Ok, so filters are bad for Citrea business but they would do more harm by bloating the utxo set, yes, unless you add filters for them like Luke said. Ok, but then it would be a useless cat and mouse game, cat and mouse games is something a decentralized censorship resistant business like citrea cannot afford to play. Bitcoin can.

If filters don't work, why doesn't Citrea still used op_return anyway ? Because they work, in the sense that for Citrea even if possible it's a big risk for their business, that s why they went for the option of putting it in the utxo set, because of filters and they need bitcoin network censorship resistance.

Very simple for me. 1- if filters don't work at all, it's ok to leave it. 2-if they work, leave it or spam will skyrocket. 3-in doubt, don't change bitcoin. Core handled this very badly. So for me it's run old version of Core, or Knots, to leave bitcoin as it is now.

op_return filter and limits are so bad that everyone has been running them since 2013 and everyone is running them right now, so I but now apparently everyone is retarded, and all those past devs didn't know shit either.

Core arguments are like those normies who say any attempt at privacy is useless bc you have to give some data to someone eventually or someone leaks your phone to others and "what do you have to hide".

how will nodes running on machines with AV handle malicious code (virus) on Core 30 op_return.

Any relay that accepts any kind of event that is cool for testing and doesn't block and treats as spam?

No bigger than the pixel 5 please. IPhone 13 mini might be the ideal size.

@jack we're going to need phones that ship with GrapheneOs. Googlag is closing the doors.