KYC: Kill Your Customer

Yvelines : un homme et une femme séquestrés à leur domicile, 900.000 euros de bitcoins dérobés

I read more and learned more and now believes that Giacomo Zucco’s position regarding spam debate is the rationale one.

The only person that prevents me at this stage to signal for BIP-110 is @Giacomo Zucco because I respect him so much and knows he knows much more than me.

I really would like to be opposed to bip-110. I am not running it now. But I did not find any 1st principle solid argument against it including from people i admire who are against it

I believe we should aim for minimum common denominator for bitcoin Bitcoin is money Bitcoin is permissionless for money Money is important Robustness is important Mono-purpose usage limits the surface attack Data limits is not censorship - censorship is very different. It is preventing people to say what they want or to transact with who they want / how they want. Limiting sizes of arb data on monetary network is not censorship. A lot of devs that brought a lot to bitcoin don’t care about money. That’s fine. Work on other things. It is silly to give your effort and life for something you don’t care about. Bitcoin is a monetary network and protocol. Doing multiple things makes it more fragile for that important purpose. @Giacomo Zucco clearly you are mot knowledgeable about bitcoin than me and you care about it as money and don’t favor spam. But i don’t understand your opposite too. To BIP-110 and i would like to. Consensus rules have changed historically. Reintroduction of op_return in 2014 was such a change. Why would (notably) limit Op_returns size at consensus level be an unacceptable change if it gathers consensus? Conservative position makes no sense if changes that harms the things we care most about have occurred. Only reactionary position makes sense then. I agree with @Luke Dashjr view that contiguous data being labeled arb data by the protocol is different morally and legally as non-contiguous being supposed to be something else. I disagree with a lot of Luke’s worldsview though but that I agree with. Minimum common denominator. Then I really don’t want this thing to be broken. But I am not under the impression than BIP-110 is reckless : it takes a lot of precaution not to be. Core change of default relay policy 100kb for op_returns with little consensus was more reckless imo.

I have no idea anymore about this core vs knots drama. I think bitcoin should be optimized for monetary use not for data storage. Changing default relay policy to 100kb seems to have little upside for monetary use. (I could understand a slight increase to help potential current / futures L2 without giving too much space for images) The argument”otherwise spams go elsewhere in more harmful way” like in utxo set seems wrong to me. 1) they will continue doing that also as it is less expensive 2) I agree with Luke argument that it is not the same profoundly for an image (potentially unlawful) to be stored and coded in a place “specially done for arbitrary data so images for instance” in the protocol and in a place whose usage is changed by the spammers So I don’t understand the core change in relay policy However I see a lot of people I like and admire supporting the change and being obsessed by Bitcoin as money (and working on it hard) so I would like to understand genuinely their position (ignoring the toxicity of some of people on the other side or the willingness to show support to maintainers that have been harassed etc) @Matt Corallo @npub1tmlh...ung4 @Giacomo Zucco (not supporting change in relay policy but strongly opposing BIP-110 so different pos) @calle

And their products are amazing I can attest. Goal is Bitcoiners try the products because they want to spend bitcoin, and then, once amazed, offer some to non-Bitcoiners that then have to use bitcoin to get some more View quoted note →

Don’t nostr & wine you can end up sending spotify links to sad songs to everyone inc. ceo of spotify competitor.. and can’t delete..

Lorsque le bitcoin s’effondre, la schadenfreude envahit le monde.

The thing is drunk noting is much better - and worse - when you can’t delete

@jack we love you, you are doing so much You have also the best head of strategy research at block, her name is Danielle Flam : she is so smart and a good person that it hurts Also listen to this song you will like it I believe.

Spotify

Slow Century

André Herman Düne · Not on Top · Song · 2005

And I am so grateful for nostr You will be adorable And I will be staying on the west coast of Florida

Bought bitcoin for first time at 8k eur in 2020. I am at my cost now. It is fine and ready to sink with the ship. So much bigger than us friends ✊🫡

Non kyc bitcoin trades 15 pct higher

I believe it is the best song of the XXIst century but I am cute when it is late and bitcoin is down 30 pct in 3 days

Spotify

Slow Century

André Herman Düne · Not on Top · Song · 2005