More signs, now in the USA: Digital identity is just around the corner
U.S. Lawmakers proposed the GUARD Act, which aims to regulate AI chatbots by requiring companies to verify the age of users before granting access, ensuring children are protected from inappropriate technology. The act introduces a universal ID system for online speech.
Read this? THE ACT INTRODUCES A UNIVERSAL ID SYSTEM FOR ONLINE SPEECH.

NaturalNews.com
Lawmakers debate the future of AI and online privacy with new GUARD Act proposal – NaturalNews.com
Sen. Josh Hawley raised alarms about AI chatbots posing a threat to children, while Sen. Richard Blumenthal emphasized the need for stronger tech r...
No DId, No Technocracy.
Signals of #Technocracy
The United States is seeking to strengthen the dollar.
And I believe this will be implemented with stablecoins issued by major American banks.
The initial test will be with developing countries.
The e-dollar will be the next step.
'US pushes for wider global dollar adoption'
https://www.ft.com/content/fae0ec80-1d65-429b-9147-90bf911d9001
Human history can be read as a sequence of supports for transmitting information: clay, papyrus, paper, and silicon.
Each one altered the way ideas travel, are preserved, and controlled — and with that, how civilizations organize themselves.
The medium through which it is transmitted is not neutral: they shape the collective mind, determine what is remembered and what is forgotten, and configure the power structures that govern words and thought.
After publishing the Preface and Introduction of my book, Chapter 1 is now published: 'Understanding The Information Age. The Sovereign Individual.'
https://medium.com/@liberlion/understanding-the-information-age-the-sovereign-individual-index-eea277fe6bef
Hey #Monero devs, I've said it before, and I'll say it again...please, TOTAL ANONYMITY!!
Egos aside, for your own good and the good of the entire ecosystem!!!
I don't want to sow panic or sensationalism, but you will be persecuted, but see the signals!!
In The Rage article, we read that: "[...] According to the prosecution's sentencing memorandum, the developers laundered "at least $237 million in proceeds from drug trafficking, darknet marketplaces, cyber-intrusions, frauds, murder-for-hire schemes, and a child pornography [...] "The defendants’ crimes are not predicated on a regulatory lapse, but on the defendants’ unambiguous desire, intent, and actions taken to help criminals engage in money laundering and sanctions evasion through Samourai," the indictment further reads."
PS: The Rage is a media outlet that focuses on what matters... What excellent in-depth analysis articles!!
View quoted note →
Selling #privacy and charging via PayPal or credit card is like promising anonymity while demanding ID at the door.
It might be a great product, but what you're doing borders on cybersecurity stand-up comedy.
That's why #Monero
Are you interested in #privacy and your sovereignty as a person?
I suggest you broaden your analysis to understand what's coming.
Look at the context; take a step back to see the bigger picture. We are heading towards #technocracy, and this will be the biggest problem we will face as individuals.
I recommend an interesting site: technocracy.news
Uncle Sam's empire in the 21st century
...there is another Uncle Sam associated with Uncle Sam.
Sam Altman is building a global infrastructure connecting AI, biometrics, blockchain, energy, and digital payments — with UBI as a hypothesis for massive redistribution — using Worldcoin (formerly Worldcoin) for identity and payments, and OpenAI for wealth generation and automation.
Altman heads OpenAI (AI research & commercialization) and co-founded Tools for Humanity, behind Worldcoin/“World” (digital identity + token).
The backdrop: automation + AI → job displacement → need for a new value model.
World builds “World ID”: iris-scan biometric verification + blockchain to certify that someone is a “real human”. Already millions scanned in multiple countries.
Meanwhile, OpenAI is raising massive infrastructure: multi-gigawatt data centres, huge energy and hardware demands. This is the foundation of scale for the whole system.
Here’s the hypothesis: Altman isn’t just running these projects separately. He’s articulating a system composed of:
• Global biometric identity (World)
• Token/digital payments
• AI + energy infrastructure (OpenAI)
• A state or quasi-state application to redistribute value (UBI)
In effect: an “empire of surveillance + service” rather than just a technology startup.
How does the state figure in?
• World has digital identity agreements or ambitions with governments/regions.
• OpenAI’s infrastructure projects need regulatory, energy, and state support: a public-private nexus.
This opens the door for governments to license or embed this private infrastructure into core public functions.
The risk: a technocracy.
When a private actor controls the technical layer of identity + payments + AI and then offers it to the state, power shifts toward infrastructure.
Governance becomes less about the elected process, more about “who controls the tech”.
Real brakes:
• Biometric data regulation in Europe is tightening.
• The energy bottleneck for AI infrastructure is real: powering multi-gigawatt systems isn’t trivial.
As part of my social media protocol:
“If you don’t believe it or don’t understand — I don’t have the time to try to convince you, sorry.” — Satoshi Nakamoto.
I consider this quote very useful, so as not to waste time with those who do not deserve the effort, and I add that I intend to awaken critical thinking in those who are prepared for it.
Always DYOR.
My hypothesis on what the first version of on-chain KYC in Bitcoin will be and how it will be implemented.
Can you see the signals and connect them to form patterns?
—The United States is gradually promoting and legislating Bitcoin as a state or institutional store of value (“treasury”).
—Institutional investment in Bitcoin requires stronger controls/regulations.
—Governments/bankers cannot afford to allow an asset over which they have no control.
—To have that control, they need to identify users and transactions, not more pseudo-anonymity.
—Around the world, to varying degrees, regulators are promoting different methods for Digital Identity.
It is very likely that, to avoid generating too much backlash, the first version of on-chain KYC in Bitcoin will be zero-knowledge proofs, which allow the creation of reusable verified identities with high levels of privacy through cryptographic proofs, preventing companies from storing sensitive data but allowing for auditing and regulatory compliance when necessary.
These solutions are already being designed to adapt to international regulations and facilitate the monitoring of transactions without compromising individual privacy "too much".
This type of KYC won't necessarily mean that all BTC transactions will require identification, but it will enable an ecosystem where, for certain layers (such as ETFs, institutional DeFi services, banks, and public institutions), identity verification will be a condition of access or use.
That's where the normies disguised as rebels without a cause will have some leeway to defend this surveillance system.
So what would be the ultimate proof that a platform, system, or network is nothing but a surveillance tool—no more room for soft-landing excuses about ‘grey zones’?
Easy: it’s when KYC (know your customer) plus digital identity becomes mandatory.
Bitcoin, Zcash, X, and all those networks that claim, ‘We’re the rebels.’ At that moment, they can’t say they’re fighting for freedom—they’re just signing up for someone watching their every move, asking for permission.
But of course, there will always be the ‘normies’ masquerading as rebels without a cause, proudly defending regulatory compliance like it’s their new cause du jour… while hunting for clever rationalisations to pretend that mass surveillance is just another ‘tool-with-benefits’.
This book was written in 1997
View quoted note →
"A VPN is not a tool for anonymity, and while it can protect your location from some companies, there are many other ways companies may track you. [..] If you are interested in increased anonymity, Tor is a better solution than a VPN. A VPN provider can see your device’s traffic, but because of the way Tor is designed, no single Tor server can see your browsing data."
Choosing the VPN That's Right for You
VPN stands for “Virtual Private Network.” When you connect to a VPN, all data that you send (such as the requests to servers when browsing the ...
My book:
“Understanding the Information Age: The Sovereign Individual”
is inspired by the book:
“The Sovereign Individual: Mastering the Transition to the Information Age” by James Dale Davidson and Lord William Rees-Mogg (1997).
It was a prophetic book for its time and was little understood.
In my book, I update the central idea of that book to the 21st century.
I invite you to read this great book, one of my favorites.

The Sovereign Individual
In my new book, 𑁋Understanding The Information Age. The Sovereign Individual𑁋 where I’m publishing each of its 10 chapters periodically, every closing section offers more than reflection: it proposes concrete actions for the Sovereign Individual.
What does it mean to be sovereign as a person?
It’s not a political slogan or a digital pose. It’s a daily practice of freedom with responsibility.
The sovereign individual exercises freedom with awareness, critical thinking, and accountability. The sovereign individual doesn’t repeat slogans—they examine them.
The sovereign individual acts with integrity, empathy, and resilience. Her/his compass isn’t fashion or approval, but ethical principles and self-knowledge.
Being sovereign means not delegating judgment or destiny to external structures. Neither the State, nor corporations, nor algorithms decide for you.
The sovereign individual knows that freedom without awareness becomes egoism, and awareness without action becomes passivity. Balance is key.
The sovereign individual acts in two ways: collectively, spreading the ideas of freedom; and individually, creating tools and strategies to preserve it.
Collectively, sharing knowledge, fostering critical thought, and supporting projects that expand human autonomy.
Individually, designing strategies to protect their privacy, time, and ability to decide without coercion.
The sovereign individual doesn’t wait for leaders. They build their own path, knowing that true independence is born from judgment and courage.
Understanding The Information Age. The Sovereign Individual.
https://medium.com/@liberlion/understanding-the-information-age-the-sovereign-individual-index-eea277fe6bef
Why Crypto Market Cap Misleads
Market cap makes it seem like a cryptocurrency’s value has a solid foundation, but it’s actually a misleading metric that often distorts reality.
In practice, market cap simply multiplies the last price paid by the total circulating coins; this number can be inflated with just a single transaction at a high price.
It does not represent the real financial commitment from investors.
If a token has a huge supply and someone buys one unit at an artificial price, the project appears valuable, when in reality, only a minuscule amount of money was ever invested.
The circulating supply itself is often poorly estimated. Lost coins, long-term hoards, and illiquid assets are counted as “circulating,” further distorting the picture.
This gives the illusion of liquidity and value that simply doesn’t exist in practice.
Market cap variation does not mean funds are entering or leaving the market. Large shifts in “valuation” can be triggered by tiny amounts traded, making the metric highly speculative and unreliable.
Comparing market caps between cryptocurrencies is fundamentally flawed. Each project has its own design, user base, utility, and risks, rendering these rankings mostly irrelevant for meaningful analysis.
Many use market cap because it’s simple, familiar, and easy to headline; it is marketing, but it dangerously oversimplifies a complex ecosystem.
It’s much better to analyze fundamentals, real usage, developer activity, and liquidity when assessing project value.
Don’t be tricked by surface-level numbers.
Dive deeper—true value calls for skepticism and research, not blind trust in manipulated statistics disguised as financial truth.
Freedom, honesty, and honorability keep me on track.
If I wanted to increase exposure and the number of followers on social media, I would post other content, content that most people would applaud, but that “priority” would violate my principles.
Read 👇🏻
View quoted note →
The road to global technocracy.
View quoted note →
Principles are immutable, priorities are not.
Life is a constant trade-off; there is nothing perfect that can satisfy you completely all the time.
That is why it is a matter of choosing priorities.
But priorities are needs that change over time; principles do not.
Those who confuse a principle with a need change it because their priorities change, and end up destroying their principles.
Principles are immutable, priorities are not.
Mine are these three:
𑁋Freedom: choice without fear or dependence.
𑁋Honesty: truth, coherence, transparency, respect.
𑁋Honorability: dignity, integrity, conduct, reputation.
What are yours?
Who finances Monero, Session, and Nostr?
Who finances and invests in Bitcoin, Simplex/Signal, and X?
Follow the money trail to understand.
If your #privacy depends on regulated money, you don’t have privacy — you have a permission slip with an expiry date.
View quoted note →
Are you interested in #privacy?
Do you want to combine money, private messaging, and social networking?
Nothing is perfect, and you have to make trade-offs; without friction, there is no privacy.
This is the best combination I've found today.
It also includes the money trail, because it's important to see the flow of capital to understand the destination and intention.
#SovereignIndividual
View quoted note →