LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion
liberlion@iris.to
npub1wpzp...zs7p
Writer • Sci-Facts Thinker • 𝔸𝕀 • Ϛʁyptø • Monero • 𝙰𝚐𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚖 | 𝕏 @liberlion17 | liberlion.com | liberlion.medium.com | 84y8yKaEFfeYj5Wyh7DZvb3aMvu18zhu7XF1b8TQZFWaS4GF323jr6NJstEeajdDVKTNvAvGUzogfEbbHFKnBVJTNBQTFNX
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 2 months ago
**YOU WILL BE TOKENIZED: THE INTERNAUTA** image It’s not a question. It’s a certainty. First, they tokenized money: CBDCs, “regulated” stablecoins, and wallets with mandatory KYC. Then they tokenized your property: your house, your car, your stocks… everything turned into RWAs (Real World Assets) on permissioned blockchains that only banks and governments can validate. And finally, it will be your turn. You, the human being, will be the last asset to be tokenized. Your unique biometric digital identity (DID, SSI, eIDAS 2.0, Worldcoin—call it whatever you want) will be the non-transferable token that binds you forever to the chain. A soul-bound token of flesh and blood. Without that token: -You won’t connect to the internet (they’re already testing it: “human-bound accounts”, “proof-of-personhood”). -You won’t receive your programmable UBI. -You won’t travel. -You won’t buy anything. -You won’t even be able to post what you’re reading right now. They’ll sell you tokenization as “empowerment”: “You will control your own data!”, “Self-sovereign identity!”, “Goodbye passwords!” And you’ll believe it… until you discover that “sovereignty” has a tiny clause written in fine print: revocable at any time for “national security”, for “disinformation”, for low social credit, or simply because your token expired and you didn’t renew your subscription to the system. You will become THE INTERNAUTA: an identified user, fully traceable, censorable, and, above all, deactivatable with a single click. Welcome to the world where EVERYTHING is on blockchain… including you. And when that day comes and you look back, wondering where it all started, remember this post. Because I won’t be able to tell you anymore: my token will have been burned long ago. #DID #Technocracy #Transhumanism
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 2 months ago
**Is price an attack?** With a 20% monthly drop, #Bitcoin looks like anything but “money”. _My L3 research protocol_ Layer 1, Surface: Price drops, everyone stares at red candles, headlines scream “crypto = casino”. Layer 2, Depth: Volatility isn’t just a market quirk; it’s the perfect vector to discredit. Regulators don’t need to ban what they can delegitimize. A sharp downturn works as free propaganda, reinforcing the idea that fiat is the “stable” refuge, even when real inflation says otherwise. Layer 3, Hidden Structure: Is price an attack? You don’t need daily manipulation, just a fragmented market, shallow liquidity and CEX dependence. Instability becomes a political tool, not a financial one. The implicit conclusion they want you to accept is neat: “If it isn’t stable, it isn’t money.” The premise is circular, built so that state money always wins.
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 2 months ago
When might #Monero be in a hurry? When governments crack down with regulations and bans on its mining and use. What might Monero be in a hurry to do? To develop a resilient ecosystem, including technology and community. View quoted note →
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 2 months ago
What do you see here? image Perhaps technological evolution. I see signals of #Technocracy #AI #Transhumanism Why? The shift from representative democracy to algorithmic democracy requires unconditional force, maintaining a monopoly on violence, and performing essential tasks to retain power.
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 2 months ago
Mesh Networks: A Partial Solution to the De-anonymization of the Internet As I have explained in other posts, I believe that it won't be long before governments implement Digital Identity for each person for internet connections, requiring internet providers to use a single user ID, as is the case with intranets in connections between companies and their employees. Many people view mesh networks as a potential solution to escape digital identity. But the global scale with current mesh network technology is impractical. Let me explain. They work, okay, but not as a “global parallel internet,” rather as archipelagos. The real problem is global scalability. Each local mesh maintains communication between neighbors without going through providers or state authentication. Each node connects wirelessly to nearby nodes, retransmits packets, and builds dynamic routes. Several meshes are federated using long-range radios or bridge nodes with external output. The most commonly used technical bases are: -802.11s, the Wi-Fi standard for meshes. -OLSR and BATMAN, protocols that calculate the best route between nodes. -LoRa/LoRaWAN, for long distances with very little bandwidth. -Directional radios at 5 GHz or 60 GHz for powerful links between high points. To connect these islands, long-range radio links, high-altitude equipment, mobile bridge nodes, and, where possible, small satellite outlets would be needed. Technically, it is possible to scale by federating meshes, just as the internet was born by connecting separate networks. However, the problem lies not in the software, but in the physical world: regulated spectrum, energy, interference, range, and the risk of equipment being blocked. A mesh can sustain local autonomy, hide identities, and reduce surveillance, although the global scale will always be more fragile and slower. Furthermore, in a 5-hop mesh, your effective bandwidth can drop to a fraction. Interference, distance, obstacles, and legal transmission power limit it even further. The real debate is how much state control a society can withstand before seeking lateral channels. View quoted note →
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
**Digital Identity for Everyone** tag: Dialogues for Technocracy People: Alright! The implementation of a blockchain for voting in democracies and preventing fraud is highly innovative. Politicians: See? When technology works, everything becomes simpler. Now we just need to activate your secure access to the civic network. People: Secure access? Politicians: Yes, every citizen will have a unique cryptographic key. It’s the same one you use to vote, but it also authenticates you for public services, banking, healthcare and, eventually, for going online. Remember? the everything blockchain People: For going online? Politicians: Don’t worry, it’s not surveillance, it’s responsible traceability. Like a blockchain, every action is recorded, but only you decide which part is visible. Full control. People: And if I don’t want anything recorded? Politicians: The network must verify who you are, not what you do. Big difference. This prevents bots, trolls, fake accounts and digital terrorism. People: I… guess that makes sense. Politicians: Also, with mandatory digital signatures, every public interaction becomes safer. Comments, purchases, paperwork, everything verified. People: Mandatory? Politicians: For your own protection. Like a seatbelt. Annoying at first, lifesaving later. And it keeps the digital space in order. People: And if something breaks? What if the network goes down? Politicians: There’s an offline mode with limits. Just like the digital euro. Nothing to worry about. People: So… what’s next? Politicians: Now we need your approval for the second phase: integrating identity, voting and your online activity into a single citizen profile. People: And how do I vote on that? Politicians: Easy, just log in with your Digital ID, sign with your key, and you’re all set. People: Yeah… I had a feeling. View quoted note →
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
On some platforms, it is called Account, on others User, on X it is called Profile. Think about the predictive algorithm. Do you understand? image
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
**Zcash: The Everything Blockchain** The Zcash lobby is no coincidence. tag: Dialogues for Technocracy People: Oh, there's a lot of fraud in voting. Corruption is rampant. Politicians: Well, we can digitize voting on the blockchain, with a model of transparency that preserves the secrecy of the vote. People: Oh, and how does that work? Politicians: Well, there is a technology called zero-knowledge, which means that although the public network can record that you have voted, who you voted for remains secret, even though it can be counted. People: Oh, but that network can't be attacked, and the records changed? Politicians: No, look at the case of Bitcoin. It's open source, pseudo-anonymous, has been hack-free for over 15 years, and historical information remains immutable. Although it doesn't have zero-knowledge technology, it can be implemented, just as Zcash has it, where privacy is decided by each user depending on the case. People: Ah, it is fantastic, so it could be used for secret voting, and also to transmit value, tokens, or whatever information you want, and I decide what to share or what to keep private, right? Politicians: Exactly, you've understood it very well. It could be a blockchain for various uses, centralized and regulated, but with open source code that all citizens can audit. People: That's great! And when could it be implemented? Politicians: We need the people's vote to implement it. People: Fantastic, when are the elections?
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
**THE INTERNAUTA IN THE DIGITAL PRISON** Technocracy is on its way; there are many signs: it will be algorithmic democracy that most people will celebrate. EVERYTHING WILL BE DIGITAL AND TOKENIZED. AUGMENTED REALITY WILL BE THE STANDARD. The main element of this new model of government will be Digital Identity. With a universal digital identification, you will have your digital document online. That is why the internet will not be anonymous, and universal personal identification to be online will be mandatory. You will be the INTERNAUTA. How will they get the majority to accept it and make it sustainable without causing a massive global revolution? Simple: provoked events, false flags, the old problem-reaction-solution strategy. You think it's science fiction, but it already happened recently with the pandemic, when most people accepted lockdowns and mandatory vaccines. It was a test. It's very easy when coordination is on a large scale and technology allows it. Being 100% offline will be a luxury that only a few will be able to afford; they will be the “digital homeless.” Some of us will be able to be offline 50% of the time. On social media, it's not enough to keep quiet and observe, or even give likes, because they know what you're looking at closely. They profile you today. Think about private communication platforms, such as Session, which I value myself, or private finances, such as #Monero, which I also value. Will they be usable with a universal internet connection credential on a de-anonymized network? I don't know how I will maintain my personal sovereignty, but I know I will try. I hope you can maintain your focus and philosophy to remain a sovereign individual in pursuit of your freedom. **When that happens, you won't see me around here.**
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
**SELF-CENSOR / THE INTERNAUTA** In a few years, censorship will be so widespread that regulators won't even need to impose it; you will do it yourself. You wouldn't say half of what you say today if you felt the sword of Damocles hanging over your head. Not even on decentralized networks, because they will also know who you are. How will that happen? With the personal identifier that internet providers will be required to assign to every person who connects. They will give it an appealing name and justify the need for its use for network security. You will be the INTERNAUTA and you will have your Credential. There are signs that we are moving in this direction. The model already exists today. Want an example? The intranet in companies. You are not the administrator of the PC you use, and you connect to the internet through a company server, with your username and employee file. **The internet will no longer be anonymous. You will be the INTERNAUTA, and your own censor.**
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
**The Fake Cypherpunks** ᶜᵒ⁻ᵒᵖᵗ ᵗʰᵉ ˡᵃⁿᵍᵘᵃᵍᵉ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵈᵉᶠᵃⁿᵍ ᵗʰᵉ ⁱᵈᵉᵃ If you can't beat them, join them, and corrupt them from within. The old and well-known Trojan Horse strategy remains effective. Every era manufactures its impostors, but ours industrialises them. Anyone with a cryptic logo and a privacy slogan calls themselves a cypherpunk, even if their entire business model depends on pleasing regulators. Look at the contrast. The Tornado Cash developers published code and got hit by half the state apparatus. Samourai Wallet promoted real and operational privacy, but ultimately faced the same authorities, with its developers ending up in jail. Those reactions expose a simple truth: effective privacy bothers power. And whatever bothers power gets hunted down. Now compare that with the corporate cosplay version of a 匚ㄚρђ𝑒rρuᶰķ, the Winklevoss twins. Gemini, a fully registered exchange, Cypherpunk Technologies, a Wall Street-approved investment vehicle with heavy bets on Zcash, a chain created by a company registered with the government, which files financial statements with the IRS, and in which privacy is pre-filtered so that it never becomes a nuisance. It is anonymity with a seatbelt, engineered not to upset the regulatory ecosystem. The issue isn’t their existence; the issue is the narrative. They sell themselves as rebels while operating comfortably inside the palace walls. That appropriation is strategic. Co-opt the language and defang the idea. Fake cypherpunks don’t break rules; they manage them. They don’t challenge power; they stylize. True #privacy lies elsewhere, in people's attitudes, in everyday practice, and far from press releases and balance sheets.
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
My respect and support go out to these two great developers. #freeSamourai But, as I have been saying for some time, when you create privacy tools, you must remain anonymous, because you are a threat to regulators and to the state itself. No government accepts complete privacy for individuals. If you are a privacy tool developer, remain anonymous. The design of their software was brilliant; this was Bill and Keonne's mistake 👇 image
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
What does this mean? A message from the government: if you are a developer, don't dare challenge our surveillance. My message: if you are a developer, anonymity is the solution. View quoted note →
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
What does this mean? A message from the government: if you are a developer, don't dare challenge our surveillance. My message: if you are a developer, anonymity is the solution. View quoted note →
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
**Well done, guys! You're getting it done on time and in the right way!** 😈 The digital euro arrives “to modernize payments”, yet somehow its pilot lands in 2027, launch in 2029, tidy limit of 3,000–4,000 euros “for your safety”, and even smaller offline caps “to prevent crime”. And, what a coincidence, perfectly on schedule for the 2030 Agenda. Control never misses a deadline.
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
What would have happened if Sigartis had posted on #Nostr using vpn instead of 𝕏? **Nothing, he would have been able to sleep peacefully without the police at his house.** The G7 countries will be the first to meet the #Technocracy #Agenda2030 Surveillance will be extreme. ᴸᵉᵗ ᵀʰᵉʳᵉ ᴮᵉ ᴰᵃʳᵏ🏴a³ Lunarpunk🌒 That's why #Monero #agorist #monerist #SovereignIndividual View quoted note →
LiberLion's avatar
LiberLion 3 months ago
**Soft on the surface, dense underneath** L3 is my main research protocol. L3 is my way of reading the world without getting fooled by the shine. First comes the **surface**, the visible layer, the easy story anyone can repeat. Then I drop into the **depths**, where context, incentives and hidden actors start to shape the picture. Finally, I reach the **underlying structure**, the uncomfortable layer that reveals why everything above is arranged as it is. L3 isn’t about certainties, it’s about signals and patterns. And once the patterns show up, you start seeing that very little is accidental.