Main Thesis? Debasement Zimbabwe printed its way into oblivion. They went from billion to trillion-dollar notes, and people ended up trading bread with gold flakes. Money stopped being a measure of value and became a tool of survival. That’s what happens when politicians control issuance. The temptation to print is infinite. The result is always the same = the currency dies. Now look at the U.S. A proposal for a $250 bill and talk of putting Trump’s face on it. Sounds symbolic, but it’s not. It’s a sign of the same disease The system is stretched, the debt unpayable, and the only way out is dilution. Every historical precedent ends here: devalue the money, inflate the supply, call it “stimulus.” Bitcoin fixes this because it can’t be printed. It’s not controlled by any committee, any president, or any regime. Its supply is capped. Its rules are transparent. And its enforcement is mathematical, not political. In a world where every government is forced to debase to survive, the only rational hedge is a system that doesn’t bend. That’s Bitcoin. A defense mechanism against the inevitable

Who is still active here?

Imagine the rotation from gold to Bitcoin. Explain it to me like I’m 10 years old.

The people calling the top at 126k are the ones who will get wrecked by not buying the dip or by selling into local, hfsp Buying these dips in a bull market is how you accumulate the most ₿.

when price discovery?

We have at least 40% more to go… That puts us at 164k at a minimum. These next couple of months are going to get pretty interesting 🤞

The Fed showed up late to its own party, stumbled around with no clear policy, and now wants credit. At this point, the only policy that makes sense is the simplest one, End the Fed.

The world changed completely in the last 3 years. that is why everyones feel something eerie but doesn't know how to pinpoint it Before 2022 you still had forever careers, real attention and manufactured trust. but still "trust", AI unlocked infinite labor, infinite entertainment, infinite propaganda, infinite identity crises. Everything real can now be faked. That’s why Bitcoin matters it’s the only anchor that can’t be simulated.

I am ready for 400K and also for 80K. Do what you must, Bitcoin… I would enjoy both very very much

Nostr/primal has changed a lot can someone help me and give me a 101 basics on whos active here? how to find good signal? x is getting way to botted

People wait their whole lives for this exact moment in Q4. And when it finally arrives… they doubt. This cycle is about to go absolutely insane. You are here. And you still hesitate. That hesitation is the reason ₿ has so much asymmetry. Humans lack conviction, courage, and discipline to see what is happening in front of them. This is the chance of a lifetime.

Between tenant turnover, costly repairs, evictions, rising property taxes, and skyrocketing insurance premiums… Real estate is pure liability. The global real estate market is $330T. Tens of trillions of that is pure monetary premium. People don’t buy houses for utility, they buy them to not hold fiat. Same with bonds ($140T) and equities ($120T). That’s trillions of monetary energy trapped in fragile pipes. Negative real yield, constant debasement, endless risk. Bitcoin is the apex asset. No tenants. No taxes. No premiums. Global real estate 330T 10 percent flow 1.4M per ₿ 20 percent flow 2.8M per ₿ 50 percent flow 7M per ₿ 100 percent flow 15M per ₿ The capital markets are bleeding. The monetary premium is migrating. And all of it ends up in the same place. ₿ is inevitable.

At the base of everything We all want ₿ to succeed, don’t we? It doesn’t matter if you are Core, Knots, Black, White, Asian, Jewish, Catholic, or even a lost soul drifting through altcoins. What truly unites us is the undeniable truth that ₿ must work and that ₿ must move forward as the foundation of the monetary world. And if you stand against that, you place yourself as an enemy, and the antibodies of this movement will take care of you.

In the past one stable job could buy you a house, a car, and a path to retirement. Now, one stable job barely covers rent, endless bills, student debt, healthcare premiums, rising food prices, interest on credit cards, the cost of raising a family, taxes that never stop growing, inflation that eats every paycheck, and the constant need for side hustles just to stay afloat yet somehow you’re still falling behind. Bitcoin turns that impossible game into a winnable one by giving you money that can’t be debased.

Bitcoin is a bearer asset and settlement network whose rules are enforced by physics (hash power + math), as you may know (hopefully) --> giving every saver a credible outside option. Once an outside option exists, demand for fiat and sovereign debt becomes more elastic, a lot more elastic the inflation tax’s steepens, capital can exit, gray markets price around controls, and the marginal cost of repression rises. No government has to “choose” to surrender anything incentives grind them down retain savings by offering real yield (in BTC terms obviously), lower taxes, or accept higher funding costs and dwindling seigniorage. As balance sheets mark to a non-inflatable unit and BTC becomes collateral, the ability to socialize losses via debasement erodes. Bitcoin doesn’t abolish authority, CLEARLY, it makes bad monetary policy expensive and easy to route around.

We’re entering an epoch where every pillar of reality tilts at once. AI is liquefying labor. China is gearing up for war. Bitcoin is redistributing money. Biotech is teasing human rejuvenation. The matrix of entertainment, propaganda & identity is exploding into infinite simulations. Survival = anchoring to the few constants that can’t be simulated.

Bitcoin’s strength is that both Core and Knots can exist side by side without breaking consensus. right? Core’s view? if miners include a type of transaction, blocking it at the node level just pushes users to private relay channels, which hurts decentralization. Knots’ view? letting too much arbitrary data through makes running a node heavier, which risks centralization. Both are trying to protect Bitcoin, just from different angles. The real risk is in people confusing policy (relay rules) with consensus (the rules that actually define Bitcoin). Maybe the best outcome is a mix = some nodes stricter, some looser, but all verifying the same chain. Diversity at the edges? unity at the central rules? Disclaimer I’m still learning here and haven’t formed a full opinion. It’s a nuanced topic, so any thoughts, critiques, or good sources to read would be really helpful. A likely psyop would be to inflate policy disagreements into “existential threats,” The goal of such a narrative wouldn’t be to change consensus, it would be to divide the community, erode trust in developers, and frighten users into thinking Bitcoin is unstable. In reality, these debates live at the policy layer, while consensus rules remain untouched. right?

If global fiat credit grows ~8% yearly, In 10 years fiat units are ~2x larger, in 20 years ~5x, in 30 years ~10x; that math alone = BTC must absorb multiples more fiat value, and with adoption layering on top, it becomes exponential for context, the math for global debt is approx. $315T (2025) → $550T (10y) → $1,000T (20y) → $2,500T (30y)

The nation that masters PoW first principles and deploys hashpower tactically will possess an asymmetric advantage in the 21st century monetary order.

Every system whether it is education / politics / media it teaches people to trade the permanent for the immediate. The brain’s circuitry is pulled toward novelty and reward, ENTIRE industries are designed to monetize that pull. Attention is fractured into endless micro-choices, each one trivial alone but catastrophic in aggregate From first principles, Bitcoin stands outside that loop, but most never step outside long enough to see it.