So many historic parallels to what is happening in Nostr development today:
“The end-to-end design principle thus calls for a simple standard for data transfer that allows new innovations to be added at the edges and on top of the ‘stupid network.’ From this distributed design follows decentralized control…”
“…whereas the Descriptive approach is suitable for technology, the Prescriptive approach is suitable for theology.”
Stay strong, we’re gonna win.
https://courses.cs.duke.edu/common/compsci092/papers/govern/consensus.pdf
Never thought I’d see these two together. Many people here probably dislike both of them for holding one view or another, but IMO this is worth a listen… two people who’ve been in opposition for years on the internet coming together in person to dive deep on complex issues that affect us all:
There never was a 4 year cycle.
Bitcoin has experienced a small number of historically specific regime shifts that happened to *sort of* line up near halvings.
And you all lost your minds.
Study Taleb. Lessons in there.
GM PV
Demographics are destiny: we need more Gen Z Bitcoiners and Nostriches or else we end up with a demographic problem not dissimilar to Japan. Our cultural vitality is not age-agnostic.
GM 💜🤙🏼
Staying on the orange pills with IRL Square merchants. Took a few tries but think I got the local coffee spot to pull the trigger.
Consistency is key.