I've never understood how any *good faith* progressive person can possibly be against this. I have no doubts the intellectual leaders of the fake "progressive" movements are against it because their goal is always and everywhere to turn citizens into cattle dependent on the State by making their lives unsafe (and forfeiting some of them in the process). In my country, what this woman did would be impossible, since she would not have a firearm that she could legally use to defend herself. Even in her own home. Even if she did have a firearm for "sports" reasons (as I do own several). Too many *good faith* Americans are way too frivolous about the vital importance of the 2nd Amendment, and refuse to understand that you can't have "common sense" regulation of the right to defend yourself.

There is a fine line between this very correct statement down here, and the edgy incel pseudo-stoic positions that dominate the right-leaning, young man-focused new internet discourse. View quoted note →

In this case a more realistic (mock) headline would be: "China finds ancient documents that indicate 3rd century BC hut dwelling tribe of fishermen from Manchuria sailed 300 miles close to Japanese island, thus confirming Chinese ownership". View quoted note →

- Stay hum... - No. Not today.

I just thought how utterly fucked CoinBase, the Twinkerpinkle twins, Crypto.com are gonna be if the Trump administration makes amends with Binance, and I could help but feel a smile on my face.

Wen dip?