I wonder how difficult it is for hackers to play around with different LLMs, “trying their luck” to find bugs in the different blockchains in their open source code. I wonder the same thing about developers auditing their own code. The skill lies in knowing what to attack; the #AI will tell you how. See this 👇🏻 Hey #Monero Community, check this out. On November 21, 2025, an incident occurred on the Cardano mainnet that caused a temporary disruption: Someone deliberately sent a malformed delegation transaction (a type of transaction used to delegate ADA to a stake pool). This transaction caused a bug in the Cardano node that caused part of the network to start producing an “invalid” chain (a temporary fork). For over an hour, block production slowed down significantly, and on the invalid chain, 846 blocks were reorganized (chain reorg). According to Charles Hoskinson (founder of Cardano), the culprit was a disgruntled stake pool operator belonging to the “Fake Fred” group/discord (a group known for harshly criticizing Charles and IOHK). The attack was specifically directed at Charles' personal stake pool, with the aid of #AI. The attacker first said publicly that it had been “a personal challenge with no malicious intent,” but Charles insists that it was a premeditated attack and that an FBI investigation is already underway. Perhaps when there are attacks against Monero, we should report them to the FBI. I propose creating a Monero security committee, with five bureaucrats in charge, to be voted on by the community 😂

I don't know what the outcome will be, or how or when, but I am convinced of one thing: the transition will begin to take shape in less than three years, and it will be painful for most people. Signals of #Technocracy #Agenda2030 #AI #Transhumanism

This will happen at some point. People will validate it. UBI. I invite you to reflect on this topic.

**I don't write to guard an asset; I write to contribute to a flow.** And a flow needs openness: #Monero Philosophy I have published more than 550 articles, each averaging 10 minutes of reading time, in various media outlets, such as: 1. https://n9.cl/pntlse 2. https://n9.cl/jogbu I am currently publishing my first book, chapter by chapter, regularly (every 15 or 20 days): "Understanding The Information Age. The Sovereign Individual." https://medium.com/@liberlion/understanding-the-information-age-the-sovereign-individual-index-eea277fe6bef I have invested many hours of work over the past five years, with my wife as my editor. I follow the same philosophy as Monero, which has no VC, only the collaboration and willingness of its community for development. I have no sponsors, only the goodwill of my community of readers. You may or may not be interested in what I write, you may or may not like my writing style, and I may be considered a good writer or a bad one. I accept all of that. But there is one thing I stand by and no one can doubt it: I practice what I preach. **I believe in decentralization, open source, and the freedom and free dissemination of ideas.** I don't believe in locking ideas and knowledge behind a legal lock. Information lives when it circulates, inspires, and transforms. That's why I adhere to Creative Commons. I prefer a framework that encourages sharing over one that starts with prohibition. Traditional copyright works as a defensive reflex, designed for a world where copying was expensive and slow. Today it's the opposite: copying is natural, and stopping that circulation ends up destroying the potential of what has been created. Creative Commons allows me to do something simple, almost obvious, but revolutionary in this context: to release my work in a voluntary environment where people can use it, share it, and learn without asking permission from a bureaucrat. And the analogy is clear: it is the same spirit that sustains free software and the FOSS movement. Open source thrived because thousands of people were able to study, modify, and improve it without restrictions. A text released under CC works the same way; it is cooperative knowledge that grows when others touch it, not when it is immobilized by a lawyer. I don't write to guard an asset; I write to contribute to a flow. And a flow needs openness.

**The Internet Will Be the New Global Intranet** The Internet is an open, global network with no single owner. An intranet is a private, closed network controlled by an organization. The Internet is anonymous. An intranet requires a personal identifier to access. The Internet is like a public street; anyone can use it. An intranet is like a company's internal hallway; only those with permission can pass through. On the Internet, a VPN hides your origin and geolocation because you change the exit point. On an intranet, this makes no sense because the network owner controls everything and can see your permissions and movements. Even if you tunnel, you remain within the highway. In less than 10 years, the Internet will be a global intranet.

Perhaps the future is not a world without money but a world where money as we know it no longer matters. What circulates are not bills or bank balances but encrypted values: shared secrets, verifiable proofs, access to the essential. An economy without a center and without a single unit of measure, made of multiple mirrors, where AI is not a spectator but a silent architect. And where paradox becomes the rule: closed tokens on open ledgers. It is not a collapse, but a mutation. It is not the end of money, but its definitive encryption. And the challenge will be simple and brutal: learning to live in a world where value is not shown, but proven. I have published the third chapter of my book: **Understanding The Information Age. The Sovereign Individual. ─Chapter 3** https://medium.com/@liberlion/understanding-the-information-age-the-sovereign-individual-chapter-3-c5aa6f2aadf9

Monero in the Agorist Paradise ᴰᵒ ʸᵒᵘ ʷᵃⁿᵗ ᵗᵒ ˡⁱᵛᵉ ⁱⁿ ᵗʰᵉ ᵍᵒˡᵈᵉⁿ ᶜᵃᵍᵉ ᵒʳ ⁱⁿ ᵗʰᵉ ᶠʳᵉᵉ ʲᵘⁿᵍˡᵉ? In the G7 countries, the machinery runs too well. Surveillance capitalism serves as the lubricant that binds corporations, governments, and platforms into a massive state apparatus by default. With abundant technology and rules that scale frictionlessly, every administrative “upgrade” reinforces the same logic: more data, more traceability, more #Technocracy. In that ecosystem, anything that smells like anonymity, decentralization, or economic resistance is regulated first and banned later. The use and mining of #Monero and other natively private cryptocurrencies go straight onto that list. The 3rd world, on the other hand, lives in a kind of permanent glitch. Lack of resources, leaky bureaucracies, and states unable to close all circuits. That disorder, often seen as a weakness, becomes the perfect breeding ground for what global powers cannot tolerate: countereconomies. The Agora evolves In the 3rd World, parallel markets thrive, informal exchanges multiply, gray areas expand, and economic circuits operate far from the radar. And in that ecosystem, Monero can be used naturally and mined without draconian bans, without absurd energy audits, and without the obsession for total traceability, not because the regulators in these countries do not want to, but because they do not have the technological or economic resources to develop them. The dilemma becomes personal. Do you want comfort or room to maneuver? Do you want to live in the golden cage or in the free jungle? The G7 offers the golden cage, climate-controlled, efficient, and fully visible. The developing world offers the wild jungle, uncomfortable, sure, but fertile for anyone seeking real autonomy. The task is to find countries that have an adequate balance between the golden cage and the jungle, so that the jungle is not an impossible desert to live in. In general, several Latin American countries are ideal. This is not romanticizing poverty. It is a map of incentives. On one side, societies where every transaction is a data point. On the other hand, territories where an alternative agora can still be built and where you can move without an algorithm deciding your fate. If you are a #SovereignIdividual, you decide between comfort and more friction in your struggle, or more friction in your standard of living but greater freedom. #monerist #agorist

The system surpasses people. There are no owners of the system, only temporary tenants. When there is a solid, interconnected, and scalable system, no person is superior to it, even if they participated in its creation or development, because sooner or later, they will end up submerged and subsumed in the system. When #AI manages the system, this will become even more evident.

**YOU WILL BE TOKENIZED: THE INTERNAUTA** It’s not a question. It’s a certainty. First, they tokenized money: CBDCs, “regulated” stablecoins, and wallets with mandatory KYC. Then they tokenized your property: your house, your car, your stocks… everything turned into RWAs (Real World Assets) on permissioned blockchains that only banks and governments can validate. And finally, it will be your turn. You, the human being, will be the last asset to be tokenized. Your unique biometric digital identity (DID, SSI, eIDAS 2.0, Worldcoin—call it whatever you want) will be the non-transferable token that binds you forever to the chain. A soul-bound token of flesh and blood. Without that token: -You won’t connect to the internet (they’re already testing it: “human-bound accounts”, “proof-of-personhood”). -You won’t receive your programmable UBI. -You won’t travel. -You won’t buy anything. -You won’t even be able to post what you’re reading right now. They’ll sell you tokenization as “empowerment”: “You will control your own data!”, “Self-sovereign identity!”, “Goodbye passwords!” And you’ll believe it… until you discover that “sovereignty” has a tiny clause written in fine print: revocable at any time for “national security”, for “disinformation”, for low social credit, or simply because your token expired and you didn’t renew your subscription to the system. You will become THE INTERNAUTA: an identified user, fully traceable, censorable, and, above all, deactivatable with a single click. Welcome to the world where EVERYTHING is on blockchain… including you. And when that day comes and you look back, wondering where it all started, remember this post. Because I won’t be able to tell you anymore: my token will have been burned long ago. #DID #Technocracy #Transhumanism

**Is price an attack?** With a 20% monthly drop, #Bitcoin looks like anything but “money”. _My L3 research protocol_ Layer 1, Surface: Price drops, everyone stares at red candles, headlines scream “crypto = casino”. Layer 2, Depth: Volatility isn’t just a market quirk; it’s the perfect vector to discredit. Regulators don’t need to ban what they can delegitimize. A sharp downturn works as free propaganda, reinforcing the idea that fiat is the “stable” refuge, even when real inflation says otherwise. Layer 3, Hidden Structure: Is price an attack? You don’t need daily manipulation, just a fragmented market, shallow liquidity and CEX dependence. Instability becomes a political tool, not a financial one. The implicit conclusion they want you to accept is neat: “If it isn’t stable, it isn’t money.” The premise is circular, built so that state money always wins.

When might #Monero be in a hurry? When governments crack down with regulations and bans on its mining and use. What might Monero be in a hurry to do? To develop a resilient ecosystem, including technology and community. View quoted note →

What do you see here? Perhaps technological evolution. I see signals of #Technocracy #AI #Transhumanism Why? The shift from representative democracy to algorithmic democracy requires unconditional force, maintaining a monopoly on violence, and performing essential tasks to retain power.

X (formerly Twitter)

Elon Musk (@elonmusk) on X

Mesh Networks: A Partial Solution to the De-anonymization of the Internet As I have explained in other posts, I believe that it won't be long before governments implement Digital Identity for each person for internet connections, requiring internet providers to use a single user ID, as is the case with intranets in connections between companies and their employees. Many people view mesh networks as a potential solution to escape digital identity. But the global scale with current mesh network technology is impractical. Let me explain. They work, okay, but not as a “global parallel internet,” rather as archipelagos. The real problem is global scalability. Each local mesh maintains communication between neighbors without going through providers or state authentication. Each node connects wirelessly to nearby nodes, retransmits packets, and builds dynamic routes. Several meshes are federated using long-range radios or bridge nodes with external output. The most commonly used technical bases are: -802.11s, the Wi-Fi standard for meshes. -OLSR and BATMAN, protocols that calculate the best route between nodes. -LoRa/LoRaWAN, for long distances with very little bandwidth. -Directional radios at 5 GHz or 60 GHz for powerful links between high points. To connect these islands, long-range radio links, high-altitude equipment, mobile bridge nodes, and, where possible, small satellite outlets would be needed. Technically, it is possible to scale by federating meshes, just as the internet was born by connecting separate networks. However, the problem lies not in the software, but in the physical world: regulated spectrum, energy, interference, range, and the risk of equipment being blocked. A mesh can sustain local autonomy, hide identities, and reduce surveillance, although the global scale will always be more fragile and slower. Furthermore, in a 5-hop mesh, your effective bandwidth can drop to a fraction. Interference, distance, obstacles, and legal transmission power limit it even further. The real debate is how much state control a society can withstand before seeking lateral channels. View quoted note →

**Digital Identity for Everyone** tag: Dialogues for Technocracy People: Alright! The implementation of a blockchain for voting in democracies and preventing fraud is highly innovative. Politicians: See? When technology works, everything becomes simpler. Now we just need to activate your secure access to the civic network. People: Secure access? Politicians: Yes, every citizen will have a unique cryptographic key. It’s the same one you use to vote, but it also authenticates you for public services, banking, healthcare and, eventually, for going online. Remember? the everything blockchain People: For going online? Politicians: Don’t worry, it’s not surveillance, it’s responsible traceability. Like a blockchain, every action is recorded, but only you decide which part is visible. Full control. People: And if I don’t want anything recorded? Politicians: The network must verify who you are, not what you do. Big difference. This prevents bots, trolls, fake accounts and digital terrorism. People: I… guess that makes sense. Politicians: Also, with mandatory digital signatures, every public interaction becomes safer. Comments, purchases, paperwork, everything verified. People: Mandatory? Politicians: For your own protection. Like a seatbelt. Annoying at first, lifesaving later. And it keeps the digital space in order. People: And if something breaks? What if the network goes down? Politicians: There’s an offline mode with limits. Just like the digital euro. Nothing to worry about. People: So… what’s next? Politicians: Now we need your approval for the second phase: integrating identity, voting and your online activity into a single citizen profile. People: And how do I vote on that? Politicians: Easy, just log in with your Digital ID, sign with your key, and you’re all set. People: Yeah… I had a feeling. View quoted note →

On some platforms, it is called Account, on others User, on X it is called Profile. Think about the predictive algorithm. Do you understand?

**Zcash: The Everything Blockchain** The Zcash lobby is no coincidence. tag: Dialogues for Technocracy People: Oh, there's a lot of fraud in voting. Corruption is rampant. Politicians: Well, we can digitize voting on the blockchain, with a model of transparency that preserves the secrecy of the vote. People: Oh, and how does that work? Politicians: Well, there is a technology called zero-knowledge, which means that although the public network can record that you have voted, who you voted for remains secret, even though it can be counted. People: Oh, but that network can't be attacked, and the records changed? Politicians: No, look at the case of Bitcoin. It's open source, pseudo-anonymous, has been hack-free for over 15 years, and historical information remains immutable. Although it doesn't have zero-knowledge technology, it can be implemented, just as Zcash has it, where privacy is decided by each user depending on the case. People: Ah, it is fantastic, so it could be used for secret voting, and also to transmit value, tokens, or whatever information you want, and I decide what to share or what to keep private, right? Politicians: Exactly, you've understood it very well. It could be a blockchain for various uses, centralized and regulated, but with open source code that all citizens can audit. People: That's great! And when could it be implemented? Politicians: We need the people's vote to implement it. People: Fantastic, when are the elections?

This guy is a pain in the neck! 🤣 View quoted note →

**THE INTERNAUTA IN THE DIGITAL PRISON** Technocracy is on its way; there are many signs: it will be algorithmic democracy that most people will celebrate. EVERYTHING WILL BE DIGITAL AND TOKENIZED. AUGMENTED REALITY WILL BE THE STANDARD. The main element of this new model of government will be Digital Identity. With a universal digital identification, you will have your digital document online. That is why the internet will not be anonymous, and universal personal identification to be online will be mandatory. You will be the INTERNAUTA. How will they get the majority to accept it and make it sustainable without causing a massive global revolution? Simple: provoked events, false flags, the old problem-reaction-solution strategy. You think it's science fiction, but it already happened recently with the pandemic, when most people accepted lockdowns and mandatory vaccines. It was a test. It's very easy when coordination is on a large scale and technology allows it. Being 100% offline will be a luxury that only a few will be able to afford; they will be the “digital homeless.” Some of us will be able to be offline 50% of the time. On social media, it's not enough to keep quiet and observe, or even give likes, because they know what you're looking at closely. They profile you today. Think about private communication platforms, such as Session, which I value myself, or private finances, such as #Monero, which I also value. Will they be usable with a universal internet connection credential on a de-anonymized network? I don't know how I will maintain my personal sovereignty, but I know I will try. I hope you can maintain your focus and philosophy to remain a sovereign individual in pursuit of your freedom. **When that happens, you won't see me around here.**

Grok, show me signs that some lawmakers in some countries are proposing that the internet should not be anonymous: https://x.com/i/grok/share/sP6QVEQVsubaznmzpVHcy46M8 View quoted note →

**SELF-CENSOR / THE INTERNAUTA** In a few years, censorship will be so widespread that regulators won't even need to impose it; you will do it yourself. You wouldn't say half of what you say today if you felt the sword of Damocles hanging over your head. Not even on decentralized networks, because they will also know who you are. How will that happen? With the personal identifier that internet providers will be required to assign to every person who connects. They will give it an appealing name and justify the need for its use for network security. You will be the INTERNAUTA and you will have your Credential. There are signs that we are moving in this direction. The model already exists today. Want an example? The intranet in companies. You are not the administrator of the PC you use, and you connect to the internet through a company server, with your username and employee file. **The internet will no longer be anonymous. You will be the INTERNAUTA, and your own censor.**