Paranoia is as unhelpful as complacency. Both delay taking the right course of action.

#meme #FTX #MtGox #Celcius #Coldcard

Growing up on a farm taught me how easily a large herd can be controlled. One person can move hundreds of animals with surprisingly little force. Once a few begin moving in the intended direction, most follow. The real effort is spent on the handful that resist, break away and encourage others to turn. They are chased down, subdued and, if necessary, separated and isolated. It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the possibility that Bitcoin maximalism has always served a similar function. Bitcoin began as a challenge to systems built on monetary control, permission and unequal access. It offered the possibility of moving society toward greater freedom, fairness and human dignity. Yet many of the people who asserted themselves as leaders of the movement have replaced those broad principles with a rigid definition of ideological purity. Instead of centring the movement on the values that sound money can promote, they rally people around slogans, loyalty tests and exclusivity. The result is an in-group and out-group culture in which questioning preferred technologies, personalities or narratives is treated as betrayal. That is not intellectual confidence. It is social control. Bitcoin will always be under attack. The best defence is not conformity, but informed users with genuine choice. People must be free to compare technologies, question incentives, test claims and support alternatives without being marginalised for stepping outside an approved narrative. That is one reason Nostr matters. Open communication infrastructure can make it harder for institutions, platforms or influential personalities to control what people see and who is allowed to speak. But it is sobering to think that Nostr has been promoted largely by many of the same influencers who have worked to dominate the Bitcoin narrative. That does not mean they are all bad actors, and I am not accusing any particular person of deliberate sabotage. The problem is structural. Once a developer, company or influencer becomes dependent on funding, sponsorship or institutional support, they are no longer completely free. Even without explicit instructions, dependence shapes incentives. It affects what gets built, what gets criticised, what gets ignored and which compromises are considered acceptable. That gives independent hobbyist developers something many professional influencers and developers do not possess: freedom. They may have less money, less polish and less visibility, but they can pursue ideas on merit rather than on whether those ideas satisfy sponsors, investors or established factions. They can build tools that threaten existing interests precisely because their livelihood does not depend on pleasing them. So do not be discouraged when your work is overlooked while inferior competitors are heavily promoted. Do not assume that visibility proves quality or that funding proves legitimacy. Being ignored may simply mean you are building something that cannot be easily controlled. That is part of the struggle. Keep building.

Is there a template and guide for creating paper multisig wallets from coin toss or dice?

Sorry, this is outdated View quoted note →