They need AI for the #Technocracy infrastructure; otherwise, they won't be able to implement it.
They need a lot of energy to scale AI. Energy is the bottleneck.
Clean energy is neither sufficient nor efficient enough to power the AI industry. They will change the climate change narrative.
The same people who talk about clean energy will now say that new studies show that atomic energy is clean.
#Agenda2030 is not about saving the planet; it is about control, power, and money.
LiberLion
liberlion@iris.to
npub1wpzp...zs7p
Writer โข Sci-Facts Thinker โข ๐ธ๐ โข ฯสyptรธ โข Monero โข ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐
| ๐ @liberlion17 | liberlion.com | liberlion.medium.com | 84y8yKaEFfeYj5Wyh7DZvb3aMvu18zhu7XF1b8TQZFWaS4GF323jr6NJstEeajdDVKTNvAvGUzogfEbbHFKnBVJTNBQTFNX
What is politics in its essence?
Social engineering.
What is #Technocracy?
Social engineering on a massive scale.
Hey #privacy devs, read this ๐
What if Keonne and Bill had been residents of another country? Could they have been prosecuted?
If the developers of Samourai had been residents of any other corner of the world, but their servers, their service, or their physical structure were on US territory, the result would have been the same: automatic jurisdiction.
The principle of territoriality is unforgiving.
If you touch their financial infrastructure or set foot on their soil to do business, you become their subject in the eyes of the law, and they could seek your extradition (if there is an agreement between the United States and the country where you reside).
The warning is clear: True decentralization requires geographic intelligence, not just code. You cannot build tools of absolute freedom using the enemy's โbuilding blocksโ (servers, companies, accounts). If you give yourself away on their turf, don't be surprised when you hear the bolt lock.
Anonymity is the second layer of protection, and it is quite effective if well-maintained.
#Agenda2030
It's not about caring for the planet; it's about control, power, and money for an oligarchic caste.
**Transparency and Privacy**
When you see a politician using the term โtransparencyโ in their speech to show confidence and clarity of action, notice how they immediately link it to or imply that it must be โrestrictedโ for this to happen, presenting it as the opposite of transparency.
They deliberately confuse the public with the private. They misrepresent the transparency they should have with people's individual privacy.
Can you read the signs?
It's not just in the United States that there's a movement for "privacy" ๐
"On November 23, OKX announced in its Chinese blog that it will re-list Zcash, the most privacy-oriented cryptocurrency.[...]#Zcash (ZEC) is returning to OKX, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the global market.[...]The relisting is important, with OKX already delisting Zcash, Monero (XMR), and Dash (DASH) between January 4โ5, 2024. The delisting was a larger regulatory compliance initiative[...]


CoinGape
Zcash Price Soars 10% as OKX Eyes ZEC Relisting
Zcash price surged by 10% in the past 24 hours after news of OKX considering ZEC for relisting. The sudden rally pushed Zcash above $57, signaling
You are in the crypto industry to speculate on volatility for money.
I am in the crypto ecosystem for individual sovereignty.
You run after fiat.
I walk toward sovereignty.
We share technology, not destiny.
We are not the same.
**Two Antagonistic Responses**
What do Satoshi Nakamoto and Nicolas van Saberhagen have in common?
I'm not saying they're the same person, but rather that there is a characteristic that unites these two cryptographic developers.
They both share the same shadow: they choose to disappear so that their work can speak for itself.
Answer 1: the cypherpunk
Satoshi publishes Bitcoin and vanishes once the network is up and running.
Nicolas van Saberhagen appears only as the author of CryptoNote and also fades into anonymity.
They are united by that rare combination of technical genius, privacy maximalism, and zero interest in capitalizing on fame. They create game-changing infrastructure and, instead of climbing onto the pedestal, they break the pedestal and move on.
Both understood that, in decentralized systems, the figure of the creator is at risk of capture and cult status. And so they erase themselves.
A decision as cold as it is elegant.
Answer 2: the conspiracy theorist
Both developers are part of a government team (NSA or similar) that installs blockchain technology with different focuses: a traceable and untraceable ledger.
Like the precursor to the internet, ARPA, created in the late 1960s by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or Tor, created by the US Naval Research Laboratory in the mid-1990s, to control them in ways we don't even know yet.
MONERO MANIFESTO
By LiโฟฮสLiรธฮท๐ดaยณ
๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐.
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐.
๐ฒ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐. ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข.
๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐โ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐; ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐; ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐; ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข, ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข, ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐-๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐: ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ฟ๐๐๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ต๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข: ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข, ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐-๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐.
๐ด๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
๐ด๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข.
๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐: ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐๐๐๐๐.
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐; ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐.
แดธแตแต แตสฐแตสณแต แดฎแต แดฐแตสณแต๐ดaยณ Lunarpunk ๐
That's why #Monero
#agorist #monerist
#SovereignIndividual

LiเธฟฮตสLiรธฮท
Monero Manifesto
By LiโฟฮสLiรธฮท๐ดaยณ Monero means money for the sovereign individual. The state said that without permission, there can be no trade. Monero pr...
YOU CHOOSE WHICH CRYPTO ECOSYSTEM YOU WANT TO BE PART OF.
What a great time to understand the crypto ecosystem.
Let's take two contrasting developments: #Cardano vs #Monero.
Cardano's genesis block dates back to September 23, 2017 (8+ years).
Cardano emulates the republican system of governance, creating an ADA currency as a vehicle for governance (holders vote) and finance, emulating the traditional banking and investment system, tokenizing it with smart contracts.
Monero's genesis block dates back to April 18, 2014 (11+ years).
Monero has anarchist governance (no hierarchical authority), the community coordinates voluntarily and spontaneously, and has only one goal: to create XMR, a privacy coin as sovereign money.
Cardano seeks approval from the state and regulators, while Monero confronts them.
IOG is the company that developed Cardano, which manages a million-dollar budget and claims to have โmore than 400 people spread across 50+ countriesโ according to its official website:
Cardano has a treasury that is financed by a transaction tax, which the algorithm retains directly and deposits into a fund.
Through the ADA governance mechanism, an allocation of USD โ 71 million was approved for IOG for 12 months of network development (96 million ADA) in August 2025.
A team of independent, mostly anonymous developers coordinate to develop Monero.
Monero does not charge tax on its transactions.
Monero's development is funded by voluntary contributions from the community through its Community Crowdfunding System (CCS)
On November 21, Cardano suffered an attack by a stakepool operator (which would be a miner in Monero) using AI to exploit an old bug in the testnet. The โpowerfulโ IOG team came to the rescue of the network and quickly fixed its own bug.
Monero has suffered many attacks since its creation. None were successful. The developer community took action to create solutions.
You choose the ecosystem.
Here is the chronology of the attacks: https://x.com/liberlion17/status/1957535535892701518

Input | Output
About Input Output - Input | Output
Where others see broken systems, we see opportunity. Input Output is a venture studio and systems company rethinking how the world connects, transa...

Cardano News: Community Approves $70M Core Dev Budget, Boosting ADA Price Prospects
Proposed technical implementations are designed to lead to increased developer activity and new use cases for applications on the network, contribu...
**DEVELOPERS ARE THE FIRST LINE OF ATTACK**
Pay close attention to developments in the cryptocurrency industry. I'm going to show you how panic is spreading among programmers.
I have been saying for some time that developers of privacy tools should remain anonymous to protect themselves from state attacks.
Now I will show you how the panic created is spreading to other developers in the industry for other reasons.
The state's message is clear: CRYPTO DEVELOPERS, WE ARE WATCHING YOU.
We have already seen how the development of privacy tools has been criminalized, with prosecutors treating privacy infrastructure as money transmission plus laundering, even when the core contribution is writing and running code.
Tornado Cash โ Alexey Pertsev (NL): 64-month sentence for money laundering via a mixer branded โfor criminalsโ.
Tornado Cash โ Roman Storm (US): Convicted for running an unlicensed money-transmitting business.
Samourai Wallet โ Rodriguez & Hill (US): 5 and 4 years for unlicensed money transmission and handling illicit funds.
Bitcoin Fog โ Roman Sterlingov (US): 12.5 years for laundering about $400M in crypto.
Now, a developer at IOG, the company that owns the Cardano Blockchain (yes, owns), has resigned due to fears of FBI raids, as he could be reported for making mistakes in his development that could harm third parties.
**Fear has been sown.**
I will continue to explore this topic in greater depth in an article.
Interview with Roman, better known online as effectfully, developer of the Plutus language at IOG:

effectfully
Roman, known better online as effectfully, is interviewed by Wouter and
Joachim. On his path to becoming a Plutus language developer at IOG, he
lea...

I wonder how difficult it is for hackers to play around with different LLMs, โtrying their luckโ to find bugs in the different blockchains in their open source code.
I wonder the same thing about developers auditing their own code.
The skill lies in knowing what to attack; the #AI will tell you how.
See this ๐๐ป
Hey #Monero Community, check this out.
On November 21, 2025, an incident occurred on the Cardano mainnet that caused a temporary disruption: Someone deliberately sent a malformed delegation transaction (a type of transaction used to delegate ADA to a stake pool).
This transaction caused a bug in the Cardano node that caused part of the network to start producing an โinvalidโ chain (a temporary fork).
For over an hour, block production slowed down significantly, and on the invalid chain, 846 blocks were reorganized (chain reorg).
According to Charles Hoskinson (founder of Cardano), the culprit was a disgruntled stake pool operator belonging to the โFake Fredโ group/discord (a group known for harshly criticizing Charles and IOHK).
The attack was specifically directed at Charles' personal stake pool, with the aid of #AI.
The attacker first said publicly that it had been โa personal challenge with no malicious intent,โ but Charles insists that it was a premeditated attack and that an FBI investigation is already underway.
Perhaps when there are attacks against Monero, we should report them to the FBI.
I propose creating a Monero security committee, with five bureaucrats in charge, to be voted on by the community ๐
I don't know what the outcome will be, or how or when, but I am convinced of one thing: the transition will begin to take shape in less than three years, and it will be painful for most people.
Signals of #Technocracy #Agenda2030 #AI #Transhumanism
This will happen at some point.
People will validate it. UBI.
I invite you to reflect on this topic.


**I don't write to guard an asset; I write to contribute to a flow.**
And a flow needs openness: #Monero Philosophy
I have published more than 550 articles, each averaging 10 minutes of reading time, in various media outlets, such as:
1. https://n9.cl/pntlse
2. https://n9.cl/jogbu
I am currently publishing my first book, chapter by chapter, regularly (every 15 or 20 days): "Understanding The Information Age. The Sovereign Individual."
https://medium.com/@liberlion/understanding-the-information-age-the-sovereign-individual-index-eea277fe6bef
I have invested many hours of work over the past five years, with my wife as my editor.
I follow the same philosophy as Monero, which has no VC, only the collaboration and willingness of its community for development. I have no sponsors, only the goodwill of my community of readers.
You may or may not be interested in what I write, you may or may not like my writing style, and I may be considered a good writer or a bad one.
I accept all of that.
But there is one thing I stand by and no one can doubt it: I practice what I preach.
**I believe in decentralization, open source, and the freedom and free dissemination of ideas.**
I don't believe in locking ideas and knowledge behind a legal lock. Information lives when it circulates, inspires, and transforms.
That's why I adhere to Creative Commons.
I prefer a framework that encourages sharing over one that starts with prohibition.
Traditional copyright works as a defensive reflex, designed for a world where copying was expensive and slow. Today it's the opposite: copying is natural, and stopping that circulation ends up destroying the potential of what has been created.
Creative Commons allows me to do something simple, almost obvious, but revolutionary in this context: to release my work in a voluntary environment where people can use it, share it, and learn without asking permission from a bureaucrat.
And the analogy is clear: it is the same spirit that sustains free software and the FOSS movement. Open source thrived because thousands of people were able to study, modify, and improve it without restrictions. A text released under CC works the same way; it is cooperative knowledge that grows when others touch it, not when it is immobilized by a lawyer.
I don't write to guard an asset; I write to contribute to a flow. And a flow needs openness.
**The Internet Will Be the New Global Intranet**
The Internet is an open, global network with no single owner.
An intranet is a private, closed network controlled by an organization.
The Internet is anonymous.
An intranet requires a personal identifier to access.
The Internet is like a public street; anyone can use it.
An intranet is like a company's internal hallway; only those with permission can pass through.
On the Internet, a VPN hides your origin and geolocation because you change the exit point.
On an intranet, this makes no sense because the network owner controls everything and can see your permissions and movements. Even if you tunnel, you remain within the highway.
In less than 10 years, the Internet will be a global intranet.
Perhaps the future is not a world without money but a world where money as we know it no longer matters.
What circulates are not bills or bank balances but encrypted values: shared secrets, verifiable proofs, access to the essential. An economy without a center and without a single unit of measure, made of multiple mirrors, where AI is not a spectator but a silent architect.
And where paradox becomes the rule: closed tokens on open ledgers. It is not a collapse, but a mutation. It is not the end of money, but its definitive encryption.
And the challenge will be simple and brutal: learning to live in a world where value is not shown, but proven.
I have published the third chapter of my book: **Understanding The Information Age. The Sovereign Individual. โChapter 3**
https://medium.com/@liberlion/understanding-the-information-age-the-sovereign-individual-chapter-3-c5aa6f2aadf9


Monero in the Agorist Paradise
แดฐแต สธแตแต สทแตโฟแต แตแต หกโฑแตแต โฑโฟ แตสฐแต แตแตหกแตแตโฟ แถแตแตแต แตสณ โฑโฟ แตสฐแต แถ สณแตแต สฒแตโฟแตหกแต?
In the G7 countries, the machinery runs too well. Surveillance capitalism serves as the lubricant that binds corporations, governments, and platforms into a massive state apparatus by default.
With abundant technology and rules that scale frictionlessly, every administrative โupgradeโ reinforces the same logic: more data, more traceability, more #Technocracy.
In that ecosystem, anything that smells like anonymity, decentralization, or economic resistance is regulated first and banned later.
The use and mining of #Monero and other natively private cryptocurrencies go straight onto that list.
The 3rd world, on the other hand, lives in a kind of permanent glitch. Lack of resources, leaky bureaucracies, and states unable to close all circuits. That disorder, often seen as a weakness, becomes the perfect breeding ground for what global powers cannot tolerate: countereconomies.
The Agora evolves
In the 3rd World, parallel markets thrive, informal exchanges multiply, gray areas expand, and economic circuits operate far from the radar. And in that ecosystem, Monero can be used naturally and mined without draconian bans, without absurd energy audits, and without the obsession for total traceability, not because the regulators in these countries do not want to, but because they do not have the technological or economic resources to develop them.
The dilemma becomes personal. Do you want comfort or room to maneuver?
Do you want to live in the golden cage or in the free jungle?
The G7 offers the golden cage, climate-controlled, efficient, and fully visible. The developing world offers the wild jungle, uncomfortable, sure, but fertile for anyone seeking real autonomy.
The task is to find countries that have an adequate balance between the golden cage and the jungle, so that the jungle is not an impossible desert to live in.
In general, several Latin American countries are ideal.
This is not romanticizing poverty. It is a map of incentives.
On one side, societies where every transaction is a data point. On the other hand, territories where an alternative agora can still be built and where you can move without an algorithm deciding your fate.
If you are a #SovereignIdividual, you decide between comfort and more friction in your struggle, or more friction in your standard of living but greater freedom.
#monerist #agorist
In the G7 countries, the machinery runs too well. Surveillance capitalism serves as the lubricant that binds corporations, governments, and platforms into a massive state apparatus by default.
With abundant technology and rules that scale frictionlessly, every administrative โupgradeโ reinforces the same logic: more data, more traceability, more #Technocracy.
In that ecosystem, anything that smells like anonymity, decentralization, or economic resistance is regulated first and banned later.
The use and mining of #Monero and other natively private cryptocurrencies go straight onto that list.
The 3rd world, on the other hand, lives in a kind of permanent glitch. Lack of resources, leaky bureaucracies, and states unable to close all circuits. That disorder, often seen as a weakness, becomes the perfect breeding ground for what global powers cannot tolerate: countereconomies.
The Agora evolves
In the 3rd World, parallel markets thrive, informal exchanges multiply, gray areas expand, and economic circuits operate far from the radar. And in that ecosystem, Monero can be used naturally and mined without draconian bans, without absurd energy audits, and without the obsession for total traceability, not because the regulators in these countries do not want to, but because they do not have the technological or economic resources to develop them.
The dilemma becomes personal. Do you want comfort or room to maneuver?
Do you want to live in the golden cage or in the free jungle?
The G7 offers the golden cage, climate-controlled, efficient, and fully visible. The developing world offers the wild jungle, uncomfortable, sure, but fertile for anyone seeking real autonomy.
The task is to find countries that have an adequate balance between the golden cage and the jungle, so that the jungle is not an impossible desert to live in.
In general, several Latin American countries are ideal.
This is not romanticizing poverty. It is a map of incentives.
On one side, societies where every transaction is a data point. On the other hand, territories where an alternative agora can still be built and where you can move without an algorithm deciding your fate.
If you are a #SovereignIdividual, you decide between comfort and more friction in your struggle, or more friction in your standard of living but greater freedom.
#monerist #agoristThe system surpasses people.
There are no owners of the system, only temporary tenants.
When there is a solid, interconnected, and scalable system, no person is superior to it, even if they participated in its creation or development, because sooner or later, they will end up submerged and subsumed in the system.
When #AI manages the system, this will become even more evident.
**YOU WILL BE TOKENIZED: THE INTERNAUTA**
Itโs not a question. Itโs a certainty.
First, they tokenized money: CBDCs, โregulatedโ stablecoins, and wallets with mandatory KYC.
Then they tokenized your property: your house, your car, your stocksโฆ everything turned into RWAs (Real World Assets) on permissioned blockchains that only banks and governments can validate.
And finally, it will be your turn.
You, the human being, will be the last asset to be tokenized.
Your unique biometric digital identity (DID, SSI, eIDAS 2.0, Worldcoinโcall it whatever you want) will be the non-transferable token that binds you forever to the chain.
A soul-bound token of flesh and blood.
Without that token:
-You wonโt connect to the internet (theyโre already testing it: โhuman-bound accountsโ, โproof-of-personhoodโ).
-You wonโt receive your programmable UBI.
-You wonโt travel.
-You wonโt buy anything.
-You wonโt even be able to post what youโre reading right now.
Theyโll sell you tokenization as โempowermentโ:
โYou will control your own data!โ, โSelf-sovereign identity!โ, โGoodbye passwords!โ
And youโll believe itโฆ until you discover that โsovereigntyโ has a tiny clause written in fine print:
revocable at any time for โnational securityโ, for โdisinformationโ, for low social credit, or simply because your token expired and you didnโt renew your subscription to the system.
You will become THE INTERNAUTA: an identified user, fully traceable, censorable, and, above all, deactivatable with a single click.
Welcome to the world where EVERYTHING is on blockchainโฆ including you.
And when that day comes and you look back, wondering where it all started, remember this post. Because I wonโt be able to tell you anymore: my token will have been burned long ago.
#DID #Technocracy #Transhumanism
Itโs not a question. Itโs a certainty.
First, they tokenized money: CBDCs, โregulatedโ stablecoins, and wallets with mandatory KYC.
Then they tokenized your property: your house, your car, your stocksโฆ everything turned into RWAs (Real World Assets) on permissioned blockchains that only banks and governments can validate.
And finally, it will be your turn.
You, the human being, will be the last asset to be tokenized.
Your unique biometric digital identity (DID, SSI, eIDAS 2.0, Worldcoinโcall it whatever you want) will be the non-transferable token that binds you forever to the chain.
A soul-bound token of flesh and blood.
Without that token:
-You wonโt connect to the internet (theyโre already testing it: โhuman-bound accountsโ, โproof-of-personhoodโ).
-You wonโt receive your programmable UBI.
-You wonโt travel.
-You wonโt buy anything.
-You wonโt even be able to post what youโre reading right now.
Theyโll sell you tokenization as โempowermentโ:
โYou will control your own data!โ, โSelf-sovereign identity!โ, โGoodbye passwords!โ
And youโll believe itโฆ until you discover that โsovereigntyโ has a tiny clause written in fine print:
revocable at any time for โnational securityโ, for โdisinformationโ, for low social credit, or simply because your token expired and you didnโt renew your subscription to the system.
You will become THE INTERNAUTA: an identified user, fully traceable, censorable, and, above all, deactivatable with a single click.
Welcome to the world where EVERYTHING is on blockchainโฆ including you.
And when that day comes and you look back, wondering where it all started, remember this post. Because I wonโt be able to tell you anymore: my token will have been burned long ago.
#DID #Technocracy #Transhumanism