Argument from authority ceases to work where there is no trust of that authority.
jimmysong
jimmy@jimmysong.org
npub10vlh...sp42
Bitcoin Expert
Open-Source Coder
Follow me to learn #BTC
Author of 5 Bitcoin books
PGP: DE9A 9438 F8B0 89DD AD17 82A3 99D0 75B8 9511 8988
Exposure to Bitcoin isn't Bitcoin.
We're not going into a bull market until this lesson is learned.
Sorry, I don't make the rules.
The deeper the belief, the longer you stay engaged.
Good thing the Bitcoin rabbit hole is deep.
Ultimately, the circular economy will emerge to get around fiat chokepoints.
People secretly like centralization because it gives them someone to blame if things go wrong. Girardian scapegoats are preferred to taking responsibility.
Free issue for the first Monday of the month!
America's Century of Humiliation, Europe's Anti-A/C Death Toll, Remigration Taxonomy, Sci-Fi as Real Literature, Why China Beat India, Overconfidence, Taproot Hidden Paths Used by Only 1.51%, BIP110 Readiness Satire, Bitcoin's First Miner Forensics, Peptide Industry Goes Lightning, Voltage Kills Self-Serve, Cerberus Ark-Bitcoin Atomic Swaps, BIP110 Six-Community Taxonomy, Bitcoin Is Not Freedom?, Block Size War Reflections and more!
#Bitcoin Tech Talk #508

Bitcoin Tech Talk #508
Interesting Stuff
I tell founders that preparing for success is much harder than preparing for failure, because most people think that success will be easy. It isn't. The more resources you have, the more choices you have to make and the more such choices matter. And those choices have to be made wisely.
An abundant future is at hand. The question is, are you prepared for it?
If you're doing drugs, you're not valuing your mind and body enough.
If you're scamming people, you're not valuing your soul enough.
Loyalty is admirable. But it is possible to overindex on it.
I suspect a lot of people choose sides not because they believe the side to be true, but because they want to win and increase their status.
I'd hate to say it but a lot of people in Bitcoin still have the fiat mentality of "if enough people believe something, then it'll become true"
Reality doesn't care about majority preference.
I wrote on why the neutral position on BIP110 is the right one:


On Overconfidence
Zap this post for 2000 sats and get the full newsletter straight to your Nostr DM!
For free subscribers: Kennedy and Israel, Red vs Blue Family Models, Childhood Freedom, Why Women Aren't Converting, Alzheimer's and Community and more!
For paid subscribers: Bitcoin Privacy State of the Union, BIP110 Fork Simulator, Brink's Bedrock Deterministic Fuzzer, LDK Async Payments, ZapBox $3 Lightning Hardware, Bitcoin Karoo South Africa, Blockstream Mining Note Fallout, Dilution as a Service, Assange Film Funded via Bitcoin and more!
#Bitcoin Tech Talk #507


Bitcoin Tech Talk #507
Interesting Stuff

You can just say things.
Understanding intentions is usually pretty straightforward. Understanding consequences, that requires serious wisdom.
We don't do enough reflection about the consequences of the choices we've made.
Sw conflict in a community is healthy
Still confused by how certain people are about the success or failure of BIP110. For me, it's anything but settled.
The real virtue of decentralized systems is that it's very hard to compel others to do anything.
Zap this post for 2000 sats and get the full newsletter straight to your Nostr DM!
For free subscribers: Autonomous Cars, Quebec Independence, Failed Interwar Democracies, Spencer Pratt's LA Bombshells, Knockrup.com Dystopia and more!
For paid subscribers: Joinstr on Floresta, P2WOTS Quantum Soft Fork Proposal, Accountable AI Computing, LND Zero-Timestamp Crash Bug, The Merge (Core Governance Exposé), Satoshi's Full Timeline, Sponsored Education Problem and more!
#Bitcoin Tech Talk #506


Bitcoin Tech Talk #506
Interesting Stuff
