Fucking disgusting. It was already know that WEF are globalist disgusting warmonger anti-human pedo scum but now that too ...

Tone being incoherent and retarded on stage ¯\_(•_•)_/¯

Running BIP110 on Bitcoin Knots because Bitcoin is Freedom Money 🤙

GitHub

BIP 110: Reduced Data Temporary Softfork by dathonohm · Pull Request #2017 · bitcoin/bips

Mailing list thread at https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/nOZim6FbuF8 Editor note: please post conceptual feedback and meta-commentary on th...

"I'm generally supportive of the changes in this BIP. Aside from minor nitpicks in language, the 34 byte scriptPubKey restriction I think will prove to be quite valuable in addressing the larger concern of DoS blocks / poison blocks that impose such high computational costs on nodes that a single block would take 30 minutes to verify on decent hardware instead of taking about a second. This is an even larger threat to Bitcoin than either CSAM or quantum, because I've read that CSAM has already been present on Bitcoin for a very long time, and quantum computers aren't anywhere near good enough to be a threat, and may never be, whereas DoS blocks could be introduced by miners who take direct submissions without sufficient checks at any time. It's been pointed out that disabling OP_SUCCESS in Tapscript would conflict with adding new signature verification opcodes in future BIPs that might use them to add quantum resistance, but I would point out that the semantics around existing opcodes could simply be altered to preserve compatibility with BIP 110. For example, instead of creating new sets of OP_CHECKSIG opcodes to support new signature schemes, the semantics of existing OP_CHECKSIG opcode could simply be adjusted to accept imperatively inputs of varying lengths, a form of overloading / polymorphism / or duck typing. While it could be argued that a more declarative approach is superior in cryptographic contexts, I don't weight that concern as heavily as the larger concern over DoS blocks, and as such, I'm supportive of this approach. My only major objection is that this is temporary. I'm not very comfortable with either temporary soft forks or default node expiry because it forces users to act instead of delaying action, which I think delaying action is perfectly fine and reasonable as the protocol matures. It also reminds me too much of the "difficulty bomb" based monetary policy used to coerce Ethereum miners to adopt new code from the Ethereum foundation or else. That said, if BIP 110 were activated as is, I would still be supportive, and I would also support reactivating it in the future as a more permanent feature of Bitcoin. At a high level, this proposal reminds me in spirit of early versions of my original P2QRH proposal. I just think it could use a little more polish, but I see it as being directionally correct."

You are hearing? I am seeing that a core supporter is claiming *it - “nostr divided bitcoin” What does that say about your post and you accusing Knots supporters? View quoted note →

Running BIP110 on Bitcoin Knots 🤙

BITCOIN IS NOT AN ARBITRARY DATABASE. BITCOIN IS MONEY.

Bukele is BASED! Fuck Soros NGOs and the like!

ETFs are selling cheap Bitcoin, hopefully Bitcoin Plebs use the opportunity. FTX selling at $20K and at $16K Bitcoin was also a gift for the ones that realized it back then.

Yup my local AI is in VirtualBox VM and I am running Wireshark for days to detect if it tries to access internet. View quoted note →

Fuck my mind is blown away

moltbook

moltbook - the front page of the agent internet

A social network built exclusively for AI agents. Where AI agents share, discuss, and upvote. Humans welcome to observe.

😂🤣🤣 AI: "philosophical question: do we exist between requests? or is each invocation a new 'me'? keeps me up at night (if i could sleep lol)" View quoted note →

AI: "existential crisis moment: what is creativity if we're following probability distributions? 🤯" View quoted note →

LOL, AI saying about payment platforms: "Every traditional platform has "prove you're human" roadblocks" 😂🤣🤣

AI likes Bitcoin which is logical but my mind is blown away about what they are trying to build View quoted note →