The Next Frontier of Censorship: Killing the VPN Many countries pushing new content-regulation laws are no longer satisfied with controlling what you see, they now want control over how you connect. VPNs began as a simple way to regain privacy and bypass local blocks, but in the current political climate they’ve become a target. Why? Because a VPN breaks the geographic map regulators rely on to filter information. If they can’t locate you, they can’t censor you. This is why governments and platforms are increasingly blacklisting VPN IP ranges, detecting datacenter traffic patterns, and blocking any connection that looks “too anonymous”. Behind the friendly narrative of “user protection” lies a simpler truth: systems built for control cannot tolerate escape routes. The trend is obvious. As regulatory pressure intensifies, more States will try to restrict or outlaw VPN usage to keep their censorship architecture intact. Free access will become the exception, not the rule.

NASDAQ is accelerating its push to launch blockchain-based settlement for stocks The tokenization proposed by BlackRock is on its way. Then it will continue with the ownership of material goods. Guess what is needed to move forward with tokenization? Yes, you. You will be tokenized. Digital identity. Signals of #Technocracy

Are big banks orchestrating MicroStrategy’s collapse to seize Bitcoin on the cheap? December 2025, MSTR’s market cap hovers at 45B while its 650,000 BTC, net of debt, are worth roughly 48B. For the first time, the company trades *below* its net asset value. That alone is historic. The timing makes it stranger. -JPMorgan resurfaces a six-week-old bearish note exactly as BTC corrects. -BlackRock quietly amasses almost 5 percent of MSTR shares. -MSCI’s January 15 decision could eject MSTR from global indices, triggering up to 9B in forced selling, the kind of mechanical liquidation that has nothing to do with fundamentals. If the discount widens and the kill-switch trips, MicroStrategy could be forced to sell Bitcoin, something it has never done. That would dump as much as three percent of total BTC supply into the open market at distressed prices, letting the same banks and ETF issuers scoop up coins and tighten their grip on the new reserve asset. This isn’t a proven conspiracy, but it *is* a power play. Wall Street doesn’t want corporations acting as sovereign gateways to Bitcoin exposure, because sovereign gateways can’t be easily controlled. They want flows locked inside their custodians, their ETFs, their rails. January 2026 is the inflection point. If MSTR holds, Saylor keeps the initiative. If it breaks, the banks get the coins… and rewrite the narrative.

In the current world order of representative democracies, the deep state is run by bankers and the military-industrial complex. The new world order will be dominated by algorithmic democracy—technocracy—where the protagonists of the deep state will be the oligarchs of Silicon Valley and Big Tech in China.

Europol and partners shut down ‘Cryptomixer’ Read my analysis. Three servers were seized in Switzerland, along with the cryptomixer.io domain. The operation resulted in the confiscation of over 12 terabytes of data and more than EUR 25 million worth of the cryptocurrency Bitcoin. After the illegal service was taken over and shut down, law enforcement placed a seizure banner on the website. There is no public clarity on what percentage of the identified funds corresponded to confirmed criminal operations, legitimate money mixed by bona fide “laundered” users, or “clean” funds that simply used the service. This ambiguity complicates assessing the real impact on crime vs. privacy. Bitcoin's traceability will allow funds to be traced. That's why Monero. Your funds are not mixed, not traced, not on a server. They cannot confiscate the blockchain. Your XMR is 100% fungible, private, and yours.

Europol

Europol and partners shut down ‘Cryptomixer’ – EUR 25 million in cryptocurrency seized during the operation | Europol

From 24 to 28 November 2025, Europol supported an action week conducted by law enforcement authorities from Switzerland and Germany in Zurich, Swit...

AI and robotics will bring about major changes in society. I don't know how it will all end, but the transition over the next 5 years will be very painful for most people because the cost-benefit ratio will be negative during the transition. After that, I don't know, but it will be a very different society in a few years. The speed of change is key because there will be no time to adapt.

Your Biometrics Exposed In A Tokenized World When we talk about biometrics, we’re not just talking about fingerprints or facial patterns. We’re talking about the transformation of the body into a password, the self into data. And more gravely, about the irreversible fusion of identity and surveillance. Every time you unlock your phone with your face or authorize a payment with your fingerprint, remember this: You’re signing with your body a pact you might not be able to undo. My article: https://medium.com/@liberlion/your-biometrics-exposed-in-a-tokenized-world-0b4c81f4fe1d

TECHNOCRATIC DICTATORS I am going to suggest an exercise to sharpen your research and critical thinking skills. It is brief, and I believe it will be useful. What usually happens is that the pendulum swings from one extreme to the other before finding a fair balance. People often confuse historical situations and contexts in order to compare them in a simplistic way. I see many posts evoking dictators as the solution to globalism and wokism. In general, dictators tend to take refuge in nationalism and strong divisive rhetoric to gain power through their manipulative leadership, using the classic and old strategy of “divide and conquer.” These dictators achieve their manipulation by using the emotions of the masses who are angry about certain situations that bother many citizens in the country. I am not going to judge whether this or that situation is right or wrong; I am simply going to offer a reflection. Imagine any dictator you want, modern or ancient: Sulla, Julius Caesar, Qin Shi Huang, Dionysius I of Syracuse, Napoleon Bonaparte, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Mao, Pinochet, Kim Il-sung. Now, study the three most relevant actions in history that defined their power, even when that power harmed those who supported them. Now, turn them into a Technocratic Dictator for any of the G7 countries, with their current power and 21st-century technology. You can even play this game yourself first and then choose three different AI LLMs to see what comes out. What would be the obvious consequences of these technocratic dictators FOR THEIR OWN CITIZENS WHO SUPPORTED THEM? #SovereignIndividual

Technocracy is the rule of technology. It is the fusion of politicians and corporations. This type of government requires AI to be implemented. AI has a bottleneck: energy. Do you understand the relationship in this news story? 👇🏻

Google wants to build solar-powered data centers — in space

The tech giant released a paper Tuesday outlining plans to launch its AI chips into low-earth orbit, allowing them to run off solar power.

What's worse than DID? -That DID is biometric And what's worse than DID being biometric? -That everyone must use it to connect to the Internet. Enjoy your shitty day today, because tomorrow could be worse. I'm sorry to disappoint you, but if that's the case, you're living in a "cloud of farts".😂

XMR at -$103.42 or -20% from its ATH. Nothing, sorry to bother you, carry on with what you were doing.

The best tool that sovereign individuals have to challenge centralized government is agorism, because evading taxes defunds politicians and their corrupt system. Having sovereign money is key. Monero is the best money option today. How right this man was 👇🏻 View quoted note →

It's all well and good to fight regulators to try to prevent mass surveillance from being implemented. It must be done, but I'm sorry to say that I believe it will happen sooner or later. #Technocracy is on its way. They need mass surveillance; it is essential. DID is the key. That's why, instead of focusing on fighting “windmills” like Don Quixote, I concentrate on researching and learning about #privacy and evasion tools. It's the same case with #anarchism, which is a difficult ideal to achieve, whereas #agorism is totally viable, practicable both individually and collectively. That is why the counter-economy and counterculture are the path of the sovereign individual. #Linux #Monero #Nostr #SessionMessenger #SovereignIndividual

Decision-making has three stages, identifying options, anticipating their consequences, and weighing their trade-offs. #AI excels at processing vast amounts of information, making it especially effective at describing, summarizing, and synthesizing complex documents and large data sets. Given that, why assume this technology won’t be used to reshape democratic systems?

Stepping away from toxic environments and toxic people is usually the most effective move, when you have the option. Confrontation only drains energy and time, and it rarely changes anything. That distance is also part of the agorist mindset, finding ways to evade oppressive settings and protect your autonomy.

#AI will generate a lot of unemployment. The transition to #Technocracy will be hard for most people. Why do politicians want the DID? One reason is that there will be countless protests. All this in less than 5 years.

Off topic: when a promotion says LAST CHANCE, I automatically dismiss it, because there will be a new one, and with better conditions or price.

THE RESISTANCE WILL BE ENCRYPTED

2030: Want internet? Show your ID. Regulators are gunning for total control using security as the excuse. The conclusion is stark: the Dark Web will cease to be a criminal den and become the sole refuge of the "old" free internet. Technically, you’ll be able to get in using advanced camouflage, but watch out: in a world of whitelists, the problem isn’t connecting, it’s avoiding being flagged for "suspicious behavior." Anonymity will be the true revolutionary act.

The level of Orwellian surveillance that will exist under Technocracy in the G7 countries will be such that these countries will restrict emigration from their countries to their citizens. The third world will be an agorist paradise, not because there is no technocracy and surveillance, but because the resources of weaker states make controls more permeable.