Poker with bitcoiners is a vibe

Everyone declaring victory over spam last month eating crow

Article Update: "Satoshis Bitcoin v0.0 Had 1.99 Billion Bitcoin, Not 21 Million" https://medium.com/@Fiach_dubh/1-99-billion-bitcoin-not-21-million-fad9f5550659 After reviewing a few more articles on this topic and the Bitcoin Whitepaper conversation on the cryptography mailing list some more interesting details have merged. Satoshi's last email on the cryptography mailing list, where he publicly says to James Donald, "I sent you the main files". These files were the Bitcoin source code for the first Bitcoin client software. Also, we can see from the Hal Finney private email that the subject heading reads "Re: Bitcoin source files attached" with James, Hal and Ray Dillinger cc'd. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/11/26/previously-unpublished-emails-of-satoshi-nakamoto-present-a-new-puzzle/ Therefore, The private Hal email confirms Satoshi likely sent the Bitcoin source code files to not just Ray Dillinger, but James A Donald and Hal Finney too on November 16th, 2008. Satoshi had apparently been working on this code for more then a year and a half. This likely means Satoshi began working on Bitcoin code in earnest around the middle of 2007.

Bitcoin Insider

Satoshi’s Pre-Release Bitcoin Code Contains Fascinating Findings

Also, according to the above Bitcoin Insider article "The source (v0.0) also has a discarded genesis block in the code which has a completely different hash. Assuming the hash was the first genesis test block, it was produced on Sept. 10, 2008." This may be an effective timestamp for the date of this v0.0 source code. This implies Satoshi gave these three gentleman an older "version 1" copy of Bitcoin, and not an updated version 2, which could have been v0.1. (In one email Satoshi describes a new Bitcoin feature as a "version 2" issue). Speculation on why Satoshi didn't give these three people the full version 2 details: Well, James A. Donald made it clear in one of his cryptography mailing list emails that he wanted to launch his own Bitcoin version eventually. So maybe Satoshi didn't feel like sharing everything with someone who may front run him to the finish line? originally posted at

Stacker News

Article Update: "Satoshis Bitcoin v0.0 Had 1.99 Billion Bitcoin, Not 21 Million" \ stacker news

After reviewing a few more articles on this topic and the Bitcoin Whitepaper conversation on the cryptography mailing list some more interesting de...

Mediocrity isn’t just easy. It’s boring. Stay weird, you’ll get somewhere fun.

Here's an interesting observation that the "satoshi-was-an-academic" theory suffers from: The whitepaper used neither MLA or APA citation formatting, (commonly used university standards). But rather an informal technical documentation style of citing sources. So neither a university student either mayhaps, since this is a 101 university lesson everyone learns.

It's pretty clear the HBO Documentary Author is full of 💩 Peter Todd is not Satoshi Nakamoto.

Satoshi Nakamoto is Not Peter Todd | But Cullen Hoback is a Muckraker originally posted at

Stacker News

Satoshi Nakamoto is Not Peter Todd | But Cullen Hoback is a Muckraker \ stacker news

@BITC0IN stacked 0 sats posting https://youtu.be/pmL-sgVqjFs

Save your sats and pirate the HBO documentary. It’s hilariously bad.

BlackRock worried about people with Digital #Bitcoin Wealth not using Financial Advisors. The Horror!

Horse racing with Bitcoiners is fun

Every so often I get offers to sell out from shitcoin exchanges and it's hilarious what they resort to when they're ignored.

Bitcoin is Time

If Blackrock is about to rug pull coinbase as a custodian in favour of BNY Mellon, maybe it’s a good idea for you MSTR maxis to sell your shares before Saylor is trapped.

Self custody is the entire point and only reason Bitcoin can work. It's why it has a price in the first place. If you don't get that, you're as regarded as saylor.

Kingdom of Bhutan Fourth Largest Government Bitcoin Holder With Green Bitcoin Mining

art