The convenience of microchipping people comes with a hidden cost, including tracking, manipulation, censorship, social credit systems, and control. The fact that it is being offered for free with incentives to encourage mindless and unreflective people to make the implant leap is a clear indication of where things are headed. It is important to resist this authoritarianism disguised as convenience if you value human rights and democracy. Behind the veil of convenience lurks tyranny and totalitarianism.

A newspaper headline from 1953 predicts the future.

We must be wary of paths promoted by corporate giants with deeply vested interests, as they will lead to control over food resources, resulting in immense power and influence over people's decision-making. Henry A. Kissinger famously said: "If you control the food, you control a nation. If you control the energy, you control a region. If you control the money, you control the world." Expanding the industrialization of food production is an attractive solution to reduce methane emissions from cows. Still, it is crucial to consider the potential consequences of such pathways before making any decisions. The use of genetically engineered feed, the use of methane digesters to capture and convert methane into electricity, and the use of vaccinations and other drugs to limit methane output are just a few of the corporate industrial solutions that are being marketed. Companies like Monsanto have promoted genetically modified feed use and faced criticism for their impact on the environment, biodiversity, and human health. Similarly, companies like Tyson Foods have embraced precision agriculture techniques like precision grazing and feed management, which have been criticized for their potential negative impacts on animal welfare and the environment. These examples illustrate that corporate control over food resources can have far-reaching negative consequences. Now consider patents and control of these solutions and the implications this could have on access to food resources. In keeping with this line of reasoning, it is worth noting that the consolidation of power and control over food resources can have far-reaching consequences. In some cases, it can lead to monopolies in the food industry, resulting in increased prices and decreased availability of certain types of food. This can negatively impact vulnerable populations, such as low-income families, who may already struggle to access healthy and nutritious food. Meanwhile, using genetically modified feed and other industrial solutions has had unintended consequences on the environment and human health. The long-term effects of these approaches still need to be fully understood, and there is a risk that they could negatively impact biodiversity and soil health, among other things. In addition, the use of pharmaceuticals to reduce methane production could have implications for food safety and the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Given these potential consequences, we must approach the issue of food production and sustainability with caution. It is important to consider the long-term impacts of different approaches before making decisions that could have far-reaching consequences. This means taking a holistic approach to food production that considers not just the immediate benefits of industrial solutions but also the potential risks and long-term implications for both people and the planet. It is crucial to clarify that while I acknowledge the value of scientific developments in solving issues related to food production, I do not discount the potential for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to improve food security internationally. The use of ostensibly simple scientific remedies, however, that may have unforeseen negative effects, must also be considered. The recent pandemic response has shown us that even the most well-intentioned solutions can have unforeseen consequences. Therefore, I urge caution and careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits before making decisions that could have far-reaching implications for both people and the planet.

If you save your money in dollars, the value of that money will gradually decrease over time due to inflation, which means that you will need more dollars to purchase the same amount of goods and services. On the other hand, if you save your money in Bitcoin, the value of that money will increase over time due to its deflationary nature and limited supply. As a result, if you want to purchase real estate in the future, you will need to save more dollars to afford it than you would if you were saving in Bitcoin. This is because the increase in the price of real estate is likely to outpace the increase in the purchasing power of the US Dollar. But, if you save in Bitcoin, the price of real estate will become cheaper over time in terms of its Bitcoin-denominated price, as the increase in the purchasing power of Bitcoin is likely to outpace the increase in the price of real estate. This means that you will be able to purchase more real estate if you choose to with the same amount of Bitcoin in the future than you would be able to with the same amount of US Dollars. At this point, this is an established fact with historical data where Real estate becomes perpetually more expensive when saving in Dollars and perpetually cheaper when saving in BTC. Chart from twitter

Religion has historically been a source of conflict and division between different groups, and has often been used to justify acts of violence and oppression. Many religious beliefs are based on unproven assumptions and dogma, and are used everyday to justify discriminatory practices and marginalize people. By contrast, a post-religious world would be characterized by a greater emphasis on reason, evidence, and critical thinking. Without the influence of dogmatic religious beliefs, individuals and societies would be more likely to adopt evidence-based approaches to understanding the world and making decisions. This will lead to more equitable and just societies, as decisions would be based on objective criteria rather than arbitrary religious beliefs, or extrapolations or extractions of those beliefs. A post-religious world will also be more tolerant and accepting of diversity. Religious beliefs often promote the idea of one true faith, and often leads to discrimination and intolerance towards those who hold different beliefs. In a post-religious world, individuals would be free to explore and express their own beliefs without fear of persecution or discrimination. And most importantly, a post-religious world would allow for greater scientific and technological progress. Many religious beliefs are based on supernatural or mystical explanations for natural phenomena, which continues to inhibit scientific inquiry and progress. Without the influence of religious beliefs, individuals and societies would be more likely to embrace scientific and technological advancements, leading to a better understanding of the world and improved quality of life. The counterarguments for religion argue that religion provides a sense of comfort and meaning for many individuals, and that removing it from society could lead to increased levels of despair and nihilism. Others have argugued that religion provides a valuable moral framework, and that a post-religious world could lead to a breakdown in social cohesion and morality. However, this too is wrong, as morality is not dependent on religion; indeed, a post-religious world will lead to a more moral society, as moral decisions are based on a more rational understanding of the world. The counterarguments for religion are based on flawed premises and are thus invalid. Humanist rebuttals to the counterarguments for religion in my opinion are: 1. Comfort and meaning can be found through secular means: While religion may provide comfort and meaning for some individuals, it is not the only source of these things. Many people find comfort and meaning through human connections, personal passions, and other secular pursuits. 2. Nihilism is not inevitable without religion: It is a common misconception that without religion, individuals will inevitably fall into despair and nihilism. However, many individuals who do not believe in a god or subscribe to a particular religion still find purpose and meaning in life. 3. Moral frameworks can exist without religion: A post-religious world does not necessarily mean a breakdown in social cohesion and morality. Humanist ethics and values, for example, prioritize the well-being of individuals and promote values such as empathy, compassion, and fairness. 4. Religion continues to be a source of division and conflict: While religion can provide a sense of community and shared values for some individuals, it is also a source of division and conflict between different groups. Humanism, on the other hand, seeks to promote inclusivity and respect for all individuals, regardless of their beliefs. We do not need comforting lies and ignorant understandings of reality; rather, we should strive to understand the world through evidence-based scientific inquiry. Belief systems, creation stories, and other non-scientific explanations of the world and universe are not necessary for a meaningful life, and is objectively harmful when taken too seriously. Evolution is a well-supported scientific understanding of reality that explains the origins of the universe and the development of life on Earth. We should strive to understand the world through scientific evidence, rather than relying on comforting lies and ignorant understandings of reality. Whether or not one believes in the idea of a post-religious world, we must work towards that goal and engage in discussions and debates about the role of religion in society, in order to promote greater understanding and tolerance between individuals and groups. Dialogue leads to introspection, introspection leads to change.

The real "Climate Solutions Denialists" are those who reject the idea that nuclear energy can be a viable part of the solution to climate change. This includes many environmentalists, who are often labeled as "anti-nuclear Greens". Their argument that nuclear energy is too dangerous, too expensive, and too difficult to manage, and that somehow intermittent renewable energy sources such as solar and wind should be the only focus. But countless scientists and energy experts believe that nuclear energy is the vital missing link in reducing emission and human climate adaptation.

As the world of work evolves at an unprecedented pace, the emergence of artificial intelligence and automation is disrupting various industries and job markets. To thrive in this new era, it is imperative to stay ahead of the curve by adapting to the changing landscape. AI is at the forefront of this transformation, as it can analyze data and predict future trends, providing valuable insights into what skills will be in demand. Organizations and individuals who pay attention to these predictions and adapt accordingly can position themselves for success. To prepare for the jobs of the future, individuals must focus on developing skills that are relevant in an AI-driven world, such as data science, machine learning, and natural language processing. At the same time, they must also work on enhancing skills that are less easily automated, such as creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence. This will ensure that they are well-equipped to face the challenges of an ever-changing job market. To stay relevant and ahead of the curve, we must look to the future and anticipate where the job market is headed. One way to do this is by leveraging the power of AI, which can provide valuable insights into what skills will be most in demand. By paying attention to these predictions and adapting accordingly, individuals and organizations can position themselves for success in an ever-changing landscape. The bottom line is that the world of work is changing, and those who are able to adapt and stay ahead of the curve will be the most successful. By leveraging the power of AI and focusing on developing relevant skills, we can all position ourselves to thrive in this new era. As Wayne Gretzky once said, "I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been." This quote highlights the importance of strategic thinking and anticipating future trends, rather than simply reacting to what is happening in the present. By adopting this mindset and staying ahead of the curve, we can position ourselves for success in an ever-changing world.

This Bitcoin bull market cycle, people around the globe will come to realize that Bitcoin is here to stay. After over a decade of existence and major companies integrating Bitcoin payments, there is no turning back from this revolutionary technology. This cycle will also bring the painful realization that rampant inflation is not a temporary issue, but a perpetual problem inherent in fiat currencies. As governments continue to print money to fund debt and deficits, the purchasing power of currencies will continue to decline. Bitcoin's fixed supply provides an escape from this cycle of currency debasement. 2023 will be the year that Bitcoin transitions from a niche technology to a mainstream global payments network. More businesses will choose to hold Bitcoin in their treasury reserves as a hedge against inflation and unstable currencies. Major companies that have already adopted Bitcoin payments will expand their offerings, and new companies will launch with Bitcoin integration at their core. This cycle will witness the awakening of banks and financial institutions to Bitcoin‘s revolutionary technology. They will realize that this innovation threatens to displace the traditional functions they serve. Some will resist and lag, but others will embrace Bitcoin and work to build new products and services based on this scarce digital asset. Ultimately, this year and cycle will teach the world that Bitcoin is the only solution to shattered trust in institutions, reckless government spending, and fragile economic policies. Bitcoin's security, scarcity, and borderless nature make it superior to government interventions and a crashing global monetary system. As the world continues to change in tumultuous ways, Bitcoin will shine as a steady anchor of sound money. The future remains unwritten, but this cycle will prove catalytic in ushering in a new monetary order built on Bitcoin. Study #Bitcoin.

Any idea with sufficient incentives and resources will come up with science-sounding names, themes, narratives, and data that reinforces those beliefs. Over time, with resources enabling widespread idea propagation, selection pressure will increase and the idea will gain momentum. This is how "fiat science" can misrepresent itself as actual science. In an evolving universe, this is unavoidable. Let's unpack what I mean by that: • Ideas that benefit those who propagate them will be motivated to create narratives, data, and a scientific-sounding framework to justify those ideas. This allows the ideas to spread more effectively. • With enough resources, incentives, and effort, these ideas can manufacture selective or misleading statistics, studies, expert opinions, journals, conferences, and more to create the illusion of scientific validity. • Over multiple iterations, as the ideas spread more widely, there is a kind of "selection pressure" to continually strengthen the scientific credibility and authority of the ideas. Contradicting evidence and opinions get weeded out. • The spread of such ideas is difficult to stop once they gain enough momentum. They become accepted based more on ideology, populism, and emotional appeal rather than scientific merit. Legitimate science progressing on its own is a slow process. • This process of generating pseudoscience to justify an idea often begins with a kernel of truth or misleading insight. The idea is then dressed up in scientific jargon, studies, statistics, experts, journals, etc. to make it seem far more credible and evidence-based than it really is. • The incentives driving this process are often ideological, political, or financial. There are motivations to promote the idea for its own sake, not because of any genuine scientific merit. The "science" is secondary to the incentives. • Over multiple iterations of spreading the idea, there is continuous adaptation to counter criticisms and strengthen the scientific credentialing. Contradicting information is dismissed; confirming anecdotes and studies are highlighted. Confirmation bias takes over. • There is no single or simple solution. Improving scientific literacy, evaluating evidence rigorously, reducing biases, avoiding tribalism - these are all difficult with large groups and complex ideas. And there will always be some degree of pseudoscience. Solutions: • We must remain vigilant, continue advancing legitimate science, promote independent and critical thinking, avoid politicizing science, prevent commercial interests from manipulating research, and be wary of "motivated reasoning" that confirms what we already believe. • Science culture and institutions must work to prevent prestigious journals, conferences, teams, studies, data, professors, think tanks, etc. from being "bought" and used to rubber-stamp preconceived notions rather than follow evidence wherever it leads. • There will be no escape from an open system where ideas can spread unpredictably. But we must make the system as resistant as possible to the spread of "fiat science" and make authentic science as robust as possible. It is an ongoing effort. • In a complex, evolving system like society, some degree of "fiat science" or pseudoscience gaining ground is unavoidable, as there are always incentives to promote self-serving ideas, not all of which can be evaluated for scientific validity. Legitimate science acts as a check, but cannot eliminate this completely. • The only real solutions are promoting scientific critical thinking, evaluating evidence over appeals to authority or emotion, and avoiding biases that can lead people to prefer ideologically convenient "alternative facts." But these are difficult solutions to implement at scale. This captures how the spread of non-scientific or even "anti-scientific" ideas is enabled through motivated distortions of the scientific process itself. Legitimate science is an ongoing effort, not an end point. And "fiat science" aims to undermine that effort by masquerading as science. Constant vigilance and skepticism are required to defend the scientific approach. Science must always remain evidence-based and avoid being bought or politicized. And we must work to build systems resistant to the spread of unjustified ideas. It is a continual struggle. --- Credit: @saifedean for coining the term “Fiat Science”.

The New York Times hypocritically attacks Bitcoin mining operations for their energy consumption and carbon footprint, while conveniently ignoring the enormous environmental impact of their own paper mills, printing plants and industrial operations. While the NYT laments Bitcoin miners using electricity, they fail to recognize that electricity production itself is already regulated. Bitcoin mining does not directly emit any pollution or greenhouse gases - it simply consumes electricity generated from a mix of energy sources that are regulated and moving towards renewable energy. If powering electric cars is considered environmentally friendly, then the electricity usage of Bitcoin miners should not be vilified either. Unlike the renewable energy arguments the NYT makes against Bitcoin, their own massive paper and printing plants rely on clearly polluting and unsustainable practices, from logging old-growth forests to dumping toxic waste into rivers. The pollution and health hazards caused by the NYT's own industrial facilities have led to numerous lawsuits, fines, and criticism from communities and environmental groups over the decades. The New York Times attacks Bitcoin not out of environmental principle but due to political and financial interests. A decentralized digital currency threatens their privilege and control. They dismiss how Bitcoin empower people all over the world with access to finance and stronger economic freedom, especially in developing countries. To NYT, the environment only matters when it can be used to argue against technologies that could challenge established systems of power and wealth. While advocating for environmental progress, the New York Times fails to practice what they preach. Their own disproportionate consumption and pollution undermines any moral authority on the issue. Only by remedying their own unsustainable practices can they rightfully criticize the environmental impacts of others. Until then, their attacks on Bitcoin mining remain unjustified, self-serving and rooted in politics rather than facts. Study #Bitcoin

Humanity is currently grappling with the uncanny valley phenomenon when interacting with AI. Although the technology has not yet achieved true sentience, it can still appear eerily human-like at times, causing discomfort and confusion among people. As AI continues to advance and undergo exponential doubling of its abilities, these feelings of unease will only intensify in the future. But, it's important to keep in mind that the real concern is not about Artificial Intelligence per se, but about us as emotionally charged beings and how we may react when we feel scared or threatened. Our reactions to AI are unpredictable, and we must prepare ourselves for the ethical and societal implications that come with interacting with intelligence on par or even better than our own. The unknown awaits.

A sense of unease creeps into your mind as you gaze upon the awe-inspiring face before you. In this cinematic portrayal of humanity, you are confronted with a reality that is both humbling and terrifying - a reality where intelligence far superior to our own looms before us, and we are left unsure of how to proceed. As you take in the intricate detailing, you can almost feel the weight of the situation pressing down on you. As we stand in front of a being that is both beyond our comprehension and yet a product of our own creation, the moment is incredibly significant because of how much it resembles life. And yet, even as we stand in the presence of this incomprehensible intelligence, we cannot help but wonder - what will happen next? Will we be able to find a way to coexist with this entity, or will we be forever at its mercy? As you contemplate these questions, you realize that the image before you is more than just a work of art - it is a profound meditation on the nature of humanity, our place in the universe, and our relationship with the unknown.

The key idea here is that #Bitcoin and its finite supply of 21 million coins represents a paradigm shift from fiat currencies issued by central governments with unlimited supply and the discretion to print as much money as they wish. All major fiat currencies throughout history have eventually failed due to inflation and loss of purchasing power. Bitcoin's scarcity and immutable design offers a promising alternative. With only 21 million Bitcoins that will ever be produced, its value cannot be diluted into oblivion through reckless money creation and quantitative easing like central banks do today. Once mainstream adoption grows the market cap of Bitcoin, the value per coin has tremendous potential to rise geometrically due to the fixed supply. By comparison, the market caps of the top 29 fiat currencies could all be eclipsed by and absorbed into Bitcoin, because their numbers can simply be made larger at any time. All the while, Bitcoin's supply is forever fixed at 21 million, and thus, ∞/21. No amount of government policy can debase Bitcoin's value by printing trillions more into existence. Its enduring property of scarcity and sound money design suggest that over the long run, all fiat currencies are doomed to fail while Bitcoin could thrive as a byproduct of their failure. The market recognizes this probability by giving Bitcoin an already higher valuation than most major national currencies. Bitcoin is not just another asset class, but a monetary revolution with the potential to transcend the manipulated and discredited fiat systems of the past. ∞/21 captures this revolutionary idea in a nutshell. In the decades to come, the relative values of currencies versus Bitcoin may come to reflect this concept. Study #Bitcoin. Image from Twitter.

Bitcoin is currently reaching new all-time highs in Argentina, and it's important to remember that the US dollar isn't the sole determinant of Bitcoin’s value. Rather, it's merely another exchange rate in relation to BTC. As an student of #Bitcoin, it's important not to be overly focused on American-centric perspectives. The truth is, Bitcoin's USD all-time high is just around the corner as the next halving looms closer. It's vital to recognize that Bitcoin is not just some investment vehicle; it's the new global single currency that is monetizing and transforming into money for all of humanity. When you buy Bitcoin today, you have the opportunity to own a piece of the future of money for only a fraction of its potential value. That's what's up.

I'm excited to share with you an introductory article on Bitcoin that I just finished writing! I know it can be a complex topic, but don't worry - I've simplified it using the Khan Academy course. In my guide, you'll find a single link that will give you a comprehensive understanding of #Bitcoin, whether you're a beginner or have some experience. Check it out! If you find this guide helpful, please like and share it with your friends. Let me know your thoughts and questions in the comments!

From Basics to Advanced: A Comprehensive Beginner's Guide to Bitcoin

New to Bitcoin? Want to learn about Bitcoin but don't know where to start? This comprehensive guide has everything from basics to advanced knowledg...

All the world's wealth is gravitating toward Bitcoin. And there's nothing anyone can do to stop it. The emergence of a sounder form of money naturally draws value away from less sound currencies and assets. Their purchasing power declines relative to the harder money. Bitcoin's presence is repricing the world's wealth in its direction. Nothing can stop this dynamic once it gets underway. The migration of value to Bitcoin is inevitable. Its scarcity and security provide an irresistible safe haven and store of value relative to the alternatives. Bit by bit, drop by drop, trillions of dollars of value are being absorbed into Bitcoin. And this process will only accelerate over time. There are no brakes on this train. https://twitter.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/1642265205643046915

This Senate speech exemplifies what makes America's system of government worth defending despite the flaws I usually highlight. The fact that reasoned, logical arguments find a platform even in the highest echelons of power—the US Senate—embodies the spirit of open discourse fundamental to all democracies everywhere. The Senator compellingly lays out the case against military intervention, which could lead to catastrophic nuclear war, grounding his arguments in hard truths in contrast to the belligerent war-mongering rhetoric that frequently dominated much of the debate since the war in Ukraine began. While one may disagree with the Senator's position, his speech reminds us of why free expression and democratic institutions are so crucial to the foundation of good governance. Only by protecting open and honest debate, free from verbal manipulation and emotional appeals, can reason and logic shape policy, even at the highest levels of power. In today's polarized political landscape, this type of address offers a welcome dose of sobriety and rational thinking when advocating for a challenging position or stance. In fractured times, speeches like this offer hope, reason may prevail, and a dose of much-needed courage in the face of difficult choices. Watch.

X (formerly Twitter)

Eric Brakey 🌲🦔 (@EricBrakey) on X

For the sake of America, Ukraine, Russia, and the world — we need immediate diplomacy, not reckless commitments to prolong the war in Ukraine for...

If governments are considering banning bitcoin, it is a troubling sign that demands vigilance, not fear. While we should not succumb to fomo or hysteria, we must recognize such actions as encroaching on human freedoms gained through centuries of struggle—including philosophical reflection, social movements, and seminal events like the the invention of the printing press and the French Revolution. The idea of universal human rights has evolved memetically, adapting to confront new injustices. Our conception of rights is still gradually evolving, influenced by historical events and broader currents shaping human progress. Bitcoin's potential to democratize access to resources evokes this ongoing human rights narrative. However, while banning self-custody would be an authoritarian affront to human progress, it is difficult to predict if many countries will ban bitcoin or if it would significantly impact power structures. However, in order to protect yourself, we must assume it will be banned, and so you must inadvertently prepare for that outcome. Although the future is uncertain, we must not take a neutral global monetary system like Bitcoin for granted. We should assume bitcoin's survival depends on individuals taking action—accumulating bitcoin, using it privately, and being prepared. Only by defending the liberties that allow new technologies to emerge will we keep thriving as a species. While this is no time for panic, it is a time for vigilance and principled action. #boatingaccident

The notion of 'late stage capitalism' points to a system in crisis, propped up by an unsustainable fiat money system based on government-issued funny-money-monopoly-currencies like the U.S. dollar. The dollar's status as the global reserve currency allows the U.S. to print money and accumulate debt on a massive scale. This distorts the economy, exacerbates inequality, and risks eventual collapse. #Bitcoin presents an alternative with a capped supply and decentralized issuance. As a scarce digital commodity, Bitcoin cannot be debased at will by a central authority. It has the potential to serve as a lifeline in a post-fiat world and on a global scale. If the dollar's reign ends, Bitcoin could offer a path forward using sound money with known rules that no one can change. As the inevitable end game of the fiat money Ponzi scheme approaches, Bitcoin stands ready as a lifeline to the post-fiat future. The development of Bitcoin's decentralized, sound money system is a vital preparation for the failure of central bank fiat and a world seeking an alternative. Transitioning to a Bitcoin standard would require time, but doing so could help avoid the worst consequences of late stage fiat money and offer economic freedom from manipulation and mismanagement of money. As people wake up to fiat's flaws, Bitcoin will emerge as the compelling alternative to revive capitalism and build a more sustainable system for the long term.

Maintaining multiple social media takes a lot of effort. But I feel it's important to stay on Nostr. I am totally shadow-banned info oblivion on Twitter. So have to cross-post some of my posts from twitter, Instagram and Facebook.