Algunos tienen un ego insaciable... que casinos por favar...
Unfollowed
IrrelevantBoB
irrelevantbob@plebchain.club
npub104j2...eav8
Cypherpunky
KISS
Keep It Simple Stupid
₿
I DON'T GIVE A SHIT IF TWATTER IS DOWN
Preparando la salsa y la masa mmmm
😋😋
#BitcoinPizzaDay


Puedes ignorar el Bitcoin pero no puedes evitar las consecuencias de ignorarlo.
@⚡️2FakTor⚡️ Compañero, seria genial que añadieses como extra Bitcoin Knots en tus fantásticas guias.
Bob Burnett
For those who don’t know me, I run a mining company called Barefoot Mining– not the biggest mining company but not the smallest either. Whether I would be considered major or not can be judged by others.
That said, I suggest being very careful about projecting the current behavior of major miners as the norm or representative of the future. We are extremely early in the development of the mining industry and there is a high likelihood that over the next few years that there will a dramatic change in the list of major miners – and there very well may be changes in the philosophies and priorities of these miners as well.
I spent most of career in the personal computer industry going back to ’86 (most notably as the CTO of Gateway) and I learned many things from my experience. One important thing was that the pace with which companies could rise to or fall from prominence was jaw-dropping. Assuming that “major miners” was meant to mean a group that largely is comprised of pubcos, none of the major players in the mining industry have been doing it for long - with most going public very recently (’22 and ’23). They but pups as companies and we’ve already seen a huge flameout or two. The next three to five years will likely result in a few more flameouts and some large new entrants that may approach mining from a completely different perspective. A second learning I will share from my PC development days was that predicting usages and user behavior is next to impossible. The safest and most accommodating path is to give as much user optionality/configurability as possible. My high-level recommendation is to work on paths that give users more choice not less. This is applies to OP_RETURN but, even more importantly, I think it is the best design direction in general.
To offer what may be a new lens in which to view miners, I’ll share a bit of my philosophy and vision for my company. I view Barefoot as being in the business of block production and I desire the maximum amount of flexibility/choice in making blocks. My strategy to develop and monetize block space goes beyond just fighting for a piece of the block reward. I believe that over time many miners will reach the same conclusion that this is the best path to differentiation. If not, the miners become just hashers, and I believe that is a very dangerous path for Bitcoin.
Finally, I don’t see any compelling reason for a change in OP_RETURN policy or configurability. I speak to a lot of other miners as well and I don’t know of one a single one that feels any change is beneficial to them now.
Que GM ni que BM!!!
Desead los BUENOS DÍAS como Satoshi manda.
Buenos días!
Hora de unos verdes... no esa yerba noo de la que no se fuma ;)


Sé sincero... resulta que de oídas llegaste al tema de op_return y como el tema es complejo y profundo no le vas a dedicar el tiempo necesario para comprenderlo.
Tampoco estuviste en las guerras del tamaño de bloque y ni sabes la importancia de que sea sencillo correr un nodo.
No vas a leer los argumentos de uno y otro lado, no....vas a escuchar el pod de luna y te vas a creer informado y vas defender esa posición como si fuese tan obvia y descartar el resto, incluso con los argumentos mas estúpidos tipo sensuuuura.
@lunaticoin estaría bien el debate y no los programas tipo tv donde te traen unos expertos y todos están de acuerdo y nos dicen cual es la verdad ™