Trump promised to release the JFK assassination files. But upon reviewing them himself, he reneged on the promise, and instead said releasing them unredacted could pose irreversible harm to the nation's national security.
It's clear to everyone that the Commission Report had so many holes in it, that no one believes it anymore.
We know many influential groups were very upset with JFK: Israel, organized crime, the Rothschild's, big oil, etc. We even have footage of the driver turning and shooting over his shoulder at Kennedy.
Charlie Kirk's recent "assassination", with its Freemason fingerprints all over, and with the footage clearly AI altered, reminds us that these false events have been used against the public for a long time.
Below is a new angle of what went down that JFK day. It ties together a lot of odd things, like the two frames removed from the footage of his "shooting". And why the footage changed half-way through from outdoor film to indoor film. It also explains what Jackie was doing--and once you've seen it, you can't stop unseeing it. It explains what happened to JFK's body afterward. Also, did you know that, later, they dug up JFK's grave in the middle of the night w/o telling anyone first and "moved it"? You'll understand why after this. It also explains the odd things that happened to Lee Harvey Oswald and his remains, too.
Let me say here that I find myself agreeing with the event as presented below, however, I don't agree with the theory given afterward as to WHY they chose to do this JFK "assassination" event. The guy here posses HIS theory, but I don't agree with it. I do, however, find myself agreeing with the rest.
So, if you decide this is interesting to check out--enjoy:
Odysee
John F Kennedy - JFK X - Solving the Crime of the Century - Jay Weidner
Or, the Hoax of the Century. Who received the Zapruder film at Time Life? CD Jackson - the guy who arranged the house of horrors shown to Eisenhowe...
ps. Feel free to skim over quite a bit of the initial parts that cover stuff you already know; there's only one or two interesting points raised there, which can be missed if you want to instead get right to it.
src: 
