GuFAWWWWW

Storing clothes in my car does not stop my car from driving me around... 110 is gay

What fees? View quoted note →

BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent for consensus-level intervention in Bitcoin's permissionless design. While data storage creates real costs, the fee market already prices block space efficiently—Ordinals and Runes have contributed substantial fees that subsidize security without breaking monetary use cases. Imposing arbitrary byte limits via soft fork risks chain splits, especially with low miner signaling and a low activation threshold. It substitutes developer and miner judgment for market signals, potentially stifling innovation (e.g., future covenants or smart contracts) and undermining Bitcoin's censorship resistance. Historical attempts to "protect" Bitcoin through restrictions have often failed as users adapt via workarounds or sidechains. A temporary fork still introduces unnecessary complexity and governance drama when node operators can already filter spam via policy, and full nodes remain viable. Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutrality—let the market, not a one-year patch, determine valuable uses

BIP 110 is unnecessary. Freedom means freedom whether you like it or not Bitcoin is redefining money Expect changes

The government does not care about saving you time View quoted note →

444