Based!

This is the difference. Core devs turned shitcoiners. View quoted note → View quoted note →

Absolute nonsense and pathetic take. Core devs deliberately allowed inscriptions spam. They are now using that as excuse that "spam can't be reduced" or that "spam already exists on Bitcoin because of inscription spam". That is dishonest and an internal attack on Bitcoin. Core devs deliberately allow spam and then defend it like shitcoiners. They also maliciously changed the definition of datacarriersize. Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.

GitHub

datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying by luke-jr · Pull Request #28408 · bitcoin/bitcoin

Updates -datacarriersize to be effective with newer datacarrying styles.

GitHub

Witness scripts being abused to bypass datacarriersize limit (CVE-2023-50428) · Issue #29187 · bitcoin/bitcoin

The datacarriersize policy option is meant to limit the size of extra data allowed in transactions for relaying and mining. Since the end of 2022, ...

View quoted note →