muted buzzbot to revitalize the trending feeds 👌👌

Sunday Night Macro, tonight our 30-year fixed mortgage average. super sticky up near 7%. Trump says “too late” Powell needs to cut but the market says he won’t. Who (or what) breaks first? My take: Tariff uncertainty breaks to the upside, markets resolve higher, yields lower. The Fed will be sitting tight until prompted by summer unemployment and inflation data.

Good afternoon y’all, Monero will never be anything more than a footnote to Bitcoin. Never. Have a great day!

Now is a great time to review this project from @Lyn Alden and others (sorry I’m not aware of npubs for Ren Crypto Fish or Steve Lee). How does Bitcoin consensus actually work? Important notes for today’s discussion: - protocol developers do not have unilateral leverage over consensus because it is the economic nodes who choose which code to run

GitHub

GitHub - bitcoin-cap/bcap: Repo for Analyzing Bitcoin Consensus: Risks in Protocol Upgrades

Repo for Analyzing Bitcoin Consensus: Risks in Protocol Upgrades - bitcoin-cap/bcap

h/t @notgrubles on twitter

in other news that I have just seen.. WoS epic comeback 🇺🇸

only in bitcoin. 33% of us engaged in a seemingly endless civil war 33% shitposting 33% MOON SOON DID U GET YOUR BAG ANON , MSTR IBIT XXI MARA NEXT!! OMG SAYLOR BOUGHT AGAIN!! 1% fucking hates all of the rest of us

I know I said we should shut up but this is getting worse by the day. Bitcoin Core Cocksuckers are just posting photos of long-form text that the Core devs have written regarding this issue. They think we can’t read or are unwilling to. We’ve stated maybe 1636375 times that this is a cultural issue and not technical and their response is increasingly to shut down the conversation, call us trolls, throw jargon, technobabble, credentials in our face. Tell us that we just don’t understand the change and are harming ourselves. We understand. We disagree. We have a say in the code we run. The developers have a say in the CULTURE they build around their implementation and how it handles updates, communications, reactions to new people and ideas including new players such as Citrea. They have decided to steer that culture in the direction of preference, in the direction of intervention, in the direction of technicalities and acceptance of what is possible rather than what is right. It is not possible to stop the spam they say, so the technically sound solution is to open the right door for the spammers. This is WRONG. So Core, argue why it should be RIGHT, not why it “technically is the best solution!” Otherwise implementations will continue to fragment and eventually this is all going to come to a head, which is bad for all of us. Hopefully, Core will start to listen and engage with the truth of the matter at hand. Long Live Bitcoin