noView quoted note →

@dluvian I gotta be real with you, I think I like nozzle better than voyage...

Its not about making anyone angry CTRLPew, its about having a weapon that understands you as much as you understand it. And maybe it's also about turning heads at the range.... View quoted note →

Thank the goodness in humanity for these guys! View quoted note →

Finally! View quoted note →

We're calling bank accounts wallets and websites clients. How to fix this brainrot? View quoted note →

On this note, a PSA on using large language models for programming: Don't. AI Copilot Code Quality Evaluating 2024's Increased Defect Rate via Code Quality Metrics 211m lines of analyzed code + projections for 2025 William Harding, Lead Researcher & CEO Alloy.dev Research Published February, 2025

Redirecting...

View quoted note →

noView quoted note →

I highly encourage trying the notebook approach if you're interested in going that far. Instantaneous communication is great, until you get 100 notifications for 3 apps all dying to addict you to keep attention plus people you don't have time to talk to because you're trying to live real life for a minute, trying to get your attention RIGHT NOW plus your boss trying to basically get you to work 24/7 by getting you to have work email and chat on your phone. Nah. Delay tolerant networking is the future of day to day communication. Want to talk? I'll see if I can fit you into the schedule, but not right now. View quoted note →

I would like to answer this question. The Bitcoin community stubbornly says "no" even when faced with painful consequences. Only dire consequences tend to get action, because the downside of leaving behind people who say no approaches an acceptable threshold. So what if we no longer have a block subsidy, and we got so good at layer 2s that no one is paying for on-chain security? Well, attackers could undo open channels and prevent the latest channel state and justice transactions from getting mined (hypothetically) Then, the consequences of leaving behind people who refuse a change mean nothing in comparison to the consequences of doing nothing. It is only when we're in this situation that inconvenient solutions will be able to activate on mainchain Bitcoin. Bonus take: I think the ideal solution is to have multi-block fees for transactions so that you're paying for your block and the security to keep that block in the most proof of work chain. I think this will be convenient in a multi-party channel system (even more so in a vutxo/lightning hybrid system) because so long as we recognize a difference between operators and users, users pay routing fees, which operators use to pay for the security of the system + profit. View quoted note →