i like how mutiny calls it “esats” instead of “ecash”. it makes it very clear from a upfront terminology point of view what the distinction of this new generation of ecash is from attempts of the past: it’s backed by sats instead of fiat.
personally i feel cashu would be easier to understand if the default UX was that all sats sent to the mint are immediately issued as ecash tokens back to me rather than that being a separate step at payment time
ecash noob question: even if theoretically ecash transactions are private, in practice given apps like enuts don't push you to create ecash tokens ahead of time and the moment of token creation (mint) is coupled with the payment moment (burn) doesn't the mint operator have pretty good visibility into who paid whom?
top UX struggle w/ primal right now for me:
if someone tags me on a note and it goes viral i have no way of not getting notifications on that and it basically makes my personal notifications unfollowable for a while until that note dies down
update: coinbase custody now supports sending to taproot (bech32m) addresses!
not rolled out to the retail coinbase app yet but soon.
once coinbase graduates from this list then it's really just binance we need to get onboard?
(source: whentaproot.org)
look, ppl should self custody their bitcoin
BUT if your normie friend is about to buy these ETFs anyways, please consider pointing them to bitwise (ticker: BITB)
notable features:
- lowest fee amongst the four billion plus AUM products (20 bps)
- 10% of profits donation to devs (via opensats, brink, hrf)
- public transparency (only one to publish holding addresses)
- we care (do you see anyone else on nostr?)
[BITB disclosures & prospectus: bitbetf.com/welcome]
ppl shit on the bay area (and sf) all the time but the cryptography-forward anti-authoritarian resistance (cypherpunk movement) originated in berkeley/oakland. i’m always proud of that heritage. ny/la/miami could never.
ecash (both cashu and fedimint) is by far what i’m most excited about flying back from bitcoin atlantis
chaumium ecash failed in the 80s bc we tried to build it on top of fiat and tradfi banks. on top of bitcoin and lightning it has the potential to absolutely crush scaling bitcoin payments and user privacy
View quoted note →