventually spoke fluently with a perfect accent because of it). This seems to be extremely uncommon, except for the mother tongue acquisition of course. There are also adults who prefer to go straight to Phase 3, often speaking terribly badly at first, and definitely picking up ossified errors in pronunciation and grammar, but for a certain type of person this works really well, *if* they have the kind of personality and lifestyle that allows them to integrate into a society while learning (or sometimes, they have to just force it; they need to work in a foreign country). There are those who use Phase 2 for a very long time, for this type of person the language is more of a hobby, albeit a high level one: they simply consume but over time do so at a near-fluency level (good example, many people outside of Anglo countries watch US TV and movies their entire life, or something specialist like anime, and develop full listening fluency, though it may be somewhat specialized). Such a person will usually be competent at using the language more generally, and can eventually be properly fluent. Phase 1 is probably the least likely (even less than Phase 0! , though I guess that's debatable) to result in full fluency. This can be seen as the "academic" approach: study the language, and practice it within defined sets of exercises. The biggest problem with this (and in a different way, Phase 0) is that it's hard to keep motivation for the literally many years that an adult would need, to reach fluency with this approach. As you've probably gleaned, in this framing, the reason adults usually end up reaching fluency or at least competence via Phase 2 or 3 is because it's only there that you have easy and full *motivation* to keep working on it. That's why the crossover from Phase 1 to Phase 2 is so crucial; I think a lot of failed language learning fails because of not choosing to cross that threshold, at which you can start to simply enjoy consuming, early enough. This is why I have become a big advocate of the acquire-through-consuming method, over the traditional "learning" methods which seem to be very ineffective. The best way to get over the hump of Phase 1, in my experience, is to spend *little or no time on grammar exercises or any rote learning*, and perhaps 90% of your time on finding ways to consume content in the language, even if your level of understanding is as little as 50% or less. Best place to start is TV shows with target language subtitles, since it has so many cues to understanding, and honestly, keep this as the bedrock of your learning process all the way to the "end of Phase 2", if that makes any sense. Which for an adult who's older, could be years, not months. Also this is why I would *never* recommend e.g. Duolingo. This is for my money just a terrible approach, it's turbo-charged Phase 1 to simply play a game of learning words over and over. Probably a controversial opinion. And by the way (I always make this recommendation but not sure if anyone ever really took me up on it), I *strongly* recommend Rosetta Stone audio files for Phase 0. It worked perfectly for me with Spanish.
waxwing's avatar
waxwing 5 months ago
Are notes always scanned at supermarkets in your part of the world? Germany I think? But also, are they just scanned for fakeness or are you saying serial numbers are checked or something?
waxwing's avatar
waxwing 6 months ago
13 years later the dream is still alive. My very first foray into all this "bitcoin stuff" was getting deeply involved in the conversations about how to do p2p fiat-btc exchanges while minimising trust. That culminated in tlsnotary, which is one of the techs they're using here. I have no idea how successful these schemes will be, they are inevitability very messy, but for sure the state of the art has moved forward a long way.
waxwing's avatar
waxwing 6 months ago
Incontrovertible cryptographic proof has now been established that human conversation is meaningless. In the language of Goldwasser, Micali, Rackoff 1985 we have the "zero knowledge property": if the transcript of a conversation can be simulated without the other party even being there, then no information is conveyed by it. Since the Turing test as originally conceived has now been unquestionably passed, easily, then simulation of human conversation transcripts are regularly produced in subexponential time (with the right computer), proving that the information content of human conversation is zero. Of course, stated in a kind of stupid way for comic effect (but also there is an intriguing analogy, too). The closer-to-accurate deduction of course, is that humanness is no longer interesting *in the context of verbal conversation*, if indeed over time, these LLMs can fool us, or be clearly better than us, in every possible context, at doing it. One part that fascinates me is how the bar keeps getting set higher for consciousness; in the 80s or maybe 90s, if you started positing computers that could *easily* pass the Turing test, people would at least seriously consider the question of consciousness. Somehow we have managed to push that far out of mind, except the occasional "blip" in the news when some scientist or engineer is concerned about AIs "going rogue" or "having rights". But almost no one talks about AGI in terms of consciousness, only as a long term danger.
waxwing's avatar
waxwing 6 months ago
Anonymity is what shifts the Overton window. When Satoshi Nakamoto chose full anonymity (at considerable personal cost, presumably), it was in the context of projects like egold, Liberty Reserve which in that time period were being prosecuted for doing similar things. *After* Nakamoto, the Overton window had shifted, since no one could prosecute him, and now people start their own currencies all the time and there isn't any discussion of prosecution or prison. Today, Roman Storm and the Samourai Devs are facing prison time for writing privacy software [1]. If someone writes something similarly successful/high profile, *properly and fully anonymously*, the Overton window may shift again. [1] in both cases, there was monetary compensation for them embedded into the software's action. This complicated the argument considerably, but even if you think that's a central point, note that Nakamoto was "compensated" too, with mining; it's not, as commonly believed, a known fact that none of the mined funds were spent.
waxwing's avatar
waxwing 6 months ago
I just tried chatgpt(5) on a tough cryptography coding challenge with a very limited prompt [1] and its response was basically perfect. We're screwed. [1] In case you're curious it was: "Implement the inner product argument as described in Bulletproofs 2017 (authored by Benedikt Bunz et al), in Python".
waxwing's avatar
waxwing 6 months ago
Have you seen the ad Coinbase made for the UK? I've just seen it and it's quite remarkable. Also apparently it was banned on UK TV networks?! That is somehow even more interesting.
waxwing's avatar
waxwing 6 months ago
I wonder if the Pareto principle applies in 80% of contexts.