Loli 
user
npub1srs9...gkdt
Loli 
Loli 
Post bullshit
Onwards
Deleting anything always prevents growth
Integration is the key
Loli 
Loli 
Loli 
Loli 
Loli 
Loli 
Amethyst view counts lie
Ux:
Categorize follows:
Follows a
Follows b
Etc
This gives More control on personal feed
Test222
@npub173sw...p2qj
Unfortunately hodlers financial gain and network security are in conflict.
Your funny equation about fixed max supply is the doom of the protocol.
Fixed total supply was introduced to bootstrap the protocol. It needed to have promise of combating fiat system inflation.
The inconvinient truth is that pow blockchain need to allocate reasonable resources to protect its network. With fixed blockspace, it cannot come from tx fees, that is simply not possible.
Only bitcoin network that can survive next 100 years is not the one with 21 000 000 max supply.
Halvings do not necessarily reduce difficulty used to protect the network, if we can assume price growth by time.
But it does reduce the relative amount of resources used to keep the network secure.
In the end, pow networks are secured by financial incentives.
What is the relative amount of capital needed to protect blockchain to avoid malicious attack?
We need to realize the fact that any pow network can be attacked by wealthy individual or organisaation.
Reducing mining rewards make this attack cheaper.
Buy Bitcoin cash and receive $10 free.
Stop paying high fees. Switch to bch.
First they celebrate halving of miner fees
Then they celebrate low tx fees
thisisfine.webp