i dont know know how many times i have to say this, bitcoin "security budget" or miners rewards are a non problem, any bitcoin decision/change that is made based on this is retarded and dangerous.
Ronin
ronin@nostrplebs.com
npub13thh...wvcs
Bitcoiner. Web developer.
2x CHAMPIONS!!
Just an handkerchief and a toothpick or its all fake made by AI, nothing to see here pleb. lol. They are not our tribe, they dont give a fuck about you or me, or who goes to war or who dies, we are their slaves, and they don't give af about slaves. Defund them, swap your slave tokens for bitcoin, take care of yourself and your family.
People are having a mental meltdown because others are choosing to run a different implementation of a bitcoin node, that is basically equivalent to Core without the new update.
So citria wants to have some sort of permissionless bridge from base layer to them, so they need op_return limits out to do it, oh but if Core doesn't do it its worse, because they will send the txs directly to miners out of band that have a deal with them. This makes its seem that for citrea its all the same, and for the network is worse,well if they need some deals with some miners that doesn't seem that trustless anymore does it? Seems to me that not merging this change is worse for citrea that has money invested and not a solid product than for the network.
I am a dev and devs are often "stupid" because we think in absolutes and we either have a perfect solution for a problem or its useless. Bitcoin is more probabilistic and it is also social/political.